public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@horizon.com
To: clameter@sgi.com
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Synchronizing Bit operations V2
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 01:33:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060331013346.913.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603301615540.2023@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

> The following patchset implements the ability to specify a
> synchronization mode for bit operations.
>
> I.e. instead of set_bit(x,y) we can do set_bit(x,y, mode).
> 
> The following modes are supported:

Yuck.

The only conceivable reason for passing the mode as a separate parameter is
- To change the mode dynamically at run time.
- To share common code when the sequence is long and mostly shared
  between the various modes (as in open(2) or ll_rw_block()).

I sincerely hope neither of those apply in this case.

On the downside, it's more typing and uglier than a series of

frob_bit_nonatomic()
	(probably temporarily or permanently aliased to frob_bit())
frob_bit_atomic()
frob_bit_acquire()
frob_bit_release()
frob_bit_barrier()

functions, and those also prevent you from doing something silly like
frob_bit(x, y, O_DIRECT).  Also, the MODE_ prefix might be wanted by
something else.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-31  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-30 21:02 Bit operations with the ability to specify a synchronization mode Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  0:18 ` Synchronizing Bit operations V2 Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  0:39   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  0:42     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  0:45     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  0:42   ` David Mosberger-Tang
2006-03-31  0:49     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  6:10     ` Chris Wright
2006-03-31  0:44   ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-31  3:28     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  4:12       ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-31 17:43         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-01  2:56           ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-31  0:50   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  0:51     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  0:53   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  0:55     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  0:56   ` Luck, Tony
2006-03-31  0:58     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-02  7:59       ` Russell King
2006-03-31  0:59   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  1:09     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  1:04   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  1:13     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  1:13   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  1:29   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  1:37     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  1:33   ` linux [this message]
2006-03-31  1:40     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  2:35   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  2:37     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  2:45   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  2:53     ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-31  3:01     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  2:51   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  2:55     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  3:02   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  3:08     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  3:10   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  3:12     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  3:11   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  3:14   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  3:20     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31  3:17   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  3:23   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  3:37   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  6:15   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31  7:34     ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-31 13:28   ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-31 16:22     ` Hans Boehm
2006-03-31 16:37       ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-31 17:46         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31 17:45     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31 17:48       ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-31 17:56         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-02  7:54           ` Russell King
2006-03-31 18:57   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31 19:41   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31 21:15     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-03-31 21:24   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-03-31 21:28     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-01  2:16       ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060331013346.913.qmail@science.horizon.com \
    --to=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox