Re: [PATCH add immr alias 2/4] powerpc: 5121: Add immr alias to MPC5121 ADS device tree.

Re: [PATCH add immr alias 2/4] powerpc: 5121: Add immr alias to MPC5121 ADS device tree.

[Grant Likely]

Oops, forgot to add devicetree-discuss to the cc: list

g.

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:13 PM, John Rigby <jrigby@freescale.com> wrote:
>> So get_immrbase can function without a device_type = "soc"
>> property in the soc node.
>>
>> The "soc" node should really be named "immr"
>> because it does not include the entire soc, however
>> u-boot currently looks up this node by name for
>> a clock fixup so leave it "soc" for now.  We will change
>> it later after 5121 u-boot uses the immr alias instead
>> of the node name.
>
> Is it not sufficient to search the tree for a node with the
> <chip>-immr compatible value?  I don't think this is the intended use
> case of aliases.
>
> g.
>
> --
> Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
> Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.

Re: [PATCH add immr alias 1/4] powerpc: Teach get_immrbase to use immr alias if it exists.

[Grant Likely]

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 05 August 2008, John Rigby wrote:
>>>
>>> This will allow the eventual removal of device_type = "soc"
>>> properties in soc nodes.
>>
>> Stupid question, but why not remove immrbase instead?
>>
>> It seems that all users can be converted to use a reg
>> property of some actual device instead of making assumptions
>> about the register layout of the whole SOC.
>
> That wouldn't eliminate the need for the alias, though -- u-boot needs to
> find the node to fill in properties.

(already made this comment on one of the later patches, but it is more
relevant here...)

I don't think that using aliases is the best solution.  I'd rather see
U-Boot search for the appropriate compatible value for the IMMR node.

g.

>
> -Scott
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.

Re: [PATCH add immr alias 2/4] powerpc: 5121: Add immr alias to MPC5121 ADS device tree.

[John Rigby]

Uncle!

U-boot:

    The 5121 currently fixes up the soc's bus-frequency node with a hard
    coded path.
    I'll leave it that way.

Kernel:

    I would like to use mpc83xx_add_bridge for 5121.  This is why I
    moved it to fsl_pci.c.  It currently uses get_immrbase and adds
    0x8300 and 0x8304 to it to pass to setup_indirect_pci as the
    cfg_addr, and cfg_data addresses.

    I'm more than willing to change mpc83xx_add_bridge to not use
    get_immrbase.  One simple solution is to pass the cfg_addr and
    cfg_data addresses in.  If that seems ok then thats what I will do.

John






Grant Likely wrote:
> Oops, forgot to add devicetree-discuss to the cc: list
>
> g.
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>   
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:13 PM, John Rigby <jrigby@freescale.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> So get_immrbase can function without a device_type = "soc"
>>> property in the soc node.
>>>
>>> The "soc" node should really be named "immr"
>>> because it does not include the entire soc, however
>>> u-boot currently looks up this node by name for
>>> a clock fixup so leave it "soc" for now.  We will change
>>> it later after 5121 u-boot uses the immr alias instead
>>> of the node name.
>>>       
>> Is it not sufficient to search the tree for a node with the
>> <chip>-immr compatible value?  I don't think this is the intended use
>> case of aliases.
>>
>> g.
>>
>> --
>> Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
>> Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

Re: [PATCH add immr alias 2/4] powerpc: 5121: Add immr alias to MPC5121 ADS device tree.

[Scott Wood]

John Rigby wrote:
>    I would like to use mpc83xx_add_bridge for 5121.  This is why I
>    moved it to fsl_pci.c.  It currently uses get_immrbase and adds
>    0x8300 and 0x8304 to it to pass to setup_indirect_pci as the
>    cfg_addr, and cfg_data addresses.
> 
>    I'm more than willing to change mpc83xx_add_bridge to not use
>    get_immrbase.  One simple solution is to pass the cfg_addr and
>    cfg_data addresses in.  If that seems ok then thats what I will do.

We should really be putting those addresses in the "reg" property of the 
PCI node.

-Scott

Re: [PATCH add immr alias 2/4] powerpc: 5121: Add immr alias to MPC5121 ADS device tree.

[John Rigby]

Scott Wood wrote:
> John Rigby wrote:
>>    I would like to use mpc83xx_add_bridge for 5121.  This is why I
>>    moved it to fsl_pci.c.  It currently uses get_immrbase and adds
>>    0x8300 and 0x8304 to it to pass to setup_indirect_pci as the
>>    cfg_addr, and cfg_data addresses.
>>
>>    I'm more than willing to change mpc83xx_add_bridge to not use
>>    get_immrbase.  One simple solution is to pass the cfg_addr and
>>    cfg_data addresses in.  If that seems ok then thats what I will do.
>
> We should really be putting those addresses in the "reg" property of 
> the PCI node.
>
> -Scott
>
Yes, which is what fsl_add_bridge does it.