* [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64
2005-03-29 12:22 [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2005-03-29 12:32 ` Amit Gud
2005-03-29 14:18 ` Amit Gud
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Amit Gud @ 2005-03-29 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Replace pci_find_{device,subsys} with pci_get_{device,subsys}.
Signed-off-by: Amit Gud <gud@eth.net>
---
diff -upr orig-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c work-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c
--- orig-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c 2005-03-15 21:00:10.000000000 +0530
+++ work-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c 2005-03-24 15:29:23.539955472 +0530
@@ -365,8 +365,9 @@ static int __init sn_pci_init(void)
*/
while ((pci_dev - pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_dev)) != NULL) {
+ pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_dev)) != NULL) {
sn_pci_fixup_slot(pci_dev);
+ pci_dev_put(dev);
}
sn_ioif_inited = 1; /* sn I/O infrastructure now initialized */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64
2005-03-29 12:22 [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64 Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-29 12:32 ` Amit Gud
@ 2005-03-29 14:18 ` Amit Gud
2005-03-30 5:58 ` Greg KH
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Amit Gud @ 2005-03-29 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 05:50:09PM +0530, Amit Gud wrote:
>
>>Replace pci_find_{device,subsys} with pci_get_{device,subsys}.
>
>
> should be for_each_pci_dev
>
Yes, will address such replacements seperately.
Thanks,
AG
--
May the source be with you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64
2005-03-29 12:22 [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64 Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-29 12:32 ` Amit Gud
2005-03-29 14:18 ` Amit Gud
@ 2005-03-30 5:58 ` Greg KH
2005-03-30 6:53 ` Amit Gud
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2005-03-30 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 05:50:09PM +0530, Amit Gud wrote:
> Replace pci_find_{device,subsys} with pci_get_{device,subsys}.
>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Gud <gud@eth.net>
>
> ---
> diff -upr orig-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c work-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c
> --- orig-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c 2005-03-15 21:00:10.000000000 +0530
> +++ work-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c 2005-03-24 15:29:23.539955472 +0530
> @@ -365,8 +365,9 @@ static int __init sn_pci_init(void)
> */
>
> while ((pci_dev > - pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_dev)) != NULL) {
> + pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_dev)) != NULL) {
> sn_pci_fixup_slot(pci_dev);
> + pci_dev_put(dev);
> }
Argh, no, this is wrong. And I think you did this in every one of the
patches you sent out, so please send a retraction for every one of them
too, I don't feel like doing it...
You should not do a pci_dev_put() in a loop like this. Please go read
the documentation for the pci_get_device() function, it explains how to
use it...
So, sorry, but I'm not going to apply any of these patches.
Next time try sending just a few of them out, to see what the reaction
is, and if you are doing it properly.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64
2005-03-29 12:22 [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64 Christoph Hellwig
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-30 5:58 ` Greg KH
@ 2005-03-30 6:53 ` Amit Gud
2005-03-30 9:45 ` Greg KH
2005-03-30 10:31 ` Amit Gud
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Amit Gud @ 2005-03-30 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 05:50:09PM +0530, Amit Gud wrote:
>
>>Replace pci_find_{device,subsys} with pci_get_{device,subsys}.
>>
>>
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Amit Gud <gud@eth.net>
>>
>>---
>>diff -upr orig-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c work-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c
>>--- orig-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c 2005-03-15 21:00:10.000000000 +0530
>>+++ work-2.6.12-rc1/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c 2005-03-24 15:29:23.539955472 +0530
>>@@ -365,8 +365,9 @@ static int __init sn_pci_init(void)
>> */
>>
>> while ((pci_dev >>- pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_dev)) != NULL) {
>>+ pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_dev)) != NULL) {
>> sn_pci_fixup_slot(pci_dev);
>>+ pci_dev_put(dev);
>> }
>
>
> Argh, no, this is wrong. And I think you did this in every one of the
> patches you sent out, so please send a retraction for every one of them
> too, I don't feel like doing it...
>
> You should not do a pci_dev_put() in a loop like this. Please go read
> the documentation for the pci_get_device() function, it explains how to
> use it...
Here admittedly, the variable is wrong (should be pci_dev and not dev). But
I don't see why pci_dev_put() should not be used in a loop. If I know it right, pci_get_device()
finds a particular device starting from the last argument and increments the reference count and pci_dev_put just decrements it
(which if becomes zero *pci_dev->dev->kobj is kfree()d, but the orginal struct pci_dev is still there (not-NULL), so
pci_get_device can start finding the device (starting from pci_dev), from where it had left off last time).
pci_find_device() is a non-safe way of finding a device, where it finds a particluar device but doesn't bother
incrementing the reference count.
So if we are to replace pci_find_device with pci_get_device, how should we go about in this particular case, which
apparently is the case with many other places where pci_find_device is used. The way I did seemed logical to me:
find the device - accept it - work with it - jerk it off.
Am I missing out something very obvious?
AG
--
May the source be with you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64
2005-03-29 12:22 [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64 Christoph Hellwig
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-30 6:53 ` Amit Gud
@ 2005-03-30 9:45 ` Greg KH
2005-03-30 10:31 ` Amit Gud
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2005-03-30 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:29:00PM +0530, Amit Gud wrote:
> So if we are to replace pci_find_device with pci_get_device, how should we
> go about in this particular case, which
> apparently is the case with many other places where pci_find_device is
> used. The way I did seemed logical to me:
> find the device - accept it - work with it - jerk it off.
> Am I missing out something very obvious?
Please read the last sentence of the documentation for the
pci_get_device() function. I think you missed that :)
That sentence tells us that you do not need to call pci_dev_put() within
a pci_get_device() while loop.
So please, email all of the maintainers who you sent those patches to
and ask them to not apply them...
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64
2005-03-29 12:22 [PATCH 3/91] get rid of pci_find_{device,subsys} arch/ia64 Christoph Hellwig
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-30 9:45 ` Greg KH
@ 2005-03-30 10:31 ` Amit Gud
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Amit Gud @ 2005-03-30 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Amit Gud wrote:
> replace pci_find_{device,subsys} with pci_get_{device,subsys}
>
Please don't apply, its incorrect.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Best,
AG
--
May the source be with you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread