Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: dac: adi-axi-dac: Turn dev_info() into dev_dbg()

[David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>]

On 12/3/25 9:53 AM, Nuno Sá via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> 
> We should not abuse logging and logging a successful probe is clearly
> abuse. Turn it into dev_dbg().
> 
> If it turns out the IP version is that relevant we can make it easy to
> get through a new debugfs interface later on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
> index 0c7b62f5357d..f536158beb4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
> @@ -1000,10 +1000,10 @@ static int axi_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  						"cannot create device.");
>  	}
>  
> -	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "AXI DAC IP core (%d.%.2d.%c) probed\n",
> -		 ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MAJOR(ver),
> -		 ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MINOR(ver),
> -		 ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_PATCH(ver));
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "AXI DAC IP core (%d.%.2d.%c) probed\n",

Didn't ADI HDL versioning policy change to semver so that the last number
is no longer necessarily an ASCII character?

We could probably change this to %d.%.d.%d while here.

> +		ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MAJOR(ver),
> +		ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MINOR(ver),
> +		ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_PATCH(ver));
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>