* Re: [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" [not found] <202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com> @ 2025-05-16 20:10 ` Heiko Stübner 2025-05-18 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Heiko Stübner @ 2025-05-16 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Finley Xiao, kernel test robot, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-rockchip Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Kever Yang Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2025, 16:04:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb kernel test robot: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > head: bdd609656ff5573db9ba1d26496a528bdd297cf2 > commit: ceb6ef1ea9002669afc0e1ef258e530d3c05d91a [9473/11093] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3562 evb2 devicetree > config: arm64-randconfig-2052-20250513 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8) > dtschema version: 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/ > > dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:1115.20-1181.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pinctrl: missing or empty reg/ranges property hmm, I don't really understand this error message. From a practical point, the dtschema-version I have installed is 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3, which is the topmost commit from may-13th. Running the dtbscheck on the rk3562-evb-v10.dtb on the full linux-next from today, yields no errors. Checking out the specific commit ceb6ef1ea90026 brings up the errors from below [1], because they come from different trees. But in no cases does dtbscheck complain about the PCI memory regions. The PCIe controller in question of course has 3 memory regions reg = <0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x400000>, <0x0 0xff500000 0x0 0x10000>, <0x0 0xfc000000 0x0 0x100000>; reg-names = "dbi", "apb", "config"; and currently the node-name mimics the "apb" memory region. Should it always use the first one? [1] > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562-evb2-v10.dtb: /soc/power-management@ff258000/power-controller: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3562-power-controller'] > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562-evb2-v10.dtb: pcie@ff500000 (rockchip,rk3562-pcie): interrupt-names:5: 'dma0' was expected > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml# > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562-evb2-v10.dtb: pcie@ff500000 (rockchip,rk3562-pcie): compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > ['rockchip,rk3562-pcie', 'rockchip,rk3568-pcie'] is too long > 'rockchip,rk3568-pcie' was expected > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" 2025-05-16 20:10 ` [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" Heiko Stübner @ 2025-05-18 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2025-05-18 13:57 ` Heiko Stübner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-05-18 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiko Stübner, Finley Xiao, kernel test robot, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-rockchip Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Kever Yang On 16/05/2025 22:10, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2025, 16:04:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb kernel test robot: >> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master >> head: bdd609656ff5573db9ba1d26496a528bdd297cf2 >> commit: ceb6ef1ea9002669afc0e1ef258e530d3c05d91a [9473/11093] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3562 evb2 devicetree >> config: arm64-randconfig-2052-20250513 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/config) >> compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8) >> dtschema version: 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3 >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) >> >> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of >> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags >> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/ >> >> dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:1115.20-1181.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pinctrl: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > hmm, I don't really understand this error message. > > From a practical point, the dtschema-version I have installed is > 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3, which is the topmost commit from > may-13th. > > Running the dtbscheck on the rk3562-evb-v10.dtb on the full > linux-next from today, yields no errors. These are standard dtc warnings. > > Checking out the specific commit ceb6ef1ea90026 brings up the > errors from below [1], because they come from different trees. > > > But in no cases does dtbscheck complain about the PCI memory regions. > > > The PCIe controller in question of course has 3 memory regions > reg = <0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x400000>, > <0x0 0xff500000 0x0 0x10000>, > <0x0 0xfc000000 0x0 0x100000>; > reg-names = "dbi", "apb", "config"; > > and currently the node-name mimics the "apb" memory region. > Should it always use the first one? I don't understand where is the problem. The warning tells you: unit address is not correct. Fix the unit address to match reg. About second warning: that's also kind of already existing issue and fixed in multiple places. Don't put non-MMIO nodes in simple-bus, like soc, because it is not correct. simple-bus is for MMIO nodes. Best regards, Krzysztof ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" 2025-05-18 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-05-18 13:57 ` Heiko Stübner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Heiko Stübner @ 2025-05-18 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Finley Xiao, kernel test robot, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-rockchip, Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Kever Yang Am Sonntag, 18. Mai 2025, 12:36:50 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 16/05/2025 22:10, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2025, 16:04:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb kernel test robot: > >> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > >> head: bdd609656ff5573db9ba1d26496a528bdd297cf2 > >> commit: ceb6ef1ea9002669afc0e1ef258e530d3c05d91a [9473/11093] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3562 evb2 devicetree > >> config: arm64-randconfig-2052-20250513 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/config) > >> compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8) > >> dtschema version: 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3 > >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > >> > >> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > >> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > >> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > >> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/ > >> > >> dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" > >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:1115.20-1181.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pinctrl: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > > > hmm, I don't really understand this error message. > > > > From a practical point, the dtschema-version I have installed is > > 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3, which is the topmost commit from > > may-13th. > > > > Running the dtbscheck on the rk3562-evb-v10.dtb on the full > > linux-next from today, yields no errors. > > These are standard dtc warnings. > > > > > Checking out the specific commit ceb6ef1ea90026 brings up the > > errors from below [1], because they come from different trees. > > > > > > But in no cases does dtbscheck complain about the PCI memory regions. > > > > > > The PCIe controller in question of course has 3 memory regions > > reg = <0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x400000>, > > <0x0 0xff500000 0x0 0x10000>, > > <0x0 0xfc000000 0x0 0x100000>; > > reg-names = "dbi", "apb", "config"; > > > > and currently the node-name mimics the "apb" memory region. > > Should it always use the first one? > > I don't understand where is the problem. The warning tells you: unit > address is not correct. Fix the unit address to match reg. The problem was more on "is my toolchain outdated or why am I not seeing these reports". Which I now managed to resolve, because I finally saw the "(this is a W=1 build)" in the header of the reporting mail ;-) So yes, with the dtschema warning about the power-controller I got my mind stuck in the "is my dtschema" outdated, not realizing that the first one comes from dtc itself and then also missing the "(this is a W=1 build)" mention. Heiko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-18 13:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com>
2025-05-16 20:10 ` [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" Heiko Stübner
2025-05-18 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-05-18 13:57 ` Heiko Stübner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox