From: Tomasz Pala <gotar@polanet.pl>
To: Linux fs Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unexpected raid1 behaviour
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:23:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171219222308.GE14726@polanet.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aac98fbf-c94b-1a88-f191-902146ff544f@gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 15:47:03 -0500, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
>> Sth like this? I got such problem a few months ago, my solution was
>> accepted upstream:
>> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/0e8856d25ab71764a279c2377ae593c0f2460d8f
>>
>> Rationale is in referred ticket, udev would not support any more btrfs
>> logic, so unless btrfs handles this itself on kernel level (daemon?),
>> that is all that can be done.
> Or maybe systemd can quit trying to treat BTRFS like a volume manager
> (which it isn't) and just try to mount the requested filesystem with the
> requested options?
Tried that before ("just mount my filesystem, stupid"), it is a no-go.
The problem source is not within systemd treating BTRFS differently, but
in btrfs kernel logic that it uses. Just to show it:
1. create 2-volume btrfs, e.g. /dev/sda and /dev/sdb,
2. reboot the system into clean state (init=/bin/sh), (or remove btrfs-scan tool),
3. try
mount /dev/sda /test - fails
mount /dev/sdb /test - works
4. reboot again and try in reversed order
mount /dev/sdb /test - fails
mount /dev/sda /test - works
THIS readiness is exposed via udev to systemd. And it must be used for
multi-layer setups to work (consider stacked LUKS, LVM, MD, iSCSI, FC etc).
In short: until *something* scans all the btrfs components, so the
kernel makes it ready, systemd won't even try to mount it.
> Then you would just be able to specify 'degraded' in
> your mount options, and you don't have to care that the kernel refuses
> to mount degraded filesystems without being explicitly asked to.
Exactly. But since LP refused to try mounting despite kernel "not-ready"
state - it is the kernel that must emit 'ready'. So the
question is: how can I make kernel to mark degraded array as "ready"?
The obvious answer is: do it via kernel command line, just like mdadm
does:
rootflags=device=/dev/sda,device=/dev/sdb
rootflags=device=/dev/sda,device=missing
rootflags=device=/dev/sda,device=/dev/sdb,degraded
If only btrfs.ko recognized this, kernel would be able to assemble
multivolume btrfs itself. Not only this would allow automated degraded
mounts, it would also allow using initrd-less kernels on such volumes.
>> It doesn't have to be default, might be kernel compile-time knob, module
>> parameter or anything else to make the *R*aid work.
> There's a mount option for it per-filesystem. Just add that to all your
> mount calls, and you get exactly the same effect.
If only they were passed...
--
Tomasz Pala <gotar@pld-linux.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-16 19:50 Unexpected raid1 behaviour Dark Penguin
2017-12-17 11:58 ` Duncan
2017-12-17 15:48 ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-17 20:42 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-18 8:49 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 8:49 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 10:36 ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-18 12:10 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-18 13:43 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 22:28 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-18 22:29 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-19 12:30 ` Adam Borowski
2017-12-19 12:54 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-19 12:59 ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-18 13:06 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-18 19:43 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-18 22:01 ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-19 12:46 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 12:25 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 14:46 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 16:35 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 17:56 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 19:47 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-19 21:17 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 0:08 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-23 4:08 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-23 5:23 ` Duncan
2017-12-20 16:53 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-20 16:57 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-20 20:02 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 20:07 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 20:14 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-21 1:34 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-21 11:49 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-19 20:11 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 21:58 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 13:10 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 23:53 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 13:12 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 18:31 ` George Mitchell
2017-12-19 20:28 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 19:35 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-19 20:41 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 20:47 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 22:23 ` Tomasz Pala [this message]
2017-12-20 13:33 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-20 17:28 ` Duncan
2017-12-21 11:44 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-21 12:27 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-22 16:05 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-22 21:04 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-23 2:52 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-23 5:40 ` Duncan
2017-12-19 23:59 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 8:34 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 8:51 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 19:49 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-18 5:11 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 1:20 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-18 13:31 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-12 12:26 ` Dark Penguin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171219222308.GE14726@polanet.pl \
--to=gotar@polanet.pl \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox