From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>, <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
<bwidawsk@kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <rrichter@amd.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/27] cxl/acpi: Probe RCRB later during RCH downstream port creation
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 15:36:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f6b4669-78ae-3244-a15a-c893c617fde0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622035126.4130151-3-terry.bowman@amd.com>
On 6/21/23 20:51, Terry Bowman wrote:
> From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
>
> The RCRB is extracted already during ACPI CEDT table parsing while the
> data of this is needed not earlier than dport creation. This
> implementation comes with drawbacks: During ACPI table scan there is
> already MMIO access including mapping and unmapping, but only ACPI
> data should be collected here. The collected data must be transferred
> through a couple of interfaces until it is finally consumed when
> creating the dport. This causes complex data structures and function
> interfaces. Additionally, RCRB parsing will be extended to also
> extract AER data, it would be much easier do this at a later point
> during port and dport creation when the data structures are available
> to hold that data.
>
> To simplify all that, probe the RCRB at a later point during RCH
> downstream port creation. Change ACPI table parser to only extract the
> base address of either the component registers or the RCRB. Parse and
> extract the RCRB in devm_cxl_add_rch_dport().
>
> This is in preparation to centralize all RCRB scanning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++------------------------
> drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 21 +++++++++++++----
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> index 7e1765b09e04..70cd9ac73a8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> @@ -372,21 +372,21 @@ static int add_host_bridge_uport(struct device *match, void *arg)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Note, @dev is used by mock_acpi_table_parse_cedt() */
> struct cxl_chbs_context {
> struct device *dev;
> unsigned long long uid;
> - resource_size_t rcrb;
> - resource_size_t chbcr;
> + resource_size_t base;
> u32 cxl_version;
> };
>
> -static int cxl_get_chbcr(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
> +static int cxl_get_chbs(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
> const unsigned long end)
> {
> struct cxl_chbs_context *ctx = arg;
> struct acpi_cedt_chbs *chbs;
>
> - if (ctx->chbcr)
> + if (ctx->base)
> return 0;
>
> chbs = (struct acpi_cedt_chbs *) header;
> @@ -395,23 +395,16 @@ static int cxl_get_chbcr(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
> return 0;
>
> ctx->cxl_version = chbs->cxl_version;
> - ctx->rcrb = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> - ctx->chbcr = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> + ctx->base = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
>
> if (!chbs->base)
> return 0;
>
> - if (chbs->cxl_version != ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11) {
> - ctx->chbcr = chbs->base;
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (chbs->length != CXL_RCRB_SIZE)
> + if (chbs->cxl_version == ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11 &&
> + chbs->length != CXL_RCRB_SIZE)
> return 0;
>
> - ctx->rcrb = chbs->base;
> - ctx->chbcr = cxl_rcrb_to_component(ctx->dev, chbs->base,
> - CXL_RCRB_DOWNSTREAM);
> + ctx->base = chbs->base;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -443,33 +436,31 @@ static int add_host_bridge_dport(struct device *match, void *arg)
> .dev = match,
> .uid = uid,
> };
> - acpi_table_parse_cedt(ACPI_CEDT_TYPE_CHBS, cxl_get_chbcr, &ctx);
> + acpi_table_parse_cedt(ACPI_CEDT_TYPE_CHBS, cxl_get_chbs, &ctx);
>
> - if (!ctx.chbcr) {
> + if (!ctx.base) {
> dev_warn(match, "No CHBS found for Host Bridge (UID %lld)\n",
> uid);
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (ctx.rcrb != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
> - dev_dbg(match, "RCRB found for UID %lld: %pa\n", uid, &ctx.rcrb);
> -
> - if (ctx.chbcr == CXL_RESOURCE_NONE) {
> - dev_warn(match, "CHBCR invalid for Host Bridge (UID %lld)\n",
> + if (ctx.base == CXL_RESOURCE_NONE) {
> + dev_warn(match, "CHBS invalid for Host Bridge (UID %lld)\n",
> uid);
> return 0;
> }
>
> - dev_dbg(match, "CHBCR found: %pa\n", &ctx.chbcr);
> -
> pci_root = acpi_pci_find_root(hb->handle);
> bridge = pci_root->bus->bridge;
> - if (ctx.cxl_version == ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11)
> - dport = devm_cxl_add_rch_dport(root_port, bridge, uid,
> - ctx.chbcr, ctx.rcrb);
> - else
> - dport = devm_cxl_add_dport(root_port, bridge, uid,
> - ctx.chbcr);
> +
> + if (ctx.cxl_version == ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11) {
> + dev_dbg(match, "RCRB found for UID %lld: %pa\n", uid, &ctx.base);
> + dport = devm_cxl_add_rch_dport(root_port, bridge, uid, ctx.base);
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(match, "CHBCR found for UID %lld: %pa\n", uid, &ctx.base);
> + dport = devm_cxl_add_dport(root_port, bridge, uid, ctx.base);
> + }
> +
> if (IS_ERR(dport))
> return PTR_ERR(dport);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> index e7c284c890bc..1a3f8729a616 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> @@ -938,12 +938,25 @@ __devm_cxl_add_dport(struct cxl_port *port, struct device *dport_dev,
> if (!dport)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> + if (rcrb != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE) {
> + component_reg_phys = cxl_rcrb_to_component(dport_dev,
> + rcrb, CXL_RCRB_DOWNSTREAM);
> + if (component_reg_phys == CXL_RESOURCE_NONE) {
> + dev_warn(dport_dev, "Invalid Component Registers in RCRB");
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> + }
> +
> + dport->rch = true;
> + }
> +
> + if (component_reg_phys != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
> + dev_dbg(dport_dev, "Component Registers found for dport: %pa\n",
> + &component_reg_phys);
> +
> dport->dport = dport_dev;
> dport->port_id = port_id;
> dport->component_reg_phys = component_reg_phys;
> dport->port = port;
> - if (rcrb != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
> - dport->rch = true;
> dport->rcrb = rcrb;
>
> cond_cxl_root_lock(port);
> @@ -1004,14 +1017,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(devm_cxl_add_dport, CXL);
> * @port: the cxl_port that references this dport
> * @dport_dev: firmware or PCI device representing the dport
> * @port_id: identifier for this dport in a decoder's target list
> - * @component_reg_phys: optional location of CXL component registers
> * @rcrb: mandatory location of a Root Complex Register Block
> *
> * See CXL 3.0 9.11.8 CXL Devices Attached to an RCH
> */
> struct cxl_dport *devm_cxl_add_rch_dport(struct cxl_port *port,
> struct device *dport_dev, int port_id,
> - resource_size_t component_reg_phys,
> resource_size_t rcrb)
> {
> struct cxl_dport *dport;
> @@ -1022,7 +1033,7 @@ struct cxl_dport *devm_cxl_add_rch_dport(struct cxl_port *port,
> }
>
> dport = __devm_cxl_add_dport(port, dport_dev, port_id,
> - component_reg_phys, rcrb);
> + CXL_RESOURCE_NONE, rcrb);
> if (IS_ERR(dport)) {
> dev_dbg(dport_dev, "failed to add RCH dport to %s: %ld\n",
> dev_name(&port->dev), PTR_ERR(dport));
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index f93a28538962..a5cd661face2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -671,7 +671,6 @@ struct cxl_dport *devm_cxl_add_dport(struct cxl_port *port,
> resource_size_t component_reg_phys);
> struct cxl_dport *devm_cxl_add_rch_dport(struct cxl_port *port,
> struct device *dport_dev, int port_id,
> - resource_size_t component_reg_phys,
> resource_size_t rcrb);
>
> struct cxl_decoder *to_cxl_decoder(struct device *dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-22 3:50 [PATCH v6 00/27] cxl/pci: Add support for RCH RAS error handling Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 01/27] cxl/port: Fix NULL pointer access in devm_cxl_add_port() Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 7:17 ` Robert Richter
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 02/27] cxl/acpi: Probe RCRB later during RCH downstream port creation Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 22:36 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 03/27] cxl: Updates for CXL Test to work with RCH Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 9:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 10:03 ` Robert Richter
2023-06-22 14:02 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 22:38 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 04/27] cxl/rch: Prepare for caching the MMIO mapped PCIe AER capability Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 22:51 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 05/27] cxl: Rename member @dport of struct cxl_dport to @dport_dev Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 9:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 22:53 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 06/27] cxl: Rename 'uport' to 'uport_dev' Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 9:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 22:54 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 07/27] cxl/core/regs: Add @dev to cxl_register_map Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 11:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 23:07 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 08/27] cxl/pci: Refactor component register discovery for reuse Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:14 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 09/27] cxl/acpi: Move add_host_bridge_uport() after cxl_get_chbs() Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:17 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 10/27] cxl/acpi: Directly bind the CEDT detected CHBCR to the Host Bridge's port Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:28 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 11/27] cxl/port: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_dport Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:47 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 12/27] cxl/regs: Remove early capability checks in Component Register setup Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:48 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 13/27] cxl/mem: Prepare for early RCH dport component register setup Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 11:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 23:50 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 14/27] cxl/pci: Early setup RCH dport component registers from RCRB Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:58 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 15/27] cxl/port: Store the port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_port Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-23 0:00 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 16/27] cxl/port: Store the downstream port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_dport Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 0:01 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 17/27] cxl/pci: Store the endpoint's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_dev_state Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 0:02 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 18/27] cxl/hdm: Use stored Component Register mappings to map HDM decoder capability Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 0:03 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 19/27] cxl/port: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_port Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 0:04 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 20/27] cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port AER register discovery Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-23 0:10 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 21/27] PCI/AER: Refactor cper_print_aer() for use by CXL driver module Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 22/27] cxl/pci: Update CXL error logging to use RAS register address Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 23/27] cxl/pci: Map RCH downstream AER registers for logging protocol errors Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 14:42 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 24/27] cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port error logging Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 25/27] cxl/pci: Disable root port interrupts in RCH mode Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 16:33 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 13:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 26/27] PCI/AER: Forward RCH downstream port-detected errors to the CXL.mem dev handler Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 27/27] PCI/AER: Unmask RCEC internal errors to enable RCH downstream port error handling Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f6b4669-78ae-3244-a15a-c893c617fde0@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox