public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	discuss@x86-64.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@m17n.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
	parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-390@vm.marist.edu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:29:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041020152957.GA21774@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3506.1098283455@redhat.com>

> Hi Linus, Andrew,
> 
> The attached patch adds syscalls for almost all archs (everything barring
> m68knommu which is in a real mess, and i386 which already has it).
> 
> It also adds 32->64 compatibility where appropriate.

Umm, that patch added the damn multiplexer that had been vetoed multiple
times.  Why did this happen?


  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-20 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-20 14:44 [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs David Howells
2004-10-20 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-10-20 17:50   ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-20 18:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 15:49 ` [parisc-linux] " Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-20 16:16   ` David Howells
2004-10-20 17:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-10-20 22:01 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-20 22:56   ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 23:04     ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 David S. Miller
2004-10-20 23:25       ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 23:41         ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 David S. Miller
2004-10-21  0:10           ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Andi Kleen
2004-10-21  8:03           ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-21  1:55       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-21  8:47       ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Jan-Benedict Glaw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041020152957.GA21774@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=linux-390@vm.marist.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@m17n.org \
    --cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox