Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Dark Penguin <darkpenguin@yandex.ru>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unexpected raid1 behaviour
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:20:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d526204-a30e-8a41-124e-f639cdbe5ba7@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A357909.8010206@yandex.ru>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2469 bytes --]



On 2017年12月17日 03:50, Dark Penguin wrote:
> Could someone please point me towards some read about how btrfs handles
> multiple devices? Namely, kicking faulty devices and re-adding them.
> 
> I've been using btrfs on single devices for a while, but now I want to
> start using it in raid1 mode. I booted into an Ubuntu 17.10 LiveCD and
> tried to see how does it handle various situations.
> The experience left
> me very surprised; I've tried a number of things, all of which produced
> unexpected results.
> 
> I create a btrfs raid1 filesystem on two hard drives and mount it.

Initial info like "btrfs fi df" will help us to dig this further.

> 
> - When I pull one of the drives out (simulating a simple cable failure,
> which happens pretty often to me), the filesystem sometimes goes
> read-only. ???

Please provide the kernel message.

> - But only after a while, and not always. ???
> - When I fix the cable problem (plug the device back), it's immediately
> "re-added" back. But I see no replication of the data I've written onto
> a degraded filesystem... Nothing shows any problems, so "my filesystem
> must be ok". ???

Needs extra info like "btrfs fi df"

> - If I unmount the filesystem and then mount it back, I see all my
> recent changes lost (everything I wrote during the "degraded" period).
> - If I continue working with a degraded raid1 filesystem (even without
> damaging it further by re-adding the faulty device), after a while it
> won't mount at all, even with "-o degraded".

Please provide kernel message too.
Although I doubt about the usefulness, it's still better than none.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
> I can't wrap my head about all this. Either the kicked device should not
> be re-added, or it should be re-added "properly", or it should at least
> show some errors and not pretend nothing happened, right?..
> 
> I must be missing something. Is there an explanation somewhere about
> what's really going on during those situations? Also, do I understand
> correctly that upon detecting a faulty device (a write error), nothing
> is done about it except logging an error into the 'btrfs device stats'
> report? No device kicking, no notification?.. And what about degraded
> filesystems - is it absolutely forbidden to work with them without
> converting them to a "single" filesystem first?..
> 
> On Ubuntu 17.10, there's Linux 4.13.0-16 and btrfs-progs 4.12-1 .
> 
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-18  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-16 19:50 Unexpected raid1 behaviour Dark Penguin
2017-12-17 11:58 ` Duncan
2017-12-17 15:48   ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-17 20:42     ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-18  8:49       ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18  8:49     ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 10:36       ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-18 12:10       ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-18 13:43         ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18 22:28       ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-18 22:29         ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-19 12:30         ` Adam Borowski
2017-12-19 12:54         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-19 12:59         ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-18 13:06     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-18 19:43       ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-18 22:01         ` Peter Grandi
2017-12-19 12:46           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 12:25         ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 14:46           ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 16:35             ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 17:56               ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 19:47                 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-19 21:17                   ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20  0:08                     ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-23  4:08                       ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-23  5:23                         ` Duncan
2017-12-20 16:53                   ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-20 16:57                     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-20 20:02                     ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 20:07                       ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 20:14                         ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-21  1:34                           ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-21 11:49                         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-19 20:11                 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 21:58                   ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 13:10                     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 23:53                   ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20 13:12                     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 18:31             ` George Mitchell
2017-12-19 20:28               ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 19:35             ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-19 20:41               ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-19 20:47                 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-19 22:23                   ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 13:33                     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-20 17:28                       ` Duncan
2017-12-21 11:44                   ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-12-21 12:27                     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-22 16:05                       ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-22 21:04                         ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-23  2:52                           ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-23  5:40                             ` Duncan
2017-12-19 23:59                 ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-20  8:34                   ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20  8:51                     ` Tomasz Pala
2017-12-20 19:49                     ` Chris Murphy
2017-12-18  5:11   ` Anand Jain
2017-12-18  1:20 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-12-18 13:31 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-12 12:26   ` Dark Penguin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d526204-a30e-8a41-124e-f639cdbe5ba7@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=darkpenguin@yandex.ru \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox