From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] cxl/region: Implement XHB verification
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 10:07:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220107100714.00004461@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220107003756.806582-10-ben.widawsky@intel.com>
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:37:52 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> Cross host bridge verification primarily determines if the requested
> interleave ordering can be achieved by the root decoder, which isn't as
> programmable as other decoders.
>
> The algorithm implemented here is based on the CXL Type 3 Memory Device
> Software Guide, chapter 2.13.14
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Hi Ben,
A few things I'm carrying 'fixes' for in here.
Jonathan
> ---
> .clang-format | 2 +
> drivers/cxl/region.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/cxl/trace.h | 3 ++
> 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/.clang-format b/.clang-format
> index 15d4eaabc6b5..55f628f21722 100644
> --- a/.clang-format
> +++ b/.clang-format
> @@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ ForEachMacros:
> - 'for_each_cpu_and'
> - 'for_each_cpu_not'
> - 'for_each_cpu_wrap'
> + - 'for_each_cxl_decoder_target'
> + - 'for_each_cxl_endpoint'
> - 'for_each_dapm_widgets'
> - 'for_each_dev_addr'
> - 'for_each_dev_scope'
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/region.c b/drivers/cxl/region.c
> index c8e3c48dfbb9..ca559a4b5347 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/region.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,17 @@
> */
>
> #define region_ways(region) ((region)->config.eniw)
> +#define region_ig(region) (ilog2((region)->config.ig))
> +
> +#define for_each_cxl_endpoint(ep, region, idx) \
> + for (idx = 0, ep = (region)->config.targets[idx]; \
> + idx < region_ways(region); \
> + idx++, ep = (region)->config.targets[idx])
> +
> +#define for_each_cxl_decoder_target(target, decoder, idx) \
> + for (idx = 0, target = (decoder)->target[idx]; \
> + idx < (decoder)->nr_targets; \
> + idx++, target++)
>
> static struct cxl_decoder *rootd_from_region(struct cxl_region *r)
> {
> @@ -175,6 +186,30 @@ static bool qtg_match(const struct cxl_decoder *rootd,
> return true;
> }
>
> +static int get_unique_hostbridges(const struct cxl_region *region,
> + struct cxl_port **hbs)
> +{
> + struct cxl_memdev *ep;
> + int i, hb_count = 0;
> +
> + for_each_cxl_endpoint(ep, region, i) {
> + struct cxl_port *hb = get_hostbridge(ep);
> + bool found = false;
> + int j;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!hb);
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < hb_count; j++) {
> + if (hbs[j] == hb)
> + found = true;
> + }
> + if (!found)
> + hbs[hb_count++] = hb;
> + }
> +
> + return hb_count;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * region_xhb_config_valid() - determine cross host bridge validity
> * @rootd: The root decoder to check against
> @@ -188,7 +223,59 @@ static bool qtg_match(const struct cxl_decoder *rootd,
> static bool region_xhb_config_valid(const struct cxl_region *region,
> const struct cxl_decoder *rootd)
> {
> - /* TODO: */
> + struct cxl_port *hbs[CXL_DECODER_MAX_INTERLEAVE];
> + int rootd_ig, i;
> + struct cxl_dport *target;
> +
> + /* Are all devices in this region on the same CXL host bridge */
> + if (get_unique_hostbridges(region, hbs) == 1)
> + return true;
> +
> + rootd_ig = rootd->interleave_granularity;
> +
> + /* CFMWS.HBIG >= Device.Label.IG */
> + if (rootd_ig < region_ig(region)) {
> + trace_xhb_valid(region,
> + "granularity does not support the region interleave granularity\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + /* ((2^(CFMWS.HBIG - Device.RLabel.IG) * (2^CFMWS.ENIW)) > Device.RLabel.NLabel) */
> + if (1 << (rootd_ig - region_ig(region)) * (1 << rootd->interleave_ways) >
This maths isn't what the comment says it is.
((1 << (rootd_ig - region_ig(region))) * rootd->interleaveways)
so brackets needed to avoid 2^( all the rest) and rootd->interleave_ways seems to the
actual number of ways not the log2 of it.
That feeds through below.
> + region_ways(region)) {
> + trace_xhb_valid(region,
> + "granularity to device granularity ratio requires a larger number of devices than currently configured");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check that endpoints are hooked up in the correct order */
> + for_each_cxl_decoder_target(target, rootd, i) {
> + struct cxl_memdev *endpoint = region->config.targets[i];
> +
> + if (get_hostbridge(endpoint) != target->port) {
I think this should be
get_hostbridge(endpoint)->uport != target->dport
As it stands you are comparing the host bridge with the root object.
> + trace_xhb_valid(region, "device ordering bad\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * CFMWS.InterleaveTargetList[n] must contain all devices, x where:
> + * (Device[x],RegionLabel.Position >> (CFMWS.HBIG -
> + * Device[x].RegionLabel.InterleaveGranularity)) &
> + * ((2^CFMWS.ENIW) - 1) = n
> + *
> + * Linux notes: All devices are known to have the same interleave
> + * granularity at this point.
> + */
> + for_each_cxl_decoder_target(target, rootd, i) {
> + if (((i >> (rootd_ig - region_ig(region)))) &
> + (((1 << rootd->interleave_ways) - 1) != target->port_id)) {
> + trace_xhb_valid(region,
> + "One or more devices are not connected to the correct hostbridge.");
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/trace.h b/drivers/cxl/trace.h
> index a53f00ba5d0e..4de47d1111ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/trace.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(cxl_region_template, sanitize_failed,
> DEFINE_EVENT(cxl_region_template, allocation_failed,
> TP_PROTO(const struct cxl_region *region, char *status),
> TP_ARGS(region, status));
> +DEFINE_EVENT(cxl_region_template, xhb_valid,
> + TP_PROTO(const struct cxl_region *region, char *status),
> + TP_ARGS(region, status));
>
> #endif /* if !defined (__CXL_TRACE_H__) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-07 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-07 0:37 [PATCH 00/13] CXL Region driver Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 01/13] cxl/core: Rename find_cxl_port Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 02/13] cxl/core: Track port depth Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 03/13] cxl/region: Add region creation ABI Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 04/13] cxl/region: Introduce concept of region configuration Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 05/13] cxl/mem: Cache port created by the mem dev Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 06/13] cxl/region: Introduce a cxl_region driver Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 07/13] cxl/acpi: Handle address space allocation Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 08/13] cxl/region: Address " Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 09/13] cxl/region: Implement XHB verification Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 10:07 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-01-07 11:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-11 22:47 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 10:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-07 10:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-07 16:32 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-11 21:32 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 10/13] cxl/region: HB port config verification Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 11/13] cxl/region: Add infrastructure for decoder programming Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 12/13] cxl/region: Record host bridge target list Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 18:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-07 19:20 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 13/13] cxl: Program decoders for regions Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 16:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-07 16:33 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-07 17:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-11 0:05 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-12 14:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-12 16:54 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-15 18:54 ` [PATCH 00/13] CXL Region driver Ben Widawsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220107100714.00004461@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox