From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sct@redhat.com, adilger@sun.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz, sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] ext3: don't read inode block if the buffer has a write error
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:25:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485F8822.5030205@hitachi.com> (raw)
A transient I/O error can corrupt inode data. Here is the scenario:
(1) update inode_A at the block_B
(2) pdflush writes out new inode_A to the filesystem, but it results
in write I/O error, at this point, BH_Uptodate flag of the buffer
for block_B is cleared and BH_Write_EIO is set
(3) create new inode_C which located at block_B, and
__ext3_get_inode_loc() tries to read on-disk block_B because the
buffer is not uptodate
(4) if it can read on-disk block_B successfully, inode_A is
overwritten by old data
This patch makes __ext3_get_inode_loc() not read the inode block if
the buffer has BH_Write_EIO flag. In this case, the buffer should
have the latest information, so setting the uptodate flag to the
buffer (this avoids WARN_ON_ONCE() in mark_buffer_dirty().)
According to this change, we would need to test BH_Write_EIO flag for
the error checking. Currently nobody checks write I/O errors on
metadata buffers, but it will be done in other patches I'm working on.
Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
---
fs/ext3/inode.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/fs/ext3/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -2516,6 +2516,16 @@ static int __ext3_get_inode_loc(struct i
}
if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
lock_buffer(bh);
+
+ /*
+ * If the buffer has the write error flag, we have failed
+ * to write out another inode in the same block. In this
+ * case, we don't have to read the block because we may
+ * read the old inode data successfully.
+ */
+ if (buffer_write_io_error(bh) && !buffer_uptodate(bh))
+ set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+
if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
/* someone brought it uptodate while we waited */
unlock_buffer(bh);
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-23 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-23 11:25 Hidehiro Kawai [this message]
2008-06-23 11:46 ` [RFC][PATCH] ext3: don't read inode block if the buffer has a write error Nick Piggin
2008-06-23 12:31 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-23 12:36 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 2:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-24 3:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-24 3:17 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 3:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-24 13:03 ` Hidehiro Kawai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485F8822.5030205@hitachi.com \
--to=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox