Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: Cleanups around slow_down_io()

["Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 845 bytes --]

On 16.12.25 14:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Jürgen Groß <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
> 
>>> CPUs anymore. Should it cause any regressions, it's easy to bisect to.
>>> There's been enough changes around all these facilities that the
>>> original timings are probably way off already, so we've just been
>>> cargo-cult porting these to newer kernels essentially.
>>
>> Fine with me.
>>
>> Which path to removal of io_delay would you (and others) prefer?
>>
>> 1. Ripping it out immediately.
> 
> I'd just rip it out immediately, and see who complains. :-)

I figured this might be a little bit too evil. :-)

I've just sent V2 defaulting to have no delay, so anyone hit by that
can still fix it by applying the "io_delay" boot parameter.

I'll do the ripping out for kernel 6.21 (or whatever it will be called).


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]