From: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA ATAPI work in progress
Date: 14 May 2004 12:28:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1084559309.4017.59.camel@patibmrh9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40A3E595.8000003@pobox.com>
> > +static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, u8
> *scsicmd)
> > +{
> > + int bcl = (8 * 0x400); /* PIO "byte count limit" */
>
> Make this a more obvious "8 * 1024".
>
> For the sake of correctness, I prefer to call this "DRQ block size"
> rather than the more ambigous "byte count limit".
>
> This is important because some AHCI SATA controllers can only transfer
> a _single_ DRQ block per disk transaction. In anticipation of the
> demise of PIO, no doubt :)
Perhaps I should check:
Are we agreed that this bcl is the max permissible byte count for a PIO
DRQ, distinct from the actual byte count of a PIO DRQ?
For example, if our limit is x800, then the t13.org texts let the device
reply with x200 + x600 + x800 + x400 ... They allow any distribution of
addends, so long as no single INTRQ asks for more than the limit we set.
ATAPI often, but not reliably, implies x800 bytes/lba = 2 KiB/lba, by
way of implying but not requiring PDT x05 MMC = DVD/CD.
Pat LaVarre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-14 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-12 20:20 SATA ATAPI work in progress Pat LaVarre
2004-05-12 20:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 23:14 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-13 15:07 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-13 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-13 21:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-13 21:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-13 21:36 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-13 21:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-13 21:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-14 18:23 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-14 18:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-14 19:37 ` when limited to a single DRQ block per disk transaction Pat LaVarre
2004-05-14 19:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-14 20:12 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-14 23:47 ` SATA ATAPI work in progress Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 0:02 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 0:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-15 13:06 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 13:49 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 15:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-15 15:49 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 15:56 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 16:04 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 16:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-15 16:43 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 16:50 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 16:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-15 0:46 ` [PATCH] " Jeff Garzik
2004-05-15 13:08 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 13:10 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-15 14:13 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-05-14 18:28 ` Pat LaVarre [this message]
2004-05-14 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1084559309.4017.59.camel@patibmrh9 \
--to=p.lavarre@ieee.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox