From: fklassen at appneta.com (Fred Klassen)
Subject: [PATCH net 1/4] net/udp_gso: Allow TX timestamp with UDP GSO
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 14:06:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523210651.80902-2-fklassen@appneta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523210651.80902-1-fklassen@appneta.com>
Fixes an issue where TX Timestamps are not arriving on the error queue
when UDP_SEGMENT CMSG type is combined with CMSG type SO_TIMESTAMPING.
This can be illustrated with an updated updgso_bench_tx program which
includes the '-T' option to test for this condition.
./udpgso_bench_tx -4ucTPv -S 1472 -l2 -D 172.16.120.18
poll timeout
udp tx: 0 MB/s 1 calls/s 1 msg/s
The "poll timeout" message above indicates that TX timestamp never
arrived.
It also appears that other TX CMSG types cause similar issues, for
example trying to set SOL_IP/IP_TOS.
./udpgso_bench_tx -4ucPv -S 1472 -q 182 -l2 -D 172.16.120.18
poll timeout
udp tx: 0 MB/s 1 calls/s 1 msg/s
This patch preserves tx_flags for the first UDP GSO segment. This
mirrors the stack's behaviour for IPv4 fragments.
Fixes: ee80d1ebe5ba ("udp: add udp gso")
Signed-off-by: Fred Klassen <fklassen at appneta.com>
---
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
index 065334b41d57..33de347695ae 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
@@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,
seg = segs;
uh = udp_hdr(seg);
+ /* preserve TX timestamp and zero-copy info for first segment */
+ skb_shinfo(seg)->tskey = skb_shinfo(gso_skb)->tskey;
+ skb_shinfo(seg)->tx_flags = skb_shinfo(gso_skb)->tx_flags;
+
/* compute checksum adjustment based on old length versus new */
newlen = htons(sizeof(*uh) + mss);
check = csum16_add(csum16_sub(uh->check, uh->len), newlen);
--
2.11.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: fklassen@appneta.com (Fred Klassen)
Subject: [PATCH net 1/4] net/udp_gso: Allow TX timestamp with UDP GSO
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 14:06:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523210651.80902-2-fklassen@appneta.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190523210648.SAOsA1xo9RUOlfHl5cWtNCk9EbI2RlEqviDV0sTPt60@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523210651.80902-1-fklassen@appneta.com>
Fixes an issue where TX Timestamps are not arriving on the error queue
when UDP_SEGMENT CMSG type is combined with CMSG type SO_TIMESTAMPING.
This can be illustrated with an updated updgso_bench_tx program which
includes the '-T' option to test for this condition.
./udpgso_bench_tx -4ucTPv -S 1472 -l2 -D 172.16.120.18
poll timeout
udp tx: 0 MB/s 1 calls/s 1 msg/s
The "poll timeout" message above indicates that TX timestamp never
arrived.
It also appears that other TX CMSG types cause similar issues, for
example trying to set SOL_IP/IP_TOS.
./udpgso_bench_tx -4ucPv -S 1472 -q 182 -l2 -D 172.16.120.18
poll timeout
udp tx: 0 MB/s 1 calls/s 1 msg/s
This patch preserves tx_flags for the first UDP GSO segment. This
mirrors the stack's behaviour for IPv4 fragments.
Fixes: ee80d1ebe5ba ("udp: add udp gso")
Signed-off-by: Fred Klassen <fklassen at appneta.com>
---
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
index 065334b41d57..33de347695ae 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
@@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,
seg = segs;
uh = udp_hdr(seg);
+ /* preserve TX timestamp and zero-copy info for first segment */
+ skb_shinfo(seg)->tskey = skb_shinfo(gso_skb)->tskey;
+ skb_shinfo(seg)->tx_flags = skb_shinfo(gso_skb)->tx_flags;
+
/* compute checksum adjustment based on old length versus new */
newlen = htons(sizeof(*uh) + mss);
check = csum16_add(csum16_sub(uh->check, uh->len), newlen);
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-23 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-23 21:06 [PATCH net 0/4] Allow TX timestamp with UDP GSO fklassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` fklassen [this message]
2019-05-23 21:06 ` [PATCH net 1/4] net/udp_gso: " Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:39 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-23 21:39 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24 1:38 ` fklassen
2019-05-24 1:38 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-24 4:53 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-24 4:53 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24 16:34 ` fklassen
2019-05-24 16:34 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-24 19:29 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-24 19:29 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24 22:01 ` fklassen
2019-05-24 22:01 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-25 15:20 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-25 15:20 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-25 18:47 ` fklassen
2019-05-25 18:47 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-27 1:30 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-27 1:30 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-27 2:09 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-27 2:09 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-25 20:46 ` fklassen
2019-05-25 20:46 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:59 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-23 21:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-25 20:09 ` fklassen
2019-05-25 20:09 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-25 20:47 ` fklassen
2019-05-25 20:47 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` [PATCH net 2/4] net/udpgso_bench_tx: options to exercise TX CMSG fklassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:45 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-23 21:45 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-23 21:52 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-23 21:52 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24 2:10 ` fklassen
2019-05-24 2:10 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` [PATCH net 3/4] net/udpgso_bench_tx: fix sendmmsg on unconnected socket fklassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` [PATCH net 4/4] net/udpgso_bench_tx: audit error queue fklassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:56 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-23 21:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24 1:27 ` fklassen
2019-05-24 1:27 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-24 5:02 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-24 5:02 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-27 21:30 ` fklassen
2019-05-27 21:30 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-27 21:46 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-27 21:46 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-27 22:56 ` fklassen
2019-05-27 22:56 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-28 1:15 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-28 1:15 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-28 5:19 ` fklassen
2019-05-28 5:19 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-28 15:08 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-28 15:08 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-28 16:57 ` fklassen
2019-05-28 16:57 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-28 17:07 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-28 17:07 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-28 17:11 ` willemdebruijn.kernel
2019-05-28 17:11 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190523210651.80902-2-fklassen@appneta.com \
--to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox