From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>, "lee@kernel.org" <lee@kernel.org>,
"vadimp@nvidia.com" <vadimp@nvidia.com>,
"mpe@ellerman.id.au" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"npiggin@gmail.com" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"mazziesaccount@gmail.com" <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
"jic23@kernel.org" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"boqun.feng@gmail.com" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"kernel@salutedevices.com" <kernel@salutedevices.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] devm-helpers: introduce devm_mutex_init
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 13:01:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08cf2729-78c4-44a3-ac3f-78c652a527ff@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57ea099a-8b88-4b16-9b54-b81e5b28bcb6@salutedevices.com>
Le 07/12/2023 à 13:51, George Stark a écrit :
>
>
> On 12/7/23 15:28, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 07/12/2023 à 13:02, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
>>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 1:23 AM George Stark
>>> <gnstark@salutedevices.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/7/23 01:37, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>>> Le 06/12/2023 à 23:14, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> Looking at it closer, I have the feeling that you want to do
>>>>> similar to
>>>>> devm_gpio_request() in linux/gpio.h :
>>>>>
>>>>> In linux/mutex.h, add a prototype for devm_mutex_init() when
>>>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is defined and an empty static inline otherwise.
>>>>> Then define devm_mutex_init() in kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
>>>>
>>>> Yes, this would be almost perfect decision. BTW just as in linux/gpio.h
>>>> we wouldn't have to include whole "linux/device.h" into mutex.h, only
>>>> add forward declaration of struct device;
>>>
>>> In case you place it into a C-file. Otherwise you need a header for
>>> the API and that is not acceptable for mutex.h.
>>>
>>
>> Right, that's the reason why I'm suggesting to define devm_mutex_init()
>> in kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c.
>>
>> In linux/mutex.h, you define a stub for when CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not
>> set, and the prototype of devm_mutex_init() when CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is
>> set.
>
> Something like this:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
> index a33aa9eb9fc3..4a6041a7fd44 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mutex.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
> #include <linux/cleanup.h>
>
> +struct device;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> # define __DEP_MAP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \
> , .dep_map = { \
> @@ -127,6 +129,20 @@ extern void __mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const
> char *name,
> */
> extern bool mutex_is_locked(struct mutex *lock);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
There is already a CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES block, can you re-use it ?
> +
> +extern int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock);
'extern' is pointless and deprecated for function prototypes.
I know the kernel is full of them, but it is not a good reason to add
new ones.
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
> +{
> + mutex_init(lock);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
> /*
> * Preempt-RT variant based on rtmutexes.
> @@ -169,6 +185,13 @@ do { \
> \
> __mutex_init((mutex), #mutex, &__key); \
> } while (0)
> +
> +static inline int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
> +{
> + mutex_init(lock);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
> index bc8abb8549d2..d50dfa06e82c 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
>
> #include "mutex.h"
>
> @@ -104,3 +105,25 @@ void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *lock)
> }
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_destroy);
> +
> +static void devm_mutex_release(void *res)
> +{
> + mutex_destroy(res);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * devm_mutex_init - Resource-managed mutex initialization
> + * @dev: Device which lifetime mutex is bound to
> + * @lock: Pointer to a mutex
> + *
> + * Initialize mutex which is automatically destroyed when the driver is
> detached.
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
> +{
> + mutex_init(lock);
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_mutex_release, lock);
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_mutex_init);
> \ No newline at end of file
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 18:05 [PATCH v2 00/10] devm_led_classdev_register() usage problem George Stark
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] devm-helpers: introduce devm_mutex_init George Stark
2023-12-04 18:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-06 7:56 ` George Stark
2023-12-06 14:58 ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-04 23:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-05 6:20 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-12-06 15:01 ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-06 18:58 ` George Stark
2023-12-06 19:55 ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-06 21:02 ` Waiman Long
2023-12-07 0:37 ` George Stark
2023-12-07 2:16 ` Waiman Long
2023-12-07 21:29 ` Waiman Long
2023-12-06 22:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-06 22:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-06 23:24 ` George Stark
2023-12-07 11:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-07 12:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-07 12:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-07 12:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-07 12:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-07 12:51 ` George Stark
2023-12-07 13:01 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2023-12-07 13:24 ` George Stark
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] leds: aw2013: unlock mutex before destroying it George Stark
2023-12-04 18:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-04 23:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-06 8:37 ` George Stark
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] leds: aw2013: use devm API to cleanup module's resources George Stark
2023-12-04 18:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-04 23:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] leds: aw200xx: " George Stark
2023-12-04 18:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-04 23:17 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] leds: lp3952: " George Stark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08cf2729-78c4-44a3-ac3f-78c652a527ff@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=gnstark@salutedevices.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@salutedevices.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vadimp@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox