From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: [PATCH 22/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for MAX6690
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 06:57:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220525135758.2944744-23-linux@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220525135758.2944744-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
MAX6690 is all but identical to MAX6654. Revision 1 of its
datasheet lists the same chip ID as MAX6654, and a chip labeled
MAX6654 was found to have the chip ID listed as MAX6690 chip ID
in Revision 2 of its datasheet.
A devicetree node is not added for this chip since it is quite unlikely
that such an old chip will ever be used in a devicetree based system.
It can be added later if needed.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
Documentation/hwmon/lm90.rst | 2 +-
drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/lm90.rst b/Documentation/hwmon/lm90.rst
index 53429f79b819..45bc333a1219 100644
--- a/Documentation/hwmon/lm90.rst
+++ b/Documentation/hwmon/lm90.rst
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ MAX6648, MAX6692:
* Better local resolution
* Unsigned temperature
-MAX6654:
+MAX6654, MAX6690:
* Better local resolution
* Selectable address
* Remote sensor type selection
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
index abc64738e892..22ea75535ab4 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@
* accordingly, and is done during initialization. Extended precision is only
* available at conversion rates of 1 Hz and slower. Note that extended
* precision is not enabled by default, as this driver initializes all chips
- * to 2 Hz by design.
+ * to 2 Hz by design. The driver also supports MAX6690, which is practically
+ * identical to MAX6654.
*
* This driver also supports the MAX6646, MAX6647, MAX6648, MAX6649 and
* MAX6692 chips made by Maxim. These are again similar to the LM86,
@@ -237,6 +238,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lm90_id[] = {
{ "max6659", max6659 },
{ "max6680", max6680 },
{ "max6681", max6680 },
+ { "max6690", max6654 },
{ "max6692", max6648 },
{ "max6695", max6696 },
{ "max6696", max6696 },
@@ -1716,6 +1718,19 @@ static const char *lm90_detect_maxim(struct i2c_client *client, int chip_id,
if (!(config1 & 0x07) && convrate <= 0x07)
name = "max6654";
break;
+ case 0x09:
+ /*
+ * The chip_id of the MAX6690 holds the revision of the chip.
+ * The lowest 3 bits of the config1 register are unused and
+ * should return zero when read.
+ * Note that MAX6654 and MAX6690 are practically the same chips.
+ * The only diference is the rated accuracy. Rev. 1 of the
+ * MAX6690 datasheet lists a chip ID of 0x08, and a chip labeled
+ * MAX6654 was observed to have a chip ID of 0x09.
+ */
+ if (!(config1 & 0x07) && convrate <= 0x07)
+ name = "max6690";
+ break;
case 0x4d:
/*
* The MAX6657, MAX6658 and MAX6659 do NOT have a chip_id
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-25 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-25 13:57 [PATCH 00/40] hwmon: (lm90) Various improvements to lm90 driver Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 01/40] hwmon: (lm90) Generate sysfs and udev events for all alarms Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 02/40] hwmon: (lm90) Rework alarm/status handling Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 03/40] hwmon: (lm90) Reorder include files in alphabetical order Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 04/40] hwmon: (lm90) Reorder chip enumeration to be " Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 05/40] hwmon: (lm90) Use BIT macro Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 06/40] hwmon: (lm90) Move status register bit shifts to compile time Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 07/40] hwmon: (lm90) Stop using R_/W_ register prefix Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 08/40] hwmon: (lm90) Improve PEC support Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 09/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add partial PEC support for ADT7461 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 10/40] hwmon: (lm90) Enable full PEC support for ADT7461A Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 11/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for unsigned and signed temperatures Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 12/40] hwmon: (lm90) Only re-read registers if volatile Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 13/40] hwmon: (lm90) Support multiple temperature resolutions Guenter Roeck
2022-05-26 7:12 ` Slawomir Stepien
2022-05-26 14:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 14/40] hwmon: (lm90) Use single flag to indicate extended temperature support Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 15/40] hwmon: (lm90) Rework detect function Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 16/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for additional chip revision of NCT1008 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 17/40] hwmon: (lm90) Fix/Add detection of G781-1 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 18/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add flag to indicate 'alarms' attribute support Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 19/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add explicit support for MAX6648/MAX6692 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 20/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for ADT7481, ADT7482, and ADT7483 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-27 5:08 ` Slawomir Stepien
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 21/40] hwmon: (lm90) Strengthen chip detection for ADM1032, ADT7461(A), and NCT1008 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 23/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add flag to indicate support for minimum temperature limits Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 24/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add flag to indicate conversion rate support Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 25/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for MAX6642 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 26/40] hwmon: (lm90) Let lm90_read16() handle 8-bit read operations Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 27/40] hwmon: (lm90) Introduce 16-bit register write function Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 28/40] hwmon: (lm90) Support MAX1617 and LM84 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 29/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for ADM1021, ADM1021A, and ADM1023 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 30/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add remaining chips supported by adm1021 driver Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 31/40] hwmon: (lm90) Combine lm86 and lm90 configuration Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 32/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add explicit support for NCT210 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 33/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for ON Semiconductor NCT214 and NCT72 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 34/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for ON Semiconductor NCT218 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 35/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for ADT7421 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 36/40] hwmon: (lm90) Only disable alerts if not already disabled Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 37/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add explicit support for ADM1020 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 38/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add support and detection of Philips/NXP NE1618 Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 39/40] hwmon: (lm90) Add table with supported Analog/ONSEMI devices Guenter Roeck
2022-05-25 13:57 ` [PATCH 40/40] hwmon: (lm90) Support temp_samples attribute Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220525135758.2944744-23-linux@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sst@poczta.fm \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox