From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unexpected raid1 behaviour
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:28:10 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$758ef$cfef6027$b6ab67ce$233e8581@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 862f03b0-9311-09f6-ee2c-d53d35d176bd@gmail.com
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:33:03 -0500 as
excerpted:
>> The obvious answer is: do it via kernel command line, just like mdadm
>> does:
>> rootflags=device=/dev/sda,device=/dev/sdb
>> rootflags=device=/dev/sda,device=missing
>> rootflags=device=/dev/sda,device=/dev/sdb,degraded
>>
>> If only btrfs.ko recognized this, kernel would be able to assemble
>> multivolume btrfs itself. Not only this would allow automated degraded
>> mounts, it would also allow using initrd-less kernels on such volumes.
> Last I checked, the 'device=' options work on upstream kernels just
> fine, though I've never tried the degraded option. Of course, I'm also
> not using systemd, so it may be some interaction with systemd that's
> causing them to not work (and yes, I understand that I'm inclined to
> blame systemd most of the time based on significant past experience with
> systemd creating issues that never existed before).
Has the bug where rootflags=device=/dev/sda1,device=/dev/sdb1 failed,
been fixed? Last I knew (which was ancient history in btrfs terms, but
I've not seen mention of a patch for it in all that time either), device=
on the userspace commandline worked, and device= on the kernel commandline
worked if there was just one device, but it would fail for more than one
device. Mounting degraded (on a pair-device raid1) would then of course
work, since it would just use the one device=, but that's simply
dangerous for routine use regardless of whether it actually assembled or
not, thus effectively forcing an initr* for multi-device btrfs root in
ordered to get it mounted properly.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-16 19:50 Unexpected raid1 behaviour Dark Penguin
2017-12-17 11:58 ` Duncan
2017-12-17 15:48 ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-17 20:42 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-18 8:49 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 8:49 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 10:36 ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-18 12:10 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-18 13:43 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 22:28 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-18 22:29 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-19 12:30 ` Adam Borowski
2017-12-19 12:54 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-19 12:59 ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-18 13:06 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-18 19:43 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-18 22:01 ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-19 12:46 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 12:25 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 14:46 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 16:35 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 17:56 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 19:47 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-19 21:17 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 0:08 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-23 4:08 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-23 5:23 ` Duncan
2017-12-20 16:53 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-20 16:57 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-20 20:02 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 20:07 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 20:14 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-21 1:34 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-21 11:49 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-19 20:11 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 21:58 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 13:10 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 23:53 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 13:12 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 18:31 ` George Mitchell
2017-12-19 20:28 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 19:35 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-19 20:41 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 20:47 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 22:23 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 13:33 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-20 17:28 ` Duncan [this message]
2017-12-21 11:44 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-21 12:27 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-22 16:05 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-22 21:04 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-23 2:52 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-23 5:40 ` Duncan
2017-12-19 23:59 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 8:34 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 8:51 ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 19:49 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-18 5:11 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 1:20 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-18 13:31 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-12 12:26 ` Dark Penguin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='pan$758ef$cfef6027$b6ab67ce$233e8581@cox.net' \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox