* KDE EchoLinux client project
@ 2003-04-07 21:52 Michael Melanson
2003-04-08 11:21 ` John
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Melanson @ 2003-04-07 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LINUX HAMS MAILING LIST
Hi everyone
In light of the fact that there is no good GUI client for EchoLinux, the Linux
implementation of the EchoLink protocol, I am starting development of a
KDE/Qt-based client. SourceForge just set up the project. Anyone with
experience developing with KDE and who can afford a modest time committment
(I don't ask much) should email me (ve3mtm@rac.ca).
The end result will be licenced under the GPL so that all may use and modify
it. The development will be very open: no genuine help will be turned down
Thanks in advance for any help
Michael VE3MTM
ve3mtm@rac.ca
73 33
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KDE EchoLinux client project
2003-04-07 21:52 KDE EchoLinux client project Michael Melanson
@ 2003-04-08 11:21 ` John
2003-04-08 12:25 ` w9ya
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: John @ 2003-04-08 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ve3mtm; +Cc: linux-hams
On 7 Apr, Michael Melanson wrote:
..
> In light of the fact that there is no good GUI client for EchoLinux, the Linux
> implementation of the EchoLink protocol, I am starting development of a
> KDE/Qt-based client. SourceForge just set up the project. Anyone with
> experience developing with KDE and who can afford a modest time committment
> (I don't ask much) should email me (ve3mtm@rac.ca).
Why not make use of GTK+ rather than KDE/Qt, then your package isn't
locking us all into installing KDE...
John
--
John Heaton, G1YYH
Manchester Computing, Kilburn Building.
The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, England, M13-9PL
pstn://+44-161-275-6011/Hello/Is.Dat-U?
fax://+44-161-275-6040/screech/warble/ssshhh/beepbeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KDE EchoLinux client project
2003-04-08 11:21 ` John
@ 2003-04-08 12:25 ` w9ya
2003-04-08 13:39 ` Hamish Moffatt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: w9ya @ 2003-04-08 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
Actually a qt based one should be just as satisfactory. Most desktop machines
have both gtk and qt installed to take advantage of programs written for
both.
Bob
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 06:21 am, John@man.ac.uk wrote:
> On 7 Apr, Michael Melanson wrote:
> ..
>
> > In light of the fact that there is no good GUI client for EchoLinux, the
> > Linux implementation of the EchoLink protocol, I am starting development
> > of a KDE/Qt-based client. SourceForge just set up the project. Anyone
> > with experience developing with KDE and who can afford a modest time
> > committment (I don't ask much) should email me (ve3mtm@rac.ca).
>
> Why not make use of GTK+ rather than KDE/Qt, then your package isn't
> locking us all into installing KDE...
>
> John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KDE EchoLinux client project
2003-04-08 12:25 ` w9ya
@ 2003-04-08 13:39 ` Hamish Moffatt
2003-04-08 14:20 ` Tim Neu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hamish Moffatt @ 2003-04-08 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 07:25:16AM -0500, w9ya wrote:
> Actually a qt based one should be just as satisfactory. Most desktop machines
> have both gtk and qt installed to take advantage of programs written for
> both.
I'd say non-GNOME GTK+ programs are far more common than non-KDE Qt
programs.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KDE EchoLinux client project
2003-04-08 13:39 ` Hamish Moffatt
@ 2003-04-08 14:20 ` Tim Neu
2003-04-08 15:26 ` John
2003-04-08 15:52 ` Margaret Leber
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tim Neu @ 2003-04-08 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 11:39:05PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 07:25:16AM -0500, w9ya wrote:
> > Actually a qt based one should be just as satisfactory. Most desktop machines
> > have both gtk and qt installed to take advantage of programs written for
> > both.
>
> I'd say non-GNOME GTK+ programs are far more common than non-KDE Qt
> programs.
I'd say most of us Linux folks would just be happy with something that
works!
In any event, it is too soon to argue! :-)
Once you have basic functionality, then the KDE folks can make their QT
version and the Gnome folks can make their GTK version.
Is the source code (or specifications) for Echolink available?
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
______ _ __ Military Intelligence
/ ' ) ) -KC0LQL- Honest Politician
/ o ______ / / _ . . Intellectual Property
/ <_/ / / < / (_</_(_/_ -- tneu@visi.com / http://www.visi.com/~tneu --
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KDE EchoLinux client project
2003-04-08 14:20 ` Tim Neu
@ 2003-04-08 15:26 ` John
2003-04-08 15:52 ` Margaret Leber
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: John @ 2003-04-08 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tim; +Cc: linux-hams
On 8 Apr, Tim Neu wrote:
> I'd say most of us Linux folks would just be happy with something that
> works!
True!
> Once you have basic functionality, then the KDE folks can make their QT
> version and the Gnome folks can make their GTK version.
Gnome is built on GTK, and the two are not tied together as you imply,
as GTK based applications existed long before either Gnome or KDE. GTKis
a derivative of the GIMP software NOT Gnome.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KDE EchoLinux client project
2003-04-08 14:20 ` Tim Neu
2003-04-08 15:26 ` John
@ 2003-04-08 15:52 ` Margaret Leber
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Margaret Leber @ 2003-04-08 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tim Neu; +Cc: linux-hams
Tim Neu wrote:
> I'd say most of us Linux folks would just be happy with something that
> works!
Me too. I currently have EchoLinux (and EchoGUI, a sample client written
in Xforms) installed on my 2.4.3-12 Red Hat system. Everything seem so
work fine, except that I can't get any audio to transmit; receiveing
works fine. The microphone otherwise works correctly. Linux audio is
still a bit of a black art.
> Is the source code (or specifications) for Echolink available?
My understanding is that there's not a lot of additional protocol
layered on top of an H.323 core; the EchoLinux is built on the
SpeakFreely project.
73 de Maggie K3XS
--
-----/___. _) Margaret Stephanie Leber / "The art of progress /
----/(, /| /| http://voicenet.com/~maggie / consists of preserving/
---/ / | / | _ _ _ ` _AOPA 925383/ order amid change and /
--/ ) / |/ |_(_(_(_/_(_/__(__(/_ FN20hd / change amid order." /
-/ (_/ ' K3XS .-/ .-/ ARRL 39280 /___ --A.N.Whitehead ___/
/____ICQ 7161096_(_/_(_/__AMSAT 32844____/ <maggie@voicenet.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-08 15:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-07 21:52 KDE EchoLinux client project Michael Melanson
2003-04-08 11:21 ` John
2003-04-08 12:25 ` w9ya
2003-04-08 13:39 ` Hamish Moffatt
2003-04-08 14:20 ` Tim Neu
2003-04-08 15:26 ` John
2003-04-08 15:52 ` Margaret Leber
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox