From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
<jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] iommu: Add new flag to explictly request PASID capable domain
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:57:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2871fed-3d69-4f68-9d82-53b619a5fced@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017140137.6028-4-vasant.hegde@amd.com>
On 2024/10/17 22:01, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
>
> Introduce new flag (IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_PASID) to domain_alloc_users() ops.
> If both IOMMU and device supports PASID it will allocate domain.
> Otherwise return error.
I think my iommufd pasid series depends on the flag added here. As Jason
suggested[1], I would add a check in iommufd to ensure all the domains that
used in the pasid path are allocated with the IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_PASID flag.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/5a6c2676-256a-4fa5-b9a0-e433d4e933c9@intel.com/
>
> Also modify __iommu_group_alloc_default_domain() to call
> iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags() with appropriate flag when allocating
> paging domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> [Added __iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags() and description - Vasant]
> Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h | 6 +++++
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index e13d64ffd14f..107016b3ba3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <trace/events/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> #include <linux/msi.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/iommufd.h>
>
> #include "dma-iommu.h"
> #include "iommu-priv.h"
> @@ -99,6 +100,9 @@ static int __iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev);
> static int __iommu_attach_group(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct iommu_group *group);
> +static struct iommu_domain *__iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags(struct device *dev,
> + unsigned int type,
> + unsigned int flags);
>
> enum {
> IOMMU_SET_DOMAIN_MUST_SUCCEED = 1 << 0,
> @@ -1589,8 +1593,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsl_mc_device_group);
> static struct iommu_domain *
> __iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(struct iommu_group *group, int req_type)
> {
> + struct device *dev = iommu_group_first_dev(group);
> +
> if (group->default_domain && group->default_domain->type == req_type)
> return group->default_domain;
> +
> + /*
> + * When allocating the DMA API domain assume that the driver is going to
> + * use PASID and make sure the RID's domain is PASID compatible.
> + */
> + if (req_type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_PAGING)
> + return __iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags(dev, req_type,
> + dev->iommu->max_pasids ? IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_PASID : 0);
> +
> return __iommu_group_domain_alloc(group, req_type);
> }
>
> @@ -2026,16 +2041,9 @@ struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain_alloc(const struct bus_type *bus)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_domain_alloc);
>
> -/**
> - * iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags() - Allocate a paging domain
> - * @dev: device for which the domain is allocated
> - * @flags: Bitmap of iommufd_hwpt_alloc_flags
> - *
> - * Allocate a paging domain which will be managed by a kernel driver. Return
> - * allocated domain if successful, or a ERR pointer for failure.
> - */
> -struct iommu_domain *iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags(struct device *dev,
> - unsigned int flags)
> +static struct iommu_domain *__iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags(struct device *dev,
> + unsigned int type,
> + unsigned int flags)
> {
> const struct iommu_ops *ops;
> struct iommu_domain *domain;
> @@ -2059,9 +2067,24 @@ struct iommu_domain *iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags(struct device *dev,
> if (!domain)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - iommu_domain_init(domain, IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED, ops);
> + iommu_domain_init(domain, type, ops);
> return domain;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags() - Allocate a paging domain
> + * @dev: device for which the domain is allocated
> + * @flags: Bitmap of iommufd_hwpt_alloc_flags
> + *
> + * Allocate a paging domain which will be managed by a kernel driver. Return
> + * allocated domain if successful, or a ERR pointer for failure.
> + */
> +struct iommu_domain *iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags(struct device *dev,
> + unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + return __iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags(dev,
> + IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED, flags);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags);
>
> void iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> index 72010f71c5e4..d1b07f4d9d32 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> @@ -359,11 +359,17 @@ struct iommu_vfio_ioas {
> * enforced on device attachment
> * @IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID: The fault_id field of hwpt allocation data is
> * valid.
> + * @IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_PASID: Requests a domain that can be used with PASID. The
> + * domain can be attached to any PASID on the device.
> + * Any domain attached to the non-PASID part of the
> + * device must also be flaged, otherwise attaching a
> + * PASID will blocked.
Just a double check.
Can I interpret this as "all the domains used by a pasid-capable device
(both the RID and the PASIDs) should be allocated with this flag set"?
> */
> enum iommufd_hwpt_alloc_flags {
> IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT = 1 << 0,
> IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_DIRTY_TRACKING = 1 << 1,
> IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID = 1 << 2,
> + IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_PASID = 1 << 3,
> };
>
> /**
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 14:01 [PATCH v3 00/12] iommu: Domain allocation enhancements Vasant Hegde
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] iommu: Refactor __iommu_domain_alloc() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-21 7:29 ` Yi Liu
2024-10-21 9:10 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] iommu: Introduce iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 3:29 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-21 7:47 ` Yi Liu
2024-10-21 9:19 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] iommu: Add new flag to explictly request PASID capable domain Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 3:43 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-18 12:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-21 5:02 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-18 14:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-21 10:02 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-21 7:57 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2024-10-23 8:52 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-21 7:59 ` Yi Liu
2024-10-22 4:54 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enhance domain_alloc_user() to allocate " Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 14:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-21 8:57 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] iommu/amd: Add helper function to check GIOSUP/GTSUP Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 14:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] iommu/amd: Move V2 page table support check to early_amd_iommu_init() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 14:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] iommu/amd: Separate page table setup from domain allocation Vasant Hegde
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] iommu/amd: Pass page table type as param to pdom_setup_pgtable() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 14:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] iommu/amd: Enhance amd_iommu_domain_alloc_user() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 14:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-21 9:00 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-22 7:48 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-23 8:47 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] iommu/amd: Implement global identity domain Vasant Hegde
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] iommu: Put domain allocation in __iommu_group_alloc_blocking_domain() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 4:02 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-17 14:01 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] iommu: Create __iommu_alloc_identity_domain() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 4:04 ` Baolu Lu
2024-10-18 14:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-21 6:38 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-18 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] iommu: Domain allocation enhancements Baolu Lu
2024-10-18 12:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-21 9:08 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-22 7:50 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-23 8:48 ` Vasant Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2871fed-3d69-4f68-9d82-53b619a5fced@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox