From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@m17n.org, linux-390@vm.marist.edu,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:16:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7779.1098288977@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041020154922.GV16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
> Um, no. Should be ENTRY_COMP() if there's compat syscalls.
Not all archs (of which PA-Risc is an example) seem to require the same fixups
on the same syscalls. In some instances, the upper half of the register is
implicitly zero on 32-bit syscall entry to a 64-bit kernel. In such cases,
none of my syscalls require fixing up, assuming the pointers are automatically
correct.
> And those particular syscall numbers have already been assigned (blame Linus
> for dropping the PA-RISC patch on the floor instead of including it in
> 2.6.9).
There's not a lot I can do about that, except wave a patch under Linus's nose
and see who complains. Can you allocate three syscall numbers for me for
parisc?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-20 14:44 [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs David Howells
2004-10-20 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 17:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-20 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 15:49 ` [parisc-linux] " Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-20 16:16 ` David Howells [this message]
2004-10-20 17:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-10-20 22:01 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-20 22:56 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 23:04 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 David S. Miller
2004-10-20 23:25 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 23:41 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 David S. Miller
2004-10-21 0:10 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Andi Kleen
2004-10-21 8:03 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-21 1:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-21 8:47 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7779.1098288977@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-390@vm.marist.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-sh@m17n.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox