Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Patel <ripatel@wii.dev>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86: ban 32-bit sigreturn when user IBT enabled
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 00:14:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aguralnvvMKzIDxH@wii.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F10D66BF-C851-4B14-81D7-E5F1E15A325B@zytor.com>

On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 01:22:19PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On May 17, 2026 11:30:21 AM PDT, Richard Patel <ripatel@wii.dev> wrote:
> >IBT is not implemented for 32-bit and cannot be enabled using a
> >32-bit syscall. However, a 64-bit thread could far jump into 32-bit.
> >Therefore, 32-bit sigreturn must be banned until IBT supports that
> >environment.
> Dumb question: is there any reason not to just enable it for 32 bits? It doesn't seem that it would be that big of a delta to Just Do It.™
> 
> That being said, I suspect the number of users will be very small if any.

Yes, partially, good call. It'd be tricky for legacy IA32 signals.
sigframe_ia32 would need to be modified I think. For rt_sigframe_ia32
(rt_sigreturn) we can put it in ucontext_ia32::uc_flags.

I'll fix it in v2 later this week and add tests.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-19  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-17 18:30 [PATCH 0/7] Usermode Indirect Branch Tracking Richard Patel
2026-05-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86: add userspace IBT config option Richard Patel
2026-05-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86: shstk: don't clobber IBT bits in U_CET MSR Richard Patel
2026-05-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86: signal handler support for IBT Richard Patel
2026-05-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86: ban 32-bit sigreturn when user IBT enabled Richard Patel
2026-05-18 20:22   ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-05-19  0:14     ` Richard Patel [this message]
2026-05-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: expose user IBT via PR_CFI_BRANCH_LANDING_PADS Richard Patel
2026-05-18  6:46   ` Richard Patel
2026-05-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/entry/vdso: build with IBT support Richard Patel
2026-05-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] selftests/x86: test usermode IBT Richard Patel
2026-05-18  7:36 ` [PATCH 0/7] Usermode Indirect Branch Tracking Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-18 16:25   ` Richard Patel
2026-05-18 19:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-19  9:33 ` David Laight
2026-05-19  9:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-19 13:14   ` Richard Patel
2026-05-19 13:28     ` David Laight
2026-05-19 14:18       ` Richard Patel
2026-05-19 14:42         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aguralnvvMKzIDxH@wii.dev \
    --to=ripatel@wii.dev \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox