* [PATCH 0/5] drm/panel: jd9365da: add support for DCLTek DT300250
@ 2026-07-08 21:34 Marc-Olivier Champagne
2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Enable LPM mode Marc-Olivier Champagne
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jagan Teki, Neil Armstrong, Jessica Zhang, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Zimmermann, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
Cc: Hugo Villeneuve, Marc-Olivier Champagne, dri-devel, devicetree,
linux-kernel, Jerome Oufella, Felix Boucher, Quentin Lehoux
This series adds support for the DCLTek DT300250 9.35-inch MIPI DSI
panel based on the Jadard JD9365DA-H3 controller.
The series includes the prerequisites needed by this panel support:
enable LPM mode for the jd9365da path and add the prepare_prev_first
flag to drm_panel. It then adds the dcltek vendor prefix, documents
the new compatible string in the binding, and finally adds the panel
descriptor and initialization sequence to the driver.
Marc-Olivier Champagne (5):
drm: panel: jd9365da: Enable LPM mode
drm: panel: jd9365da: Add prepare_prev_first flag to drm_panel
dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add DCLTEK
dt-bindings: display: panel: add compatible for DCLTek 300250 9.35in
panel
drm: panel: jd9365da: Add DCLTek 300250 9.35in display
.../display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml | 1 +
.../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 +
.../gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c | 251 +++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
base-commit: dc59e4fea9d83f03bad6bddf3fa2e52491777482
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Enable LPM mode 2026-07-08 21:34 [PATCH 0/5] drm/panel: jd9365da: add support for DCLTek DT300250 Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:34 ` Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add prepare_prev_first flag to drm_panel Marc-Olivier Champagne ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jagan Teki, Neil Armstrong, Jessica Zhang, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley Cc: Hugo Villeneuve, Marc-Olivier Champagne, dri-devel, devicetree, linux-kernel, Jerome Oufella, Felix Boucher, Quentin Lehoux The JD9365DA-H3 uses DSI LPM for command transmissions, make sure this is configured correctly in the DSI mode flags. Suggested-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> Signed-off-by: Marc-Olivier Champagne <marc-olivier.champagne@savoirfairelinux.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c index f6b04de1182e..1ef0c937863a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c @@ -2950,7 +2950,8 @@ static int jadard_dsi_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi) else dsi->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST | - MIPI_DSI_MODE_NO_EOT_PACKET; + MIPI_DSI_MODE_NO_EOT_PACKET | + MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM; dsi->format = desc->format; dsi->lanes = desc->lanes; -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add prepare_prev_first flag to drm_panel 2026-07-08 21:34 [PATCH 0/5] drm/panel: jd9365da: add support for DCLTek DT300250 Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Enable LPM mode Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:34 ` Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:53 ` sashiko-bot 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add DCLTEK Marc-Olivier Champagne ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jagan Teki, Neil Armstrong, Jessica Zhang, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley Cc: Hugo Villeneuve, Marc-Olivier Champagne, dri-devel, devicetree, linux-kernel, Jerome Oufella, Felix Boucher, Quentin Lehoux The DSI host must be enabled for the panel to be initialized in prepare(). Set the prepare_prev_first flag to guarantee this. This fixes the panel operation on Renesas RZ/G2LC SoC DSI host. Suggested-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> Signed-off-by: Marc-Olivier Champagne <marc-olivier.champagne@savoirfairelinux.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c index 1ef0c937863a..a79dc8f8d5af 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c @@ -2993,6 +2993,8 @@ static int jadard_dsi_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi) return dev_err_probe(&dsi->dev, PTR_ERR(jadard->vccio), "failed to get vccio regulator\n"); + jadard->panel.prepare_prev_first = true; + ret = of_drm_get_panel_orientation(dev->of_node, &jadard->orientation); if (ret < 0) return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get orientation\n"); -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add prepare_prev_first flag to drm_panel 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add prepare_prev_first flag to drm_panel Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:53 ` sashiko-bot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-08 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc-Olivier Champagne; +Cc: devicetree, robh, conor+dt, dri-devel Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider: New issues: - [Low] Redundant duplicate assignment of `prepare_prev_first` flag. Pre-existing issues: - [High] Missing cleanup in the error paths of `jadard_prepare()` causes a permanent leak of the regulator enable counts. - [High] Premature publication of the panel in `jadard_dsi_probe()` allows a race condition leading to a NULL pointer dereference. -- --- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add prepare_prev_first flag to drm_panel --- commit 1a793dbc7476444fc7003da84dbce8a3bff9ad98 Author: Marc-Olivier Champagne <marc-olivier.champagne@savoirfairelinux.com> drm: panel: jd9365da: Add prepare_prev_first flag to drm_panel The DSI host must be enabled for the panel to be initialized in prepare(). Set the prepare_prev_first flag to guarantee this. This fixes the panel operation on Renesas RZ/G2LC SoC DSI host. > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c > index 1ef0c937863a2..a79dc8f8d5af9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c > @@ -2993,6 +2993,8 @@ static int jadard_dsi_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi) > return dev_err_probe(&dsi->dev, PTR_ERR(jadard->vccio), > "failed to get vccio regulator\n"); > > + jadard->panel.prepare_prev_first = true; > + [Severity: Low] Does this introduce a redundant assignment? Looking further down in jadard_dsi_probe(), the exact same flag appears to be set again just before panel registration: jadard_dsi_probe() { ... jadard->panel.prepare_prev_first = true; drm_panel_add(&jadard->panel); ... } Can we remove one of these duplicate assignments? [Severity: High] This is a pre-existing issue, but does jadard_prepare() leak regulator reference counts on error paths? If regulator_enable(jadard->vccio) succeeds, but a subsequent step fails: jadard_prepare() { ... ret = regulator_enable(jadard->vccio); ... ret = regulator_enable(jadard->vdd); if (ret) return ret; and later with mipi_dsi_dcs_nop(): ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_nop(jadard->dsi); if (ret) return ret; } The function returns without disabling the previously enabled regulators. Because the panel prepare fails, the DRM core won't mark it as prepared, and jadard_unprepare() will never be called to clean up. Can this prevent the system from entering low-power states or re-initializing the display properly? [Severity: High] This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is there a race condition with premature panel publication in jadard_dsi_probe()? The panel is added to the global list before its required internal pointers are initialized: jadard_dsi_probe() { ... drm_panel_add(&jadard->panel); mipi_dsi_set_drvdata(dsi, jadard); jadard->dsi = dsi; jadard->desc = desc; } If a display controller finds the panel concurrently (e.g., via probe deferral resolution) and calls drm_panel_prepare(), jadard_prepare() could execute before jadard_dsi_probe() finishes: jadard_prepare() { ... if (jadard->desc->vcioo_to_lp11_delay_ms) ... } Can this dereference a NULL jadard->desc pointer? Should drm_panel_add() be moved to the very end of the probe function? -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708213500.1867092-1-marc-olivier.champagne@savoirfairelinux.com?part=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add DCLTEK 2026-07-08 21:34 [PATCH 0/5] drm/panel: jd9365da: add support for DCLTek DT300250 Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Enable LPM mode Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add prepare_prev_first flag to drm_panel Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:34 ` Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: display: panel: add compatible for DCLTek 300250 9.35in panel Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add DCLTek 300250 9.35in display Marc-Olivier Champagne 4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jagan Teki, Neil Armstrong, Jessica Zhang, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley Cc: Hugo Villeneuve, Marc-Olivier Champagne, dri-devel, devicetree, linux-kernel, Jerome Oufella, Felix Boucher, Quentin Lehoux Add DCL Technologies Inc. (DCLTEK) to the devicetree vendor prefixes registry. Link: https://www.dcltek.com/ Signed-off-by: Marc-Olivier Champagne <marc-olivier.champagne@savoirfairelinux.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml index 396044f368e7..1e7af6de2afe 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml @@ -407,6 +407,8 @@ patternProperties: description: DataImage, Inc. "^davicom,.*": description: DAVICOM Semiconductor, Inc. + "^dcltek,.*": + description: DCL Technologies Inc. "^deepcomputing,.*": description: DeepComputing (HK) Limited "^dell,.*": -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: display: panel: add compatible for DCLTek 300250 9.35in panel 2026-07-08 21:34 [PATCH 0/5] drm/panel: jd9365da: add support for DCLTek DT300250 Marc-Olivier Champagne ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add DCLTEK Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:34 ` Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:54 ` sashiko-bot 2026-07-08 21:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add DCLTek 300250 9.35in display Marc-Olivier Champagne 4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jagan Teki, Neil Armstrong, Jessica Zhang, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley Cc: Hugo Villeneuve, Marc-Olivier Champagne, dri-devel, devicetree, linux-kernel, Jerome Oufella, Felix Boucher, Quentin Lehoux The DCLTek dt300250 is a panel using the jadard-jd9365da controller. Add a new compatible for it. Suggested-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> Signed-off-by: Marc-Olivier Champagne <marc-olivier.champagne@savoirfairelinux.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml index 4eae802de9fd..9e20e2faf82f 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties: - anbernic,rg-ds-display-bottom - anbernic,rg-ds-display-top - chongzhou,cz101b4001 + - dcltek,dt300250 - kingdisplay,kd101ne3-40ti - melfas,lmfbx101117480 - radxa,display-10hd-ad001 -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: display: panel: add compatible for DCLTek 300250 9.35in panel 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: display: panel: add compatible for DCLTek 300250 9.35in panel Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:54 ` sashiko-bot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-08 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc-Olivier Champagne; +Cc: robh, conor+dt, devicetree, dri-devel Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] The newly added compatible string `dcltek,dt300250` will not be probed by the panel driver due to missing `of_match_table` entry. - [Low] Redundant assignment of `jadard->panel.prepare_prev_first = true;`. -- --- Patch [4]: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: display: panel: add compatible for DCLTek 300250 9.35in panel --- commit eaec789ca9baff9cff690aca5a539d1f1eb81d5f Author: Marc-Olivier Champagne <marc-olivier.champagne@savoirfairelinux.com> dt-bindings: display: panel: add compatible for DCLTek 300250 9.35in panel The DCLTek dt300250 is a panel using the jadard-jd9365da controller. Add a new compatible for it. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml > index 4eae802de9fd5..9e20e2faf82fa 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jadard,jd9365da-h3.yaml > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties: > - anbernic,rg-ds-display-bottom > - anbernic,rg-ds-display-top > - chongzhou,cz101b4001 > + - dcltek,dt300250 [Severity: Medium] Will the panel driver successfully bind to this new compatible string? Looking at jadard_of_match in drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c, it seems neither this new compatible string nor a generic fallback is present in the match table: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c:jadard_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "anbernic,rg-ds-display-bottom", ... Without a matching entry in the of_match_table, does this regression cause the device to fail to probe? [Severity: Low] Looking at the driver changes introduced earlier in this series by commit 1a793dbc7476, is there a redundant assignment to prepare_prev_first? drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c:jadard_dsi_probe() { ... jadard->panel.prepare_prev_first = true; ... jadard->panel.prepare_prev_first = true; ... } Could this regression be a duplicated assignment in the same function? > - kingdisplay,kd101ne3-40ti > - melfas,lmfbx101117480 > - radxa,display-10hd-ad001 -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708213500.1867092-1-marc-olivier.champagne@savoirfairelinux.com?part=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add DCLTek 300250 9.35in display 2026-07-08 21:34 [PATCH 0/5] drm/panel: jd9365da: add support for DCLTek DT300250 Marc-Olivier Champagne ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: display: panel: add compatible for DCLTek 300250 9.35in panel Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:35 ` Marc-Olivier Champagne 4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Marc-Olivier Champagne @ 2026-07-08 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jagan Teki, Neil Armstrong, Jessica Zhang, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley Cc: Hugo Villeneuve, Marc-Olivier Champagne, dri-devel, devicetree, linux-kernel, Jerome Oufella, Felix Boucher, Quentin Lehoux The DCLTek dt300250 is a LCD panel using the jd9365da controller. Add the panel to the driver. Suggested-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> Signed-off-by: Marc-Olivier Champagne <marc-olivier.champagne@savoirfairelinux.com> --- .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c | 246 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 246 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c index a79dc8f8d5af..970c64d6054d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c @@ -2931,6 +2931,248 @@ static const struct jadard_panel_desc waveshare_10_1_inch_b_desc = { MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM | MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS, }; +static int dcltek_dt300250_init_cmds(struct jadard *jadard) +{ + struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = jadard->dsi }; + + jd9365da_switch_page(&dsi_ctx, 0x00); + jadard_enable_standard_cmds(&dsi_ctx); + + jd9365da_switch_page(&dsi_ctx, 0x01); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x00, 0x00); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x01, 0x2B); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x03, 0x10); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x04, 0x2B); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x0C, 0x74); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x17, 0x00); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x18, 0xCF); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x19, 0x01); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x1A, 0x00); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x1B, 0xCF); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x1C, 0x01); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x24, 0xFE); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x37, 0x09); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x38, 0x04); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x39, 0x00); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3A, 0x01); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3C, 0x5C); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3D, 0xFF); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3E, 0xFF); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3F, 0x7F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x40, 0x02); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x41, 0xC8); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x42, 0x66); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x43, 0x10); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x44, 0x0F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x45, 0x28); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x55, 0x02); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x57, 0x8D); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x59, 0x0A); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5A, 0x29); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5B, 0x1A); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5D, 0x7F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5E, 0x65); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5F, 0x53); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x60, 0x45); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x61, 0x3E); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x62, 0x30); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x63, 0x33); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x64, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x65, 0x3B); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x66, 0x3C); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x67, 0x3F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x68, 0x5D); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x69, 0x49); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6A, 0x4D); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6B, 0x3D); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6C, 0x37); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6D, 0x28); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6E, 0x15); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6F, 0x00); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x70, 0x7F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x71, 0x65); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x72, 0x53); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x73, 0x45); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x74, 0x3E); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x75, 0x30); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x76, 0x33); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x77, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x78, 0x3B); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x79, 0x3C); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x7A, 0x3F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x7B, 0x5D); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x7C, 0x49); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x7D, 0x4D); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x7E, 0x3D); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x7F, 0x44); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x80, 0x28); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x81, 0x15); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x82, 0x00); + + jd9365da_switch_page(&dsi_ctx, 0x02); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x00, 0x41); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x01, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x02, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x03, 0x4B); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x04, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x05, 0x5C); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x06, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x07, 0x49); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x08, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x09, 0x5A); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x0A, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x0B, 0x47); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x0C, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x0D, 0x4F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x0E, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x0F, 0x45); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x10, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x11, 0x4D); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x12, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x13, 0x5E); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x14, 0x51); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x15, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x16, 0x40); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x17, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x18, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x19, 0x4A); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x1A, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x1B, 0x5B); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x1C, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x1D, 0x48); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x1E, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x1F, 0x59); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x20, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x21, 0x46); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x22, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x23, 0x4E); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x24, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x25, 0x44); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x26, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x27, 0x4C); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x28, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x29, 0x5E); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x2A, 0x50); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x2B, 0x5F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x2C, 0x10); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x2D, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x2E, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x2F, 0x0C); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x30, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x31, 0x04); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x32, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x33, 0x0E); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x34, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x35, 0x06); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x36, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x37, 0x19); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x38, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x39, 0x08); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3A, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3B, 0x1B); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3C, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3D, 0x0A); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3E, 0x1E); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x3F, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x40, 0x00); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x41, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x42, 0x11); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x43, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x44, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x45, 0x0D); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x46, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x47, 0x05); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x48, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x49, 0x0F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x4A, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x4B, 0x07); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x4C, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x4D, 0x1A); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x4E, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x4F, 0x09); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x50, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x51, 0x1C); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x52, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x53, 0x0B); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x54, 0x1E); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x55, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x56, 0x01); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x57, 0x1F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x58, 0x40); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5B, 0x10); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5C, 0x01); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5D, 0x70); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5E, 0x01); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x5F, 0x02); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x60, 0x70); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x61, 0x01); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x62, 0x02); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x63, 0x06); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x64, 0x4A); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x65, 0x56); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x66, 0x4F); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x67, 0xF7); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x68, 0x01); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x69, 0x06); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6A, 0x4A); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6B, 0x10); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6C, 0x00); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6D, 0x00); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6E, 0x00); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x6F, 0x88); + + jd9365da_switch_page(&dsi_ctx, 0x04); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x00, 0x0E); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x02, 0xB3); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x09, 0x60); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x0e, 0x4A); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x37, 0x58); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x2b, 0x0F); + + jd9365da_switch_page(&dsi_ctx, 0x05); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x15, 0x34); + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x16, 0x76); + + jd9365da_switch_page(&dsi_ctx, 0x00); + + mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 120); + + mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx); + + mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 120); + + mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on_multi(&dsi_ctx); + + mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 20); + + mipi_dsi_dcs_set_tear_on_multi(&dsi_ctx, MIPI_DSI_DCS_TEAR_MODE_VBLANK); + + return dsi_ctx.accum_err; +} + +static const struct jadard_panel_desc dcltek_dt300250_desc = { + .mode_4ln = &(const struct drm_display_mode) { + .clock = (600 + 48 + 32 + 80) * (1600 + 18 + 6 + 23) * 60 / 1000, + + .hdisplay = 600, + .hsync_start = 600 + 48, + .hsync_end = 600 + 48 + 32, + .htotal = 600 + 48 + 32 + 80, + + .vdisplay = 1600, + .vsync_start = 1600 + 18, + .vsync_end = 1600 + 18 + 6, + .vtotal = 1600 + 18 + 6 + 23, + + .width_mm = 83, + .height_mm = 221, + .type = DRM_MODE_TYPE_DRIVER | DRM_MODE_TYPE_PREFERRED, + }, + .lanes = 4, + .format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888, + .init = dcltek_dt300250_init_cmds, +}; + static int jadard_dsi_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi) { struct device *dev = &dsi->dev; @@ -3039,6 +3281,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id jadard_of_match[] = { .compatible = "chongzhou,cz101b4001", .data = &cz101b4001_desc }, + { + .compatible = "dcltek,dt300250", + .data = &dcltek_dt300250_desc + }, { .compatible = "kingdisplay,kd101ne3-40ti", .data = &kingdisplay_kd101ne3_40ti_desc -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-08 21:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-07-08 21:34 [PATCH 0/5] drm/panel: jd9365da: add support for DCLTek DT300250 Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Enable LPM mode Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add prepare_prev_first flag to drm_panel Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:53 ` sashiko-bot 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add DCLTEK Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: display: panel: add compatible for DCLTek 300250 9.35in panel Marc-Olivier Champagne 2026-07-08 21:54 ` sashiko-bot 2026-07-08 21:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm: panel: jd9365da: Add DCLTek 300250 9.35in display Marc-Olivier Champagne
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox