* [PATCH] Documentation: Fix duplicate statement about raw_spinlock_t type
@ 2022-03-21 14:41 Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-03-25 19:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guilherme G. Piccoli @ 2022-03-21 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-doc; +Cc: corbet, linux-kernel, gpiccoli, kernel, Thomas Gleixner
Unless it was duplicate on purpose, to emphasize that a raw_spinlock_t
is always a spinning lock regardless of PREEMPT_RT or kernel config,
it's a bit odd that this text is duplicate. So, this patch just clean
it up, keeping the consistency with the other sections of the text.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 919e9e6395cf ("Documentation: Add lock ordering and nesting documentation")
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
---
Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
index bfa75ea1b66a..9933faad4771 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
@@ -211,9 +211,6 @@ raw_spinlock_t and spinlock_t
raw_spinlock_t
--------------
-raw_spinlock_t is a strict spinning lock implementation regardless of the
-kernel configuration including PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels.
-
raw_spinlock_t is a strict spinning lock implementation in all kernels,
including PREEMPT_RT kernels. Use raw_spinlock_t only in real critical
core code, low-level interrupt handling and places where disabling
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fix duplicate statement about raw_spinlock_t type
2022-03-21 14:41 [PATCH] Documentation: Fix duplicate statement about raw_spinlock_t type Guilherme G. Piccoli
@ 2022-03-25 19:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-03-25 19:38 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2022-03-25 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guilherme G. Piccoli, linux-doc
Cc: linux-kernel, gpiccoli, kernel, Thomas Gleixner
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com> writes:
> Unless it was duplicate on purpose, to emphasize that a raw_spinlock_t
> is always a spinning lock regardless of PREEMPT_RT or kernel config,
> it's a bit odd that this text is duplicate. So, this patch just clean
> it up, keeping the consistency with the other sections of the text.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Fixes: 919e9e6395cf ("Documentation: Add lock ordering and nesting documentation")
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
> ---
> Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
> index bfa75ea1b66a..9933faad4771 100644
> --- a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
> @@ -211,9 +211,6 @@ raw_spinlock_t and spinlock_t
> raw_spinlock_t
> --------------
>
> -raw_spinlock_t is a strict spinning lock implementation regardless of the
> -kernel configuration including PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels.
> -
> raw_spinlock_t is a strict spinning lock implementation in all kernels,
> including PREEMPT_RT kernels. Use raw_spinlock_t only in real critical
> core code, low-level interrupt handling and places where disabling
I don't think that was intentional. Applied, thanks.
For future reference, a far better changelog would have been something
like:
Remove the duplicated sentence from locktypes.rst
Thanks,
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fix duplicate statement about raw_spinlock_t type
2022-03-25 19:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
@ 2022-03-25 19:38 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guilherme G. Piccoli @ 2022-03-25 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel, Thomas Gleixner
On 25/03/2022 16:32, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com> writes:
> [...]
> For future reference, a far better changelog would have been something
> like:
>
> Remove the duplicated sentence from locktypes.rst
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
Thanks Jon, and feel free to change that when applying in case you
prefer, it's a good choice of words, better than mine.
Cheers,
Guilherme
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-25 19:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-21 14:41 [PATCH] Documentation: Fix duplicate statement about raw_spinlock_t type Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-03-25 19:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-03-25 19:38 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox