From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 22/44] arm64: RMI: Handle realm enter/exit
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 14:38:59 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6cb82fc-a8be-49d3-8fa3-0107c8ab97f7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513131757.116630-23-steven.price@arm.com>
Hi Steve,
On 5/13/26 11:17 PM, Steven Price wrote:
> Entering a realm is done using a SMC call to the RMM. On exit the
> exit-codes need to be handled slightly differently to the normal KVM
> path so define our own functions for realm enter/exit and hook them
> in if the guest is a realm guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
> Chanegs since v13:
> * The RMM is now required to provide an ESR value with the correct
> information to emulate MMIO, so we no longer need to hardcode 0s in
> rec_exit_sys_reg().
> * The PSCI changes mean that there is a potential race when turning on
> a VCPU which can cause a RMI_ERROR_REC return. Exit to user space
> with -EAGAIN in this case.
> Changes since v12:
> * Call guest_state_{enter,exit}_irqoff() around rmi_rec_enter().
> * Add handling of the IRQ exception case where IRQs need to be briefly
> enabled before exiting guest timing.
> Changes since v8:
> * Introduce kvm_rec_pre_enter() called before entering an atomic
> section to handle operations that might require memory allocation
> (specifically completing a RIPAS change introduced in a later patch).
> * Updates to align with upstream changes to hpfar_el2 which now (ab)uses
> HPFAR_EL2_NS as a valid flag.
> * Fix exit reason when racing with PSCI shutdown to return
> KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN rather than KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN.
> Changes since v7:
> * A return of 0 from kvm_handle_sys_reg() doesn't mean the register has
> been read (although that can never happen in the current code). Tidy
> up the condition to handle any future refactoring.
> Changes since v6:
> * Use vcpu_err() rather than pr_err/kvm_err when there is an associated
> vcpu to the error.
> * Return -EFAULT for KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT as per the documentation for
> this exit type.
> * Split code handling a RIPAS change triggered by the guest to the
> following patch.
> Changes since v5:
> * For a RIPAS_CHANGE request from the guest perform the actual RIPAS
> change on next entry rather than immediately on the exit. This allows
> the VMM to 'reject' a RIPAS change by refusing to continue
> scheduling.
> Changes since v4:
> * Rename handle_rme_exit() to handle_rec_exit()
> * Move the loop to copy registers into the REC enter structure from the
> to rec_exit_handlers callbacks to kvm_rec_enter(). This fixes a bug
> where the handler exits to user space and user space wants to modify
> the GPRS.
> * Some code rearrangement in rec_exit_ripas_change().
> Changes since v2:
> * realm_set_ipa_state() now provides an output parameter for the
> top_iap that was changed. Use this to signal the VMM with the correct
> range that has been transitioned.
> * Adapt to previous patch changes.
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h | 4 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 26 ++++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c | 42 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> index d99bf4fc3c39..feb534a6678e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_destroy_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> +int kvm_rec_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +int kvm_rec_pre_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +int handle_rec_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rec_run_status);
> +
> static inline bool kvm_realm_is_private_address(struct realm *realm,
> unsigned long addr)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> index ed3cf30eb06e..4a2d52fdb6a2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ CFLAGS_handle_exit.o += -Wno-override-init
> kvm-y += arm.o mmu.o mmio.o psci.o hypercalls.o pvtime.o \
> inject_fault.o va_layout.o handle_exit.o config.o \
> guest.o debug.o reset.o sys_regs.o stacktrace.o \
> - vgic-sys-reg-v3.o fpsimd.o pkvm.o rmi.o \
> + vgic-sys-reg-v3.o fpsimd.o pkvm.o rmi.o rmi-exit.o \
> arch_timer.o trng.o vmid.o emulate-nested.o nested.o at.o \
> vgic/vgic.o vgic/vgic-init.o \
> vgic/vgic-irqfd.o vgic/vgic-v2.o \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 21d9dfdb1ea0..ed88a203b892 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -1331,6 +1331,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (ret > 0)
> ret = check_vcpu_requests(vcpu);
>
> + if (ret > 0 && vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
> + ret = kvm_rec_pre_enter(vcpu);
> +
> /*
> * Preparing the interrupts to be injected also
> * involves poking the GIC, which must be done in a
> @@ -1378,7 +1381,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> trace_kvm_entry(*vcpu_pc(vcpu));
> guest_timing_enter_irqoff();
>
> - ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_enter_exit(vcpu);
> + if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
> + ret = kvm_rec_enter(vcpu);
> + else
> + ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_enter_exit(vcpu);
>
> vcpu->mode = OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE;
> vcpu->stat.exits++;
> @@ -1424,7 +1430,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * context synchronization event) is necessary to ensure that
> * pending interrupts are taken.
> */
> - if (ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(ret) == ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ) {
> + if (ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(ret) == ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ ||
> + (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu) &&
> + vcpu->arch.rec.run->exit.exit_reason == RMI_EXIT_IRQ)) {
> local_irq_enable();
> isb();
> local_irq_disable();
The condition could be posssibly imprecise because ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(ret)
can be ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ even for a REC. So the precise condition would be:
if ((!vcpu_is_rec(vcpu) && ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(ret) == ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ) ||
(vcpu_is_rec(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.rec.run->exit.exit_reason == RMI_EXIT_IRQ)) {
> @@ -1436,8 +1444,13 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> trace_kvm_exit(ret, kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu), *vcpu_pc(vcpu));
>
> - /* Exit types that need handling before we can be preempted */
> - handle_exit_early(vcpu, ret);
> + if (!vcpu_is_rec(vcpu)) {
> + /*
> + * Exit types that need handling before we can be
> + * preempted
> + */
> + handle_exit_early(vcpu, ret);
> + }
>
> kvm_nested_sync_hwstate(vcpu);
>
> @@ -1462,7 +1475,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> ret = ARM_EXCEPTION_IL;
> }
>
> - ret = handle_exit(vcpu, ret);
> + if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
> + ret = handle_rec_exit(vcpu, ret);
> + else
> + ret = handle_exit(vcpu, ret);
> }
>
> /* Tell userspace about in-kernel device output levels */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e7c51b6cf6ce
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <kvm/arm_hypercalls.h>
> +#include <kvm/arm_psci.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/rmi_smc.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_rmi.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> +
> +typedef int (*exit_handler_fn)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +
> +static int rec_exit_reason_notimpl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> +
> + vcpu_err(vcpu, "Unhandled exit reason from realm (ESR: %#llx)\n",
> + rec->run->exit.esr);
> + return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
s/rec->run->exit.esr/kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu), rec->run->exit.esr has been
copied to the storage space pointed by kvm_vcpu_get_esr() in its caller.
> +static int rec_exit_sync_dabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return kvm_handle_guest_abort(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> +static int rec_exit_sync_iabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> +
> + vcpu_err(vcpu, "Unhandled instruction abort (ESR: %#llx).\n",
> + rec->run->exit.esr);
> + return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
s/rec->run->exit.esr/kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu)
> +static int rec_exit_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> + unsigned long esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> + int rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu);
> + bool is_write = (esr & ESR_ELx_SYS64_ISS_DIR_MASK) == ESR_ELx_SYS64_ISS_DIR_WRITE;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (is_write)
> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rt, rec->run->exit.gprs[rt]);
> +
> + ret = kvm_handle_sys_reg(vcpu);
> + if (!is_write)
> + rec->run->enter.gprs[rt] = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rt);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static exit_handler_fn rec_exit_handlers[] = {
> + [0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX] = rec_exit_reason_notimpl,
> + [ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64] = rec_exit_sys_reg,
> + [ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW] = rec_exit_sync_dabt,
> + [ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW] = rec_exit_sync_iabt
> +};
> +
> +static int rec_exit_psci(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < REC_RUN_GPRS; i++)
> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, i, rec->run->exit.gprs[i]);
> +
> + return kvm_smccc_call_handler(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> +static int rec_exit_ripas_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> + unsigned long base = rec->run->exit.ripas_base;
> + unsigned long top = rec->run->exit.ripas_top;
> + unsigned long ripas = rec->run->exit.ripas_value;
> +
> + if (!kvm_realm_is_private_address(realm, base) ||
> + !kvm_realm_is_private_address(realm, top - 1)) {
> + vcpu_err(vcpu, "Invalid RIPAS_CHANGE for %#lx - %#lx, ripas: %#lx\n",
> + base, top, ripas);
> + /* Set RMI_REJECT bit */
> + rec->run->enter.flags = REC_ENTER_FLAG_RIPAS_RESPONSE;
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
I doubt if the flag (REC_ENTER_FLAG_RIPAS_RESPONSE) will be handed over to RMM
since the negative return value forces we're exiting to VMM like QEMU where
how this problematic case can be handled is TBD.
> +
> + /* Exit to VMM, the actual RIPAS change is done on next entry */
> + kvm_prepare_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, base, top - base, false, false,
> + ripas == RMI_RAM);
> +
> + /*
> + * KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT requires an return code of -EFAULT, see the
> + * API documentation
> + */
> + return -EFAULT;
> +}
> +
> +static void update_arch_timer_irq_lines(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> +
> + __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTV_CTL_EL0, rec->run->exit.cntv_ctl);
> + __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTV_CVAL_EL0, rec->run->exit.cntv_cval);
> + __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTP_CTL_EL0, rec->run->exit.cntp_ctl);
> + __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTP_CVAL_EL0, rec->run->exit.cntp_cval);
> +
> + kvm_realm_timers_update(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Return > 0 to return to guest, < 0 on error, 0 (and set exit_reason) on
> + * proper exit to userspace.
> + */
> +int handle_rec_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rec_run_ret)
> +{
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> + u8 esr_ec = ESR_ELx_EC(rec->run->exit.esr);
> + unsigned long status, index;
> +
> + status = RMI_RETURN_STATUS(rec_run_ret);
> + index = RMI_RETURN_INDEX(rec_run_ret);
> +
> + /*
> + * If a PSCI_SYSTEM_OFF request raced with a vcpu executing, we might
> + * see the following status code and index indicating an attempt to run
> + * a REC when the RD state is SYSTEM_OFF. In this case, we just need to
> + * return to user space which can deal with the system event or will try
> + * to run the KVM VCPU again, at which point we will no longer attempt
> + * to enter the Realm because we will have a sleep request pending on
> + * the VCPU as a result of KVM's PSCI handling.
> + */
> + if (status == RMI_ERROR_REALM) {
> + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If a VCPU has been turned on, but the REC state hasn't been updated
> + * we may experience RMI_ERROR_REC. Exit to the userspace with -EAGAIN
> + * for a retry.
> + */
> + if (status == RMI_ERROR_REC)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + if (rec_run_ret)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 = rec->run->exit.esr;
> + vcpu->arch.fault.far_el2 = rec->run->exit.far;
> + /* HPFAR_EL2 is only valid for RMI_EXIT_SYNC */
> + vcpu->arch.fault.hpfar_el2 = 0;
> +
> + update_arch_timer_irq_lines(vcpu);
> +
> + /* Reset the emulation flags for the next run of the REC */
> + rec->run->enter.flags = 0;
> +
> + switch (rec->run->exit.exit_reason) {
> + case RMI_EXIT_SYNC:
> + /*
> + * HPFAR_EL2_NS is hijacked to indicate a valid HPFAR value,
> + * see __get_fault_info()
> + */
> + vcpu->arch.fault.hpfar_el2 = rec->run->exit.hpfar | HPFAR_EL2_NS;
> + return rec_exit_handlers[esr_ec](vcpu);
> + case RMI_EXIT_IRQ:
> + case RMI_EXIT_FIQ:
> + case RMI_EXIT_SERROR:
> + return 1;
> + case RMI_EXIT_PSCI:
> + return rec_exit_psci(vcpu);
> + case RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE:
> + return rec_exit_ripas_change(vcpu);
> + }
> +
> + kvm_pr_unimpl("Unsupported exit reason: %u\n",
> + rec->run->exit.exit_reason);
> + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> index 353a5ca45e78..d8a5fb12db2d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,48 @@ static int realm_ensure_created(struct kvm *kvm)
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * kvm_rec_pre_enter - Complete operations before entering a REC
> + *
> + * Some operations require work to be completed before entering a realm. That
> + * work may require memory allocation so cannot be done in the kvm_rec_enter()
> + * call.
> + *
> + * Return: 1 if we should enter the guest
> + * 0 if we should exit to userspace
> + * < 0 if we should exit to userspace, where the return value indicates
> + * an error
> + */
> +int kvm_rec_pre_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> +
> + if (kvm_realm_state(vcpu->kvm) != REALM_STATE_ACTIVE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + switch (rec->run->exit.exit_reason) {
> + case RMI_EXIT_HOST_CALL:
> + for (int i = 0; i < REC_RUN_GPRS; i++)
> + rec->run->enter.gprs[i] = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, i);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +int noinstr kvm_rec_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
> + int ret;
> +
> + guest_state_enter_irqoff();
> + ret = rmi_rec_enter(virt_to_phys(rec->rec_page),
> + virt_to_phys(rec->run));
> + guest_state_exit_irqoff();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int kvm_create_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct user_pt_regs *vcpu_regs = vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu);
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 13:17 [PATCH v14 00/44] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 01/44] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2026-05-21 10:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:11 ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 02/44] kvm: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Steven Price
2026-05-21 10:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:11 ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 03/44] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:15 ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 04/44] arm64: RMI: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2026-05-18 7:08 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-20 16:01 ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:50 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-21 15:33 ` Steven Price
2026-05-22 9:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 05/44] arm64: RMI: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2026-05-19 5:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21 15:44 ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 0:21 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 15:44 ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:44 ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 06/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at init Steven Price
2026-05-21 0:39 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 15:49 ` Steven Price
2026-05-25 6:58 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 13:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 07/44] arm64: RMI: Configure the RMM with the host's page size Steven Price
2026-05-21 0:51 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 22:36 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-21 13:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 08/44] arm64: RMI: Ensure that the RMM has GPT entries for memory Steven Price
2026-05-19 5:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21 0:58 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 13:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:39 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 09/44] arm64: RMI: Provide functions to delegate/undelegate ranges of memory Steven Price
2026-05-21 13:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 16:01 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-22 10:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 10/44] arm64: RMI: Add support for SRO Steven Price
2026-05-14 8:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-14 9:33 ` Steven Price
2026-05-19 6:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21 4:38 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 14:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 11/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at KVM init Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 12/44] arm64: RMI: Check for LPA2 support Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 13/44] arm64: RMI: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2026-05-26 22:17 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-27 15:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 14/44] arm64: RMI: Basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-05-19 6:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-28 7:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 15/44] kvm: arm64: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 16/44] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 17/44] arm64: RMI: RTT tear down Steven Price
2026-05-19 6:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-26 22:27 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-26 22:32 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 18/44] arm64: RMI: Activate realm on first VCPU run Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 19/44] arm64: RMI: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2026-05-26 22:39 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 20/44] arm64: RMI: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2026-05-28 4:07 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 21/44] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2026-05-28 4:11 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 22/44] arm64: RMI: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2026-05-28 4:38 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 23/44] arm64: RMI: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2026-05-19 9:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-27 10:52 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 24/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2026-05-28 5:03 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 25/44] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 26/44] arm64: RMI: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2026-05-28 5:30 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 27/44] arm64: RMI: Set RIPAS of initial memslots Steven Price
2026-05-19 10:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-19 10:13 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-19 12:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-19 13:06 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 28/44] arm64: RMI: Create the realm descriptor Steven Price
2026-05-26 22:47 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-28 5:51 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 29/44] arm64: RMI: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 30/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 31/44] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 32/44] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2026-05-28 6:55 ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 33/44] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 34/44] arm64: RMI: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 35/44] arm64: RMI: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 36/44] arm64: RMI: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 37/44] arm64: RMI: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2026-05-19 10:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 38/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 39/44] arm64: RMI: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 40/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 41/44] arm64: RMI: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 42/44] arm64: RMI: Provide register list for unfinalized RMI RECs Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 43/44] arm64: RMI: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 44/44] arm64: RMI: Enable realms to be created Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6cb82fc-a8be-49d3-8fa3-0107c8ab97f7@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm.com \
--cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox