From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: [PATCH 11/22] clk: Skip set_rate_range if our clock is orphan
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 11:10:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220408091037.2041955-12-maxime@cerno.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220408091037.2041955-1-maxime@cerno.tech>
clk_set_rate_range will now force a clk_set_rate() call to
core->req_rate. However, if our clock is orphan, req_rate will be 0 and
we will thus end up calling a set_rate to 0 on potentially all that
clock subtree.
This can be fairly invasive and result in poor decisions. In such a
case, let's just store the new range but bail out and skip the set_rate.
When that clock is no longer orphan though, we should be enforcing the
new range but we don't. Let's add a skipped test to make sure we don't
forget about that corner case.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 6 +++++
drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 5b6ec11fcfcd..80fbec87309e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -2389,6 +2389,12 @@ static int clk_set_rate_range_nolock(struct clk *clk,
if (clk->core->flags & CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE)
rate = clk_core_get_rate_recalc(clk->core);
+ if (clk->core->orphan && !rate) {
+ pr_warn("%s: clk %s: Clock is orphan and doesn't have a rate!\n",
+ __func__, clk->core->name);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
/*
* Since the boundaries have been changed, let's give the
* opportunity to the provider to adjust the clock rate based on
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index fa6e32c460ac..0fffc70f9e2c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -735,6 +735,26 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_untouched(s
clk_put(parent);
}
+/*
+ * Test that, for a mux whose current parent hasn't been registered yet,
+ * calling clk_set_rate_range() will succeed but won't affect its rate.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+ unsigned long rate;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, 0);
+}
+
/*
* Test that, for a mux whose current parent hasn't been registered yet,
* calling clk_set_rate_range() will succeed, and will be taken into
@@ -758,6 +778,43 @@ clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate(struct kuni
KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
}
+/*
+ * Test that, for a mux that started orphan, was assigned and rate and
+ * then got switched to a valid parent, its rate is eventually within
+ * range.
+ *
+ * FIXME: Even though we update the rate as part of clk_set_parent(), we
+ * don't evaluate whether that new rate is within range and needs to be
+ * adjusted.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk, *parent;
+ unsigned long rate;
+ int ret;
+
+ kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
+
+ parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
+
+ ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+
+ clk_put(parent);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_get_parent),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent),
@@ -766,7 +823,9 @@ static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_test_cases[]
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_put),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_modified),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_parent_set_range_untouched),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_get_rate),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_multiple_parent_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate),
{}
};
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-08 9:10 [PATCH 00/22] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 01/22] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 02/22] clk: tests: Add test suites description Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23 4:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 03/22] clk: tests: Add reference to the orphan mux bug report Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 04/22] clk: tests: Add tests for uncached clock Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 05/22] clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 06/22] clk: tests: Add tests for mux with multiple parents Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 07/22] clk: tests: Add some tests for orphan " Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 08/22] clk: Take into account uncached clocks in clk_set_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 09/22] clk: Fix clk_get_parent() documentation Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 10/22] clk: Set req_rate on reparenting Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 12/22] clk: Add our request boundaries in clk_core_init_rate_req Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 13/22] clk: Change clk_core_init_rate_req prototype Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 14/22] clk: Introduce clk_hw_init_rate_request() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23 3:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 7:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 15/22] clk: Add missing clk_core_init_rate_req calls Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23 3:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 7:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 16/22] clk: Remove redundant clk_core_init_rate_req() call Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23 4:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 7:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 17/22] clk: Switch from __clk_determine_rate to clk_core_round_rate_nolock Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 18/22] clk: Introduce clk_core_has_parent() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 19/22] clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 20/22] clk: Zero the clk_rate_request structure Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 21/22] clk: Test the clock pointer in clk_hw_get_name() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 22/22] clk: Prevent a clock without a rate to register Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:18 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-08 10:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 11:24 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-08 12:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 14:48 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-08 15:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-11 7:40 ` Neil Armstrong
2022-04-12 12:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-11 8:20 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-23 4:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 9:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-29 2:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-29 15:45 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 12:17 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-08 12:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 13:46 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-23 4:12 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 7:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-10 12:06 ` [PATCH 00/22] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Yassine Oudjana
2022-04-11 11:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-11 6:25 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-04-11 7:24 ` Alexander Stein
2022-04-11 11:54 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220408091037.2041955-12-maxime@cerno.tech \
--to=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox