Linux EDAC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4] EDAC/altera: use ECC manager compatible to select A10/S10 IRQ layout
@ 2026-06-27  6:17 Rounak Das
  2026-07-01 22:07 ` Dinh Nguyen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rounak Das @ 2026-06-27  6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dinguyen; +Cc: bp, tony.luck, linux-edac, linux-kernel, Rounak Das

The SDMMC ECC IRQ layout selection uses CONFIG_64BIT to distinguish
between Arria10 and Stratix10 paths.

Detect the SoC once at probe via the device match table (.data),
store it in struct altr_arria10_edac, and use it instead of CONFIG_64BIT.

This keeps the decision correct for every ECC child device
(OCRAM, SD/MMC, etc.) and avoids any runtime compatible lookup.

Signed-off-by: Rounak Das <rounakdas2025@gmail.com>
---
v4:
 - Carry the A10/S10 distinction in the device match table .data and read
   it with device_get_match_data(), instead of of_device_is_compatible()
   at runtime (Dinh).

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260617000711.60804-1-rounakdas2025@gmail.com/
 - Use altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager and store it once as is_s10 (Dinh).
 - Fix checkpatch alignment.

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac/20260616081709.48774-1-rounakdas2025@gmail.com/
 - Use legal name in Signed-off-by (Borislav).

 drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/edac/altera_edac.h |   1 +
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
index 4edd2088c2db6..24bdf7f5bac63 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
@@ -1507,6 +1507,7 @@ static int altr_portb_setup(struct altr_edac_device_dev *device)
 	int edac_idx, rc;
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct edac_device_prv_data *prv = &a10_sdmmceccb_data;
+	bool is_s10 = device->edac->is_s10;
 
 	rc = altr_check_ecc_deps(device);
 	if (rc)
@@ -1548,15 +1549,14 @@ static int altr_portb_setup(struct altr_edac_device_dev *device)
 
 	/*
 	 * Update the PortB IRQs - A10 has 4, S10 has 2, Index accordingly
-	 *
-	 * FIXME: Instead of ifdefs with different architectures the driver
-	 *        should properly use compatibles.
 	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
-	altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
-#else
-	altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 2);
-#endif
+
+	/* Using compatibles to determine the IRQ Index */
+	if (is_s10)
+		altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
+	else
+		altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 2);
+
 	if (!altdev->sb_irq) {
 		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB SBIRQ alloc\n");
 		rc = -ENODEV;
@@ -1570,29 +1570,28 @@ static int altr_portb_setup(struct altr_edac_device_dev *device)
 		goto err_release_group_1;
 	}
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
-	/* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
-	rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 1, &altdev->db_irq);
-	if (rc) {
-		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
-			    "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
-		goto err_release_group_1;
-	}
-#else
-	altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 3);
-	if (!altdev->db_irq) {
-		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
-		rc = -ENODEV;
-		goto err_release_group_1;
-	}
-	rc = devm_request_irq(&altdev->ddev, altdev->db_irq,
-			      prv->ecc_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
-			      ecc_name, altdev);
-	if (rc) {
-		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "PortB DBERR IRQ error\n");
-		goto err_release_group_1;
+	if (is_s10) {
+		/* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
+		rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 1, &altdev->db_irq);
+		if (rc) {
+			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
+			goto err_release_group_1;
+		}
+	} else {
+		altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 3);
+		if (!altdev->db_irq) {
+			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
+			rc = -ENODEV;
+			goto err_release_group_1;
+		}
+		rc = devm_request_irq(&altdev->ddev, altdev->db_irq,
+				      prv->ecc_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
+				      ecc_name, altdev);
+		if (rc) {
+			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "PortB DBERR IRQ error\n");
+			goto err_release_group_1;
+		}
 	}
-#endif
 
 	rc = edac_device_add_device(dci);
 	if (rc) {
@@ -1974,29 +1973,29 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_device_add(struct altr_arria10_edac *edac,
 		goto err_release_group1;
 	}
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
-	/* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
-	rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 0, &altdev->db_irq);
-	if (rc) {
-		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
-			    "Unable to parse DB IRQ index\n");
-		goto err_release_group1;
-	}
-#else
-	altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
-	if (!altdev->db_irq) {
-		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error allocating DBIRQ\n");
-		rc = -ENODEV;
-		goto err_release_group1;
-	}
-	rc = devm_request_irq(edac->dev, altdev->db_irq, prv->ecc_irq_handler,
-			      IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
-			      ecc_name, altdev);
-	if (rc) {
-		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "No DBERR IRQ resource\n");
-		goto err_release_group1;
+	if (edac->is_s10) {
+		/* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
+		rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 0, &altdev->db_irq);
+		if (rc) {
+			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
+				    "Unable to parse DB IRQ index\n");
+			goto err_release_group1;
+		}
+	} else {
+		altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
+		if (!altdev->db_irq) {
+			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error allocating DBIRQ\n");
+			rc = -ENODEV;
+			goto err_release_group1;
+		}
+		rc = devm_request_irq(edac->dev, altdev->db_irq, prv->ecc_irq_handler,
+				      IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
+				      ecc_name, altdev);
+		if (rc) {
+			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "No DBERR IRQ resource\n");
+			goto err_release_group1;
+		}
 	}
-#endif
 
 	rc = edac_device_add_device(dci);
 	if (rc) {
@@ -2122,6 +2121,8 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, edac);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&edac->a10_ecc_devices);
 
+	edac->is_s10 = !!device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+
 	edac->ecc_mgr_map =
 		altr_sysmgr_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
 						     "altr,sysmgr-syscon");
@@ -2207,7 +2208,7 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static const struct of_device_id altr_edac_a10_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "altr,socfpga-a10-ecc-manager" },
-	{ .compatible = "altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager" },
+	{ .compatible = "altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager", .data = (void *)1 },
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, altr_edac_a10_of_match);
diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.h b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.h
index f3e84172caa9c..9387056fd65e3 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.h
@@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ struct altr_arria10_edac {
 	struct irq_chip		irq_chip;
 	struct list_head	a10_ecc_devices;
 	struct notifier_block	panic_notifier;
+	bool is_s10;
 };
 
 #endif	/* #ifndef _ALTERA_EDAC_H */
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] EDAC/altera: use ECC manager compatible to select A10/S10 IRQ layout
  2026-06-27  6:17 [PATCH v4] EDAC/altera: use ECC manager compatible to select A10/S10 IRQ layout Rounak Das
@ 2026-07-01 22:07 ` Dinh Nguyen
  2026-07-02 15:53   ` Rounak Das
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dinh Nguyen @ 2026-07-01 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rounak Das; +Cc: bp, tony.luck, linux-edac, linux-kernel

Hi Rounak,

On 6/27/26 01:17, Rounak Das wrote:
> The SDMMC ECC IRQ layout selection uses CONFIG_64BIT to distinguish
> between Arria10 and Stratix10 paths.
> 
> Detect the SoC once at probe via the device match table (.data),
> store it in struct altr_arria10_edac, and use it instead of CONFIG_64BIT.
> 
> This keeps the decision correct for every ECC child device
> (OCRAM, SD/MMC, etc.) and avoids any runtime compatible lookup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rounak Das <rounakdas2025@gmail.com>
> ---
> v4:
>   - Carry the A10/S10 distinction in the device match table .data and read
>     it with device_get_match_data(), instead of of_device_is_compatible()
>     at runtime (Dinh).
> 

I tested on both 32-bit and 64-bit platforms and it looks good. However, 
did you want to go ahead and removed the 2 remaining CONFIG_64BIT ifdefs?

DInh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] EDAC/altera: use ECC manager compatible to select A10/S10 IRQ layout
  2026-07-01 22:07 ` Dinh Nguyen
@ 2026-07-02 15:53   ` Rounak Das
  2026-07-06 12:34     ` Dinh Nguyen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rounak Das @ 2026-07-02 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dinh Nguyen; +Cc: bp, tony.luck, linux-edac, linux-kernel

Hi Dinh,

Thank you. I am glad that v4 tested clean on both platforms.

On the two remaining ifdefs: I originally left them as-is because they
guard the double-bit-error path, where the SError handling and
arm_smccc_smc() reboot are arm64-specific. Converting to is_s10 would
compile s10_edac_dberr_handler() on 32-bit too, but that looks fine
since the symbols it needs (arm_smccc_smc, INTEL_SIP_SMC_ECC_DBE, the
S10 sysmgr defines) are all available on 32-bit socfpga.

I'd like your opinion before sending it. If you'd like them removed,
I'll do it as a separate commit, patch 2/2 in a v5 series, since the
DB-error path is a distinct change from the IRQ-index selection.

Thanks,
Rounak

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] EDAC/altera: use ECC manager compatible to select A10/S10 IRQ layout
  2026-07-02 15:53   ` Rounak Das
@ 2026-07-06 12:34     ` Dinh Nguyen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dinh Nguyen @ 2026-07-06 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rounak Das; +Cc: bp, tony.luck, linux-edac, linux-kernel



On 7/2/26 10:53, Rounak Das wrote:
> Hi Dinh,
> 
> Thank you. I am glad that v4 tested clean on both platforms.
> 
> On the two remaining ifdefs: I originally left them as-is because they
> guard the double-bit-error path, where the SError handling and
> arm_smccc_smc() reboot are arm64-specific. Converting to is_s10 would
> compile s10_edac_dberr_handler() on 32-bit too, but that looks fine
> since the symbols it needs (arm_smccc_smc, INTEL_SIP_SMC_ECC_DBE, the
> S10 sysmgr defines) are all available on 32-bit socfpga.
> 
> I'd like your opinion before sending it. If you'd like them removed,
> I'll do it as a separate commit, patch 2/2 in a v5 series, since the
> DB-error path is a distinct change from the IRQ-index selection.
> 

That sounds good. I actually tested with all the ifdefs removed and it 
looks fine.

Thanks,
Dinh


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-06 12:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-27  6:17 [PATCH v4] EDAC/altera: use ECC manager compatible to select A10/S10 IRQ layout Rounak Das
2026-07-01 22:07 ` Dinh Nguyen
2026-07-02 15:53   ` Rounak Das
2026-07-06 12:34     ` Dinh Nguyen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox