public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, sct@redhat.com, adilger@sun.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	jack@suse.cz, sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com>,
	Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ext3: don't read inode block if the buffer has a write error
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:31:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080623123116.GL26743@duck.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806232146.28379.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>

On Mon 23-06-08 21:46:27, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Monday 23 June 2008 21:25, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> > A transient I/O error can corrupt inode data.  Here is the scenario:
> >
> > (1) update inode_A at the block_B
> > (2) pdflush writes out new inode_A to the filesystem, but it results
> >     in write I/O error, at this point, BH_Uptodate flag of the buffer
> >     for block_B is cleared and BH_Write_EIO is set
> > (3) create new inode_C which located at block_B, and
> >     __ext3_get_inode_loc() tries to read on-disk block_B because the
> >     buffer is not uptodate
> > (4) if it can read on-disk block_B successfully, inode_A is
> >     overwritten by old data
> >
> > This patch makes __ext3_get_inode_loc() not read the inode block if
> > the buffer has BH_Write_EIO flag.  In this case, the buffer should
> > have the latest information, so setting the uptodate flag to the
> > buffer (this avoids WARN_ON_ONCE() in mark_buffer_dirty().)
> >
> > According to this change, we would need to test BH_Write_EIO flag for
> > the error checking.  Currently nobody checks write I/O errors on
> > metadata buffers, but it will be done in other patches I'm working on.
> 
> IMO there is a problem with all the buffer head and pagecache error
> handling in that uptodate gets cleared on write errors. This is not
> only wrong (because the in-memory copy continues to contain the most
> uptodate copy), but it will trigger assertions all over the mm and
> buffer code AFAIKS.
> 
> I don't know why it was done like this, or if anybody actually tested
> any of it, but AFAIKS the best way to fix this is to simply not
> clear any uptodate bits upon write errors.
  That would be non-trivial effort because there are lots of places which
do things like:
  wait_on_buffer(bh);
  if (!buffer_uptodate)
    /* IO error handling */

  But what you say sounds like a reasonable thing from a logical
perspective.

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-23 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-23 11:25 [RFC][PATCH] ext3: don't read inode block if the buffer has a write error Hidehiro Kawai
2008-06-23 11:46 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-23 12:31   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2008-06-23 12:36     ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24  2:17   ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-24  3:01     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-24  3:17       ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24  3:42         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-24 13:03           ` Hidehiro Kawai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080623123116.GL26743@duck.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox