From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: [PATCH 18/22] clk: Introduce clk_core_has_parent()
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 11:10:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220408091037.2041955-19-maxime@cerno.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220408091037.2041955-1-maxime@cerno.tech>
We will need to know if a clk_core pointer has a given parent in other
functions, so let's create a clk_core_has_parent() function that
clk_has_parent() will call into.
For good measure, let's add some unit tests as well to make sure it
works properly.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 448ead0da1a5..2bbeeb2f729e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -546,6 +546,26 @@ static bool mux_is_better_rate(unsigned long rate, unsigned long now,
static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
struct clk_rate_request *req);
+static bool clk_core_has_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *parent)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ /* Optimize for the case where the parent is already the parent. */
+ if (core == parent)
+ return true;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < core->num_parents; i++) {
+ struct clk_core *tmp = clk_core_get_parent_by_index(core, i);
+ if (!tmp)
+ continue;
+
+ if (tmp == parent)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
int clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw,
struct clk_rate_request *req,
unsigned long flags)
@@ -2570,25 +2590,11 @@ void clk_hw_reparent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *new_parent)
*/
bool clk_has_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
{
- struct clk_core *core, *parent_core;
- int i;
-
/* NULL clocks should be nops, so return success if either is NULL. */
if (!clk || !parent)
return true;
- core = clk->core;
- parent_core = parent->core;
-
- /* Optimize for the case where the parent is already the parent. */
- if (core->parent == parent_core)
- return true;
-
- for (i = 0; i < core->num_parents; i++)
- if (!strcmp(core->parents[i].name, parent_core->name))
- return true;
-
- return false;
+ return clk_core_has_parent(clk->core, parent->core);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_has_parent);
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index 0fffc70f9e2c..0b9088cdb8fe 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -473,8 +473,24 @@ clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(parent, ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.clk));
}
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock with a multiple parents, clk_has_parent()
+ * actually reports all of them as parents.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.clk));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.clk));
+}
+
static struct kunit_case clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent),
{}
};
@@ -906,6 +922,21 @@ clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(parent, ctx->parent_ctx.hw.clk));
}
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock with a single parent, clk_has_parent() actually
+ * reports it as a parent.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+ struct clk *parent = ctx->parent_ctx.hw.clk;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent));
+}
+
/*
* Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single
* parent, if we set disjoints range on the parent and then the child,
@@ -1004,6 +1035,7 @@ clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller(struct kunit *test
static struct kunit_case clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller),
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-08 9:10 [PATCH 00/22] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 01/22] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 02/22] clk: tests: Add test suites description Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23 4:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 03/22] clk: tests: Add reference to the orphan mux bug report Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 04/22] clk: tests: Add tests for uncached clock Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 05/22] clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 06/22] clk: tests: Add tests for mux with multiple parents Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 07/22] clk: tests: Add some tests for orphan " Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 08/22] clk: Take into account uncached clocks in clk_set_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 09/22] clk: Fix clk_get_parent() documentation Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 10/22] clk: Set req_rate on reparenting Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 11/22] clk: Skip set_rate_range if our clock is orphan Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 12/22] clk: Add our request boundaries in clk_core_init_rate_req Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 13/22] clk: Change clk_core_init_rate_req prototype Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 14/22] clk: Introduce clk_hw_init_rate_request() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23 3:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 7:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 15/22] clk: Add missing clk_core_init_rate_req calls Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23 3:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 7:32 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 16/22] clk: Remove redundant clk_core_init_rate_req() call Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23 4:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 7:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 17/22] clk: Switch from __clk_determine_rate to clk_core_round_rate_nolock Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 19/22] clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 20/22] clk: Zero the clk_rate_request structure Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 21/22] clk: Test the clock pointer in clk_hw_get_name() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:10 ` [PATCH 22/22] clk: Prevent a clock without a rate to register Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 9:18 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-08 10:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 11:24 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-08 12:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 14:48 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-08 15:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-11 7:40 ` Neil Armstrong
2022-04-12 12:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-11 8:20 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-23 4:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 9:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-29 2:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-29 15:45 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 12:17 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-08 12:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 13:46 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-23 4:12 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23 7:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-10 12:06 ` [PATCH 00/22] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Yassine Oudjana
2022-04-11 11:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-11 6:25 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-04-11 7:24 ` Alexander Stein
2022-04-11 11:54 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220408091037.2041955-19-maxime@cerno.tech \
--to=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox