* [RFC][PATCH] Sector Size check during Mount
@ 2011-11-30 1:44 Keith Mannthey
2011-11-30 15:06 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Keith Mannthey @ 2011-11-30 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Gracefully fail when trying to mount a BTRFS file system that has a
sectorsize smaller than PAGE_SIZE.
On PPC it is possible to build a FS while using a 4k PAGE_SIZE kernel
then boot into a 64K PAGE_SIZE kernel. Presently open_ctree fails in an
endless loop and hangs the machine in this situation.
My debugging has show this Sector size < Page size to be a non trivial
situation and a graceful exit from the situation would be nice for the
time being.
Signed-off-by: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>
---
diff -urN a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c 2011-10-09 21:53:11.000000000 -0500
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c 2011-11-29 17:33:15.000000000 -0600
@@ -1916,6 +1916,12 @@
goto fail_sb_buffer;
}
+ if (sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "btrfs: Incompatible sector size "
+ "found on %s\n", sb->s_id);
+ goto fail_sb_buffer;
+ }
+
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
ret = btrfs_read_sys_array(tree_root);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC][PATCH] Sector Size check during Mount
2011-11-30 1:44 [RFC][PATCH] Sector Size check during Mount Keith Mannthey
@ 2011-11-30 15:06 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2011-11-30 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Mannthey; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 05:44:12PM -0800, Keith Mannthey wrote:
> Gracefully fail when trying to mount a BTRFS file system that has a
> sectorsize smaller than PAGE_SIZE.
>
> On PPC it is possible to build a FS while using a 4k PAGE_SIZE kernel
> then boot into a 64K PAGE_SIZE kernel. Presently open_ctree fails in an
> endless loop and hangs the machine in this situation.
>
> My debugging has show this Sector size < Page size to be a non trivial
> situation and a graceful exit from the situation would be nice for the
> time being.
Thanks. The large block size patches should finally go into 3.3, which
will make a big difference.
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-30 15:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-30 1:44 [RFC][PATCH] Sector Size check during Mount Keith Mannthey
2011-11-30 15:06 ` Chris Mason
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox