From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vishal.l.verma@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cxl: Add CXL spec v3.0 interleave support
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 16:19:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <638867f4-214b-eba3-6bf3-9aa4fb85fa53@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62f2895635e69_1f18b29456@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
On 8/9/2022 9:20 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Dave Jiang wrote:
>> CXL spec v3.0 added 2 CAP bits to the CXL HDM Decoder Capability Register.
>> CXL spec v3.0 8.2.4.19.1. Bit 11 indicates that 3, 6, and 12 way interleave
>> is capable. Bit 12 indicates that 16 way interleave is capable.
>>
>> Add code to parse_hdm_decoder_caps() to cache those new bits. Add check in
>> cxl_interleave_verify() call to make sure those CAP bits matches the passed
>> in interleave value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c | 4 ++++
>> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 2 ++
>> drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
>> index 8143e2615957..50ff7387e425 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
>> @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ static void parse_hdm_decoder_caps(struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm)
>> cxlhdm->interleave_mask |= GENMASK(11, 8);
>> if (FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_14_12, hdm_cap))
>> cxlhdm->interleave_mask |= GENMASK(14, 12);
>> + if (FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_3_6_12_WAY, hdm_cap))
>> + cxlhdm->interleave_3_6_12 = true;
>> + if (FIELD_GET(CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_16_WAY, hdm_cap))
>> + cxlhdm->interleave_16 = true;
>> }
>>
>> static void __iomem *map_hdm_decoder_regs(struct cxl_port *port,
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>> index 275979fbd15a..db9631d09dd0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
>> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_TARGET_COUNT_MASK GENMASK(7, 4)
>> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_11_8 BIT(8)
>> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_14_12 BIT(9)
>> +#define CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_3_6_12_WAY BIT(11)
>> +#define CXL_HDM_DECODER_INTERLEAVE_16_WAY BIT(12)
>> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_CTRL_OFFSET 0x4
>> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER_ENABLE BIT(1)
>> #define CXL_HDM_DECODER0_BASE_LOW_OFFSET(i) (0x20 * (i) + 0x10)
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
>> index d5f872ca62f9..9b4b23b3b78a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
>> @@ -398,9 +398,35 @@ struct cxl_hdm {
>> unsigned int decoder_count;
>> unsigned int target_count;
>> unsigned int interleave_mask;
>> + bool interleave_3_6_12;
>> + bool interleave_16;
>> struct cxl_port *port;
>> };
>>
>> +static inline bool valid_interleave(struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm, u8 iw)
>> +{
>> + switch (iw) {
>> + case CXL_INTERLEAVE_1_WAY:
>> + case CXL_INTERLEAVE_2_WAY:
>> + case CXL_INTERLEAVE_4_WAY:
>> + case CXL_INTERLEAVE_8_WAY:
>> + return true;
>> + case CXL_INTERLEAVE_16_WAY:
>> + if (!cxlhdm->interleave_16)
>> + return false;
>> + return true;
>> + case CXL_INTERLEAVE_3_WAY:
>> + case CXL_INTERLEAVE_6_WAY:
>> + case CXL_INTERLEAVE_12_WAY:
>> + if (!cxlhdm->interleave_3_6_12)
>> + return false;
>> + return true;
>> + default:
>> + };
>> +
>> + return false;
> I'd prefer something more compact like
>
> test_bit(iw, &port->interleave_cap)
>
> ...where interleave_cap is just a mask with bits 1,2,3,4,6,8,12,16
> optionally set.
ok
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-11 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-08 21:06 [PATCH 0/3] Add sanity check for interleave setup Dave Jiang
2022-08-08 21:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] cxl: Add check for result of interleave ways plus granularity combo Dave Jiang
2022-08-09 16:18 ` Dan Williams
2022-08-11 23:18 ` Dave Jiang
2022-08-09 17:06 ` Alison Schofield
2022-08-11 23:33 ` Dave Jiang
2022-08-08 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] cxl: Add CXL spec v3.0 interleave support Dave Jiang
2022-08-09 16:20 ` Dan Williams
2022-08-11 23:19 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2022-08-08 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] tools/testing/cxl: Add interleave check support to mock cxl port device Dave Jiang
2022-08-09 16:21 ` Dan Williams
2022-08-11 23:22 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=638867f4-214b-eba3-6bf3-9aa4fb85fa53@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox