RE: [PATCH v10 07/15] cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port AER register discovery

[Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>]

Terry Bowman wrote:
> Restricted CXL host (RCH) downstream port AER information is not currently
> logged while in the error state. One problem preventing the error logging
> is the AER and RAS registers are not accessible. The CXL driver requires
> changes to find RCH downstream port AER and RAS registers for purpose of
> error logging.
> 
> RCH downstream ports are not enumerated during a PCI bus scan and are
> instead discovered using system firmware, ACPI in this case.[1] The
> downstream port is implemented as a Root Complex Register Block (RCRB).
> The RCRB is a 4k memory block containing PCIe registers based on the PCIe
> root port.[2] The RCRB includes AER extended capability registers used for
> reporting errors. Note, the RCH's AER Capability is located in the RCRB
> memory space instead of PCI configuration space, thus its register access
> is different. Existing kernel PCIe AER functions can not be used to manage
> the downstream port AER capabilities and RAS registers because the port was
> not enumerated during PCI scan and the registers are not PCI config
> accessible.
> 
> Discover RCH downstream port AER extended capability registers. Use MMIO
> accesses to search for extended AER capability in RCRB register space.
> 
> [1] CXL 3.0 Spec, 9.11.2 - System Firmware View of CXL 1.1 Hierarchy
> [2] CXL 3.0 Spec, 8.2.1.1 - RCH Downstream Port RCRB
> 
> Co-developed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/core.h |  1 +
>  drivers/cxl/core/port.c |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/cxl/core/regs.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> index 45e7e044cf4a..f470ef5c0a6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ struct cxl_rcrb_info;
>  resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev,
>  				    struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri,
>  				    enum cxl_rcrb which);
> +u16 cxl_rcrb_to_aer(struct device *dev, resource_size_t rcrb);
>  
>  extern struct rw_semaphore cxl_dpa_rwsem;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> index 9151ec5b879b..da4f1b303d6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> @@ -979,6 +979,8 @@ __devm_cxl_add_dport(struct cxl_port *port, struct device *dport_dev,
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	if (rcrb != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE) {
> +		struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
> +
>  		dport->rcrb.base = rcrb;
>  		component_reg_phys = __rcrb_to_component(dport_dev, &dport->rcrb,
>  							 CXL_RCRB_DOWNSTREAM);
> @@ -987,6 +989,10 @@ __devm_cxl_add_dport(struct cxl_port *port, struct device *dport_dev,
>  			return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
>  		}
>  
> +		host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(dport_dev);
> +		if (host_bridge->native_cxl_error)
> +			dport->rcrb.aer_cap = cxl_rcrb_to_aer(dport_dev, dport->rcrb.base);
> +

Minor comment...

Is there a need to gate the discovery of the registers on the ACPI
setting? For example cxl_pci unconditionally enumerates the RAS
component register block but gates *using* them by ->native_cxl_error.