From: Erich Focht <efocht@hpce.nec.com>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Takayoshi Kochi <t-kochi@bq.jp.nec.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Externalize SLIT table
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:31:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411041631.42627.efocht@hpce.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041104141337.GA18445@sgi.com>
On Thursday 04 November 2004 15:13, Jack Steiner wrote:
> I think it would also be useful to have a similar cpu-to-cpu distance
> metric:
> % cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/distance
> 10 20 40 60
>
> This gives the same information but is cpu-centric rather than
> node centric.
I don't see the use of that once you have some way to find the logical
CPU to node number mapping. The "node distances" are meant to be
proportional to the memory access latency ratios (20 means 2 times
larger than local (intra-node) access, which is by definition 10).
If the cpu_to_cpu distance is necessary because there is a hierarchy
in the memory blocks inside one node, then maybe the definition of a
node should be changed...
We currently have (at least in -mm kernels):
% ls /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpu*
for finding out which CPUs belong to which nodes. Together with
/sys/devices/system/node/node0/distances
this should be enough for user space NUMA tools.
Regards,
Erich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-04 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-03 20:56 Externalize SLIT table Jack Steiner
2004-11-04 1:59 ` Takayoshi Kochi
2004-11-04 4:07 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-04 4:57 ` Takayoshi Kochi
2004-11-04 6:37 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-05 16:08 ` Jack Steiner
2004-11-05 16:26 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-05 16:44 ` Jack Steiner
2004-11-06 11:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-06 12:48 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-06 13:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-05 17:13 ` Erich Focht
2004-11-05 19:13 ` Jack Steiner
2004-11-09 19:23 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-11-04 14:13 ` Jack Steiner
2004-11-04 14:29 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-04 15:31 ` Erich Focht [this message]
2004-11-04 17:04 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-04 19:36 ` Jack Steiner
2004-11-09 19:45 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-11-09 19:43 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-11-09 20:34 ` Mark Goodwin
2004-11-09 22:00 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-11-09 23:58 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-11-10 5:05 ` Mark Goodwin
2004-11-10 18:45 ` Erich Focht
2004-11-10 22:09 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-11-18 16:39 ` Jack Steiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200411041631.42627.efocht@hpce.nec.com \
--to=efocht@hpce.nec.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=t-kochi@bq.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox