From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, wei.huang2@amd.com,
jsnitsel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/17] iommu/amd: Refactor GCR3 table helper functions
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:24:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c60ed34e-063a-b9fb-9255-365d3662f076@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122182607.GP50608@ziepe.ca>
On 1/22/2024 11:56 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 03:53:18PM +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
>> Jason,
>>
>>
>> On 1/20/2024 1:29 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 04:53:32PM +0000, Vasant Hegde wrote:
>>>
>>>> @@ -1738,22 +1744,22 @@ static int get_gcr3_levels(int pasids)
>>>> return levels ? (DIV_ROUND_UP(levels, 9) - 1) : levels;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -/* Note: This function expects iommu_domain->lock to be held prior calling the function. */
>>>> -static int setup_gcr3_table(struct protection_domain *domain, int pasids)
>>>> +static int setup_gcr3_table(struct gcr3_tbl_info *gcr3_info,
>>>> + int nid, int pasids)
>>>> {
>>>> int levels = get_gcr3_levels(pasids);
>>>>
>>>> if (levels > amd_iommu_max_glx_val)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> - domain->gcr3_tbl = alloc_pgtable_page(domain->nid, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>> - if (domain->gcr3_tbl == NULL)
>>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + if (gcr3_info->gcr3_tbl)
>>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>>>
>>>> - domain->glx = levels;
>>>> - domain->flags |= PD_IOMMUV2_MASK;
>>>> + gcr3_info->gcr3_tbl = alloc_pgtable_page(nid, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (gcr3_info->gcr3_tbl == NULL)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>> - amd_iommu_domain_update(domain);
>>>> + gcr3_info->glx = levels;
>>>
>>> I think this patch should also move the domain_id
>>> allocation/deallocation into setup_gcr3_table()/free_gcr3_table()
>>
>> We do domain allocation in device attach path only. But GCR3 table
>> allocation/setup can happen while enabling SVA (like passthrough -> SVA path).
>> Hence I have kept it in attach() path itself.
>
> Huh? That doesn't sound right. Any time you install a GCR3 table into
> a DTE you need to get a domain_id *for that GCR3 table*. There is no
> other place to get a domain id!?
Its already fixed. If its per-device-domain-ID it comes from dev_data/gcr3_info.
Else it will come from protection_domain->domain_id.
domain_id_is_per_dev() decides how to allocate domain ID. Right now for V2 and
pass through mode we allocate per-device-domain-ID as they can switch to SVA.
>
> All this logic should be shared between the pasid and rid attach
> paths.>
> The passthrough thing is only an issue of DTE construction.
>
> If you build a DTE with a GCR3 table and RID=IDENTITY then you set
> some bits, and that is it. Detect that case directly when you build
> the DTE. It should have no effect on what domain ID is used to tag
> translations retrived from a GCR3 table.
We build DTE as soon as we attach device to domain.
Now moving domain ID allocation to setup_gcr3_table complicates things.
- In attach_device() path we want to allocate domain ID but not GCR3 table
We can allocate GCR3 table, but if we don't use it its waste of memory.
- In SVA enablement path we want to allocate GCR3 table
But by then domain ID should have been allocated. We don't want to allocate
another domain_ID and change ID in SVA enablement path as our domain ID is not
specific to GCR3.
>
> (I say that with some trepidation because it isn't clear to me how the
> AMD IOMMU caches the DTE entries themselves)
>
> I've said before the DTE construction should be fixed up before making
> things more complicated :\
We are not making anything complicated here!
>
>>> It is missing some error handling too
>>
>> Where?
>
> See my diff I sent, it was error unwinds around gcr3 table failure.
Ok.
>
>>> And domain_id_is_per_dev() is pretty redundant once you do that. See below
>>
>> We need to handle passthrough as well. It doesn't make sense to allocate and
>> keep GCR3 table when we are not going to use it.
>
> Then don't, and my diff didn't - but check for the passthrough case
> directly against the attached domain as identity.
We don't want to add condition check that depends on code path:
like attach_device : allocate domain ID but not GCR3
SVA path : Allocate GCR3 but not domain ID.
-Vasant
>
>>> @@ -1902,7 +1911,7 @@ static void set_dte_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu,
>>> struct dev_table_entry *dev_table = get_dev_table(iommu);
>>> struct gcr3_tbl_info *gcr3_info = &dev_data->gcr3_info;
>>>
>>> - if (domain_id_is_per_dev(domain))
>>> + if (gcr3_info && gcr3_info->gcr3_tbl) {
>>> domid = dev_data->gcr3_info.domid;
>>> else
>>> domid = domain->id;
>
> Because here it already has the (gcr3_info && gcr3_info->gcr3_tbl)
> test below to decide if the gcr3 will be written to the DTE, so of
> course it should be the same test to decide where the domain id comes
> from.
>
>>> @@ -2018,15 +2027,10 @@ static int do_attach(struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data,
>>> domain->dev_iommu[iommu->index] += 1;
>>> domain->dev_cnt += 1;
>>>
>>> - /* Allocate per device domain ID */
>>> - if (domain_id_is_per_dev(domain))
>>> - dev_data->gcr3_info.domid = domain_id_alloc();
>>> -
>
> And this gets moved into this test:
>
>>> /* Init GCR3 table and update device table */
>>> if (domain->pd_mode == PD_MODE_V2) {
>
> Here, which is obviously correct at this point as you only need a GCR3
> table when installing a V2 table on the RID.
>
>>> @@ -2073,10 +2077,6 @@ static void do_detach(struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data)
>>> /* decrease reference counters - needs to happen after the flushes */
>>> domain->dev_iommu[iommu->index] -= 1;
>>> domain->dev_cnt -= 1;
>>> -
>>> - /* Free per device domain ID */
>>> - if (domain_id_is_per_dev(domain))
>>> - domain_id_free(dev_data->gcr3_info.domid);
>
> And this got moved into the gcr3 free a few lines up that checked the
> pd_mode.
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 16:53 [PATCH v5 00/17] iommu/amd: SVA Support (part 3) - refactor support for GCR3 table Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] iommu/amd: Pass struct iommu_dev_data to set_dte_entry() Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 02/17] iommu/amd: Enable Guest Translation before registering devices Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 03/17] iommu/amd: Introduce get_amd_iommu_from_dev() Vasant Hegde
2024-01-19 19:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] iommu/amd: Introduce struct protection_domain.pd_mode Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] iommu/amd: Introduce per-device GCR3 table Vasant Hegde
2024-01-19 19:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] iommu/amd: Use protection_domain.flags to check page table mode Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] iommu/amd: Introduce per-device domain ID to workaround potential TLB aliasing issue Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/17] iommu/amd: Add support for device based TLB invalidation Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] iommu/amd: Rearrange GCR3 table setup code Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] iommu: Introduce iommu_group_mutex_assert() Vasant Hegde
2024-01-19 19:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-22 6:24 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-01-22 18:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-23 5:27 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] iommu/amd: Refactor helper function for setting / clearing GCR3 Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] iommu/amd: Refactor attaching / detaching device functions Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] iommu/amd: Refactor protection_domain helper functions Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] iommu/amd: Refactor GCR3 table " Vasant Hegde
2024-01-19 19:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-22 10:23 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-01-22 18:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-23 8:54 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2024-01-25 1:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 12:11 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-01-25 15:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] iommu/amd: Remove unused flush pasid functions Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] iommu/amd: Rearrange device flush code Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] iommu/amd: Remove unused GCR3 table parameters from struct protection_domain Vasant Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c60ed34e-063a-b9fb-9255-365d3662f076@amd.com \
--to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox