From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@m17n.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-390@vm.marist.edu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:50:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041020105027.54bf9e89.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041020152957.GA21774@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Linus, Andrew,
> >
> > The attached patch adds syscalls for almost all archs (everything barring
> > m68knommu which is in a real mess, and i386 which already has it).
> >
> > It also adds 32->64 compatibility where appropriate.
>
> Umm, that patch added the damn multiplexer that had been vetoed multiple
> times. Why did this happen?
Fifteen new syscalls was judged excessive and the keyfs interface was
judged slow and bloaty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-20 14:44 [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs David Howells
2004-10-20 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 17:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-10-20 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 15:49 ` [parisc-linux] " Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-20 16:16 ` David Howells
2004-10-20 17:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-10-20 22:01 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-20 22:56 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 23:04 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 David S. Miller
2004-10-20 23:25 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 23:41 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 David S. Miller
2004-10-21 0:10 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Andi Kleen
2004-10-21 8:03 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-21 1:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-21 8:47 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041020105027.54bf9e89.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-390@vm.marist.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-sh@m17n.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox