From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
sct@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:46:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060911094641.GA3336@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45017FAA.1070203@us.ibm.com>
Hi,
> >>>Original commit code assumes, that when a buffer on BJ_SyncData list is
> >>>locked,
> >>>it is being written to disk. But this is not true and hence it can lead
> >>>to a
> >>>potential data loss on crash. Also the code didn't count with the fact
> >>>that
> >>>journal_dirty_data() can steal buffers from committing transaction and
> >>>hence
> >>>could write buffers that no longer belong to the committing transaction.
> >>>Finally it could possibly happen that we tried writing out one buffer
> >>>several
> >>>times.
> >>>
> >>>The patch below tries to solve these problems by a complete rewrite of
> >>>the data
> >>>commit code. We go through buffers on t_sync_datalist, lock buffers
> >>>needing
> >>>write out and store them in an array. Buffers are also immediately
> >>>refiled to
> >>>BJ_Locked list or unfiled (if the write out is completed). When the
> >>>array is
> >>>full or we have to block on buffer lock, we submit all accumulated
> >>>buffers for
> >>>IO.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I have been running 4+ hours with this patch and seems to work fine. I
> >>haven't hit any
> >>assert yet :)
> >>
> >>I will let it run till tomorrow. I will let you know, how it goes.
> >>
> > Great, thanks. BTW: Do you have any performance tests handy? The
> >changes are big enough to cause some unexpected performance regressions,
> >livelocks... If you don't have anything ready, I can setup and run
> >something myself. Just that I don't like this testing too much ;).
> >
> Tests are still running fine.
>
> I don't have any performance tests handy. We have some automated tests I
> can schedule to run to verify the stability aspects.
OK. I've run IOZONE rewrite throughput test on my computer with
iozone -t 10 -i 0 -s 10M -e
2.6.18-rc6 and the same kernel + my patch seem to give almost the same
results. The strange thing was that both in vanilla and patched kernel there
were several runs where a write througput (when iozone was creating the file)
was suddenly 10% of the usual value (18MB/s vs. 2MB/s). The rewrite numbers
were always fine. Maybe that has something to do with block allocation
code. Anyway, it is not a regression of my patch so unless your test
finds some problem I think the patch should be ready for inclusion into
-mm...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-11 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-01 15:50 [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-01 16:12 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-09-01 16:32 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-01 17:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-01 17:43 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-01 21:01 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-05 16:11 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-06 12:47 ` Jan Kara
2006-09-06 15:12 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-06 15:34 ` Jan Kara
2006-09-06 16:19 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-06 16:27 ` Jan Kara
2006-09-06 16:43 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-06 17:03 ` Jan Kara
2006-09-06 17:16 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-06 17:27 ` Jan Kara
2006-09-07 2:14 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-07 3:04 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-07 3:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-07 15:11 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-07 20:48 ` Jan Kara
2006-09-07 22:30 ` Jan Kara
2006-09-08 4:33 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-08 8:25 ` Jan Kara
2006-09-08 14:35 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-11 9:46 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2006-09-11 20:45 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-09-11 20:52 ` Jan Kara
2006-09-13 20:25 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-09-14 3:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-27 22:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-09-28 15:03 ` [PATCH] JBD: Make journal_do_submit_data static Dave Kleikamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060911094641.GA3336@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox