From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Shawn Guo" <shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord GearVM variant
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 13:51:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709135120.7C1D81F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709132013.4096850-3-shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] SCMI providers `scmi3` and `scmi11` are left disabled by default, causing indefinite probe deferral for their consumers.
- [High] SCMI nodes scmi57 through scmi63 use GIC_ESPI 32-38 with conflicting trigger types, overlapping the statically assigned apps_smmu_0 interrupts.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord GearVM variant ---
commit 4395a14fff5eeaf5f222d6a5a7f0fa310adfb7bf
Author: Deepti Jaggi <deepti.jaggi@oss.qualcomm.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord GearVM variant
This patch adds a device tree include for the Nord GearVM variant. It covers
SCMI shared memory regions, GENI SE QUP blocks (I2C/SPI/UART), and the UFS
host controller which use SCMI for power and performance domains.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord-gearvm.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord-gearvm.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..8f29b5f24ef8c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord-gearvm.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,2847 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries.
> + */
> +
> +#include "nord.dtsi"
> +
> +&firmware {
[ ... ]
> + scmi57: scmi-57 {
> + compatible = "qcom,scmi-smc";
> + arm,smc-id = <0xc6008012>;
> + shmem = <&shmem57>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_ESPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
[Severity: High]
Does this interrupt mapping conflict with the SMMU context bank interrupts?
scmi57 through scmi63 claim GIC_ESPI 32 through 38 with IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING,
but these physical lines perfectly overlap with apps_smmu_0, which statically
claims them as IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH from the base nord.dtsi without being
overridden.
The kernel's IRQ subsystem will likely reject mapping the same physical
interrupt with conflicting trigger types, leading to a probe failure for either
the SMMU or the SCMI channels.
> + interrupt-names = "a2p";
[ ... ]
> +&i2c0 {
> + compatible = "qcom,sa8797p-geni-i2c",
> + "qcom,sa8255p-geni-i2c";
> + power-domains = <&scmi11_pd 0>,
> + <&scmi11_dvfs 0>;
[Severity: High]
Since this consumer strictly relies on scmi11_pd, will it face indefinite probe
deferral because the scmi-11 provider is left disabled by default in this
variant DT?
The same issue appears to apply to ufs_mem_hc, which relies on scmi3_pd
but has its provider disabled as well.
> + power-domain-names = "power",
> + "perf";
> +};
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709132013.4096850-1-shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 13:20 [PATCH v5 0/7] Add initial device trees for Nord platform Shawn Guo
2026-07-09 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord SoC series Shawn Guo
2026-07-09 13:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord GearVM variant Shawn Guo
2026-07-09 13:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document SA8797P Ride board Shawn Guo
2026-07-09 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for " Shawn Guo
2026-07-09 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord Embedded variant Shawn Guo
2026-07-09 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document Nord IQ10 RRD board Shawn Guo
2026-07-10 7:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-10 7:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-09 13:20 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for " Shawn Guo
2026-07-09 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709135120.7C1D81F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox