From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
sct@redhat.com, adilger@sun.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ext3: don't read inode block if the buffer has a write error
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:03:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4860F0BC.1090404@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806232039300.2926@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Hi all,
Thank you for precious comments.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>What you want to do is not insane, but the way it is currently being
>>done is. As I said, just clearing the uptodate bit might blow up your
>>kernel pretty quickly from assertions in the vm. It should be going
>>through the whole truncate or invalidate page machinery in order to
>>do that.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> I would not mind, for example, leaving the uptodate bit, but removing it
> from the radix tree or something like that (ie turning it into an
> anonymous page for a page-cache page, just removing it from the
> hash-queues for a buffer_head).
If we move page caches with errors to another radix tree instead of
just removing, we may be able to do special handlings: rewrite once,
or check the page caches and get rid of them from user space, and so on.
> Of course, that could cause other problems (eg any VM assertions that
> shared mappings only contain non-anon pages).
As Jan and Nick stated, this seems to need a great effort, but I think
it is worthwhile to do.
Thanks,
--
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Systems Development Laboratory
Linux Technology Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-23 11:25 [RFC][PATCH] ext3: don't read inode block if the buffer has a write error Hidehiro Kawai
2008-06-23 11:46 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-23 12:31 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-23 12:36 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 2:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-24 3:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-24 3:17 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-24 3:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-24 13:03 ` Hidehiro Kawai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4860F0BC.1090404@hitachi.com \
--to=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox