Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, wei.huang2@amd.com,
	jsnitsel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/amd: Refactor helper function for setting / clearing GCR3
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:45:23 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230927164523.GO13795@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d47919e-cc2c-d151-f020-e2090fd1c287@amd.com>

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:51:20AM +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> >>  	if (pte == NULL)
> >>  		return -ENOMEM;
> >>  
> >> -	*pte = (cr3 & PAGE_MASK) | GCR3_VALID;
> >> +	*pte = (gcr3 & PAGE_MASK) | GCR3_VALID;
> >> +	__amd_iommu_flush_tlb(dev_data->domain, pasid);
> > 
> > This flushing doesn't seem to make sense to me, it shouldn't take in a
> > domain parameter.
> >
> > I'm reading the spec here so I may get this wrong but.. It looks like
> > the IOTLB cache is tagged by (DTE.domain_id, PASID)?
> > 
> 
> Yeah. It works, but name is confusing.

How does it work? You haven't explained anything about why does it
work.

Nothing guarantees that domain->id is per-device. It is emphatically
not, it is per-domain. It happens to act like it is per-device when
using the DMA API, as DMA API does not share domains across
groups. However iommufd does share domains and so this is not a
correct assumption.

You said below that you think the DTE.domain_id is per-device. I agree
that would fix this bug, if true. If it is to be per-device it should
come from the struct iommu_dev_data, not from the domain->id. This
should happen any time a GCR3 table is in-use. v1 mode is fine to use
a per-domain 'domain_id'.

> amd_iommu_device_flush_pasid_all(dev_data, pasid)
> {
>         // Flush domain
>        // Flush single device ATS
> }

That would make more logical sense, but it does not resolve the issue
of correctly choosing DTE.domain_id so the cache tags don't alias.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-27 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-16 17:40 [PATCH v2 00/10] iommu/amd: SVA Support (part 3) - refactor support for GCR3 table Vasant Hegde
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu/amd: Use struct protection_domain in helper functions Vasant Hegde
2023-08-23 16:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-24  6:12     ` Vasant Hegde
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu/amd: Introduce get_amd_iommu_from_dev() Vasant Hegde
2023-09-13 14:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-14  8:21     ` Vasant Hegde
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu/amd: Introduce struct protection_domain.pd_mode Vasant Hegde
2023-09-13 14:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/amd: Introduce per-device GCR3 table Vasant Hegde
2023-09-13 14:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-14  8:24     ` Vasant Hegde
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/amd: Use protection_domain.flags to check page table mode Vasant Hegde
2023-09-13 14:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/amd: Refactor helper function for setting / clearing GCR3 Vasant Hegde
2023-09-13 15:12   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-27  6:21     ` Vasant Hegde
2023-09-27 16:45       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-10-10  6:02         ` Vasant Hegde
2023-10-10 14:38           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-13 15:45             ` Vasant Hegde
2023-10-13 16:01               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu/amd: Refactor helper function for attaching / detaching device Vasant Hegde
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] iommu/amd: Refactor protection_domain helper functions Vasant Hegde
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu/amd: Refactor GCR3 table " Vasant Hegde
2023-08-16 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu/amd: Remove unused GCR3 table parameters from struct protection_domain Vasant Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230927164523.GO13795@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    --cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox