From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>,
pavel@ucw.cz, lee@kernel.org, vadimp@nvidia.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, mazziesaccount@gmail.com,
andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, jic23@kernel.org
Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel@salutedevices.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] devm-helpers: introduce devm_mutex_init
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 16:01:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81798fe5-f89e-482f-b0d0-674ccbfc3666@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231204180603.470421-2-gnstark@salutedevices.com>
Hi George,
On 12/4/23 19:05, George Stark wrote:
> Using of devm API leads to certain order of releasing resources.
> So all dependent resources which are not devm-wrapped should be deleted
> with respect to devm-release order. Mutex is one of such objects that
> often is bound to other resources and has no own devm wrapping.
> Since mutex_destroy() actually does nothing in non-debug builds
> frequently calling mutex_destroy() is just ignored which is safe for now
> but wrong formally and can lead to a problem if mutex_destroy() is
> extended so introduce devm_mutex_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>
> ---
> include/linux/devm-helpers.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/devm-helpers.h b/include/linux/devm-helpers.h
> index 74891802200d..2f56e476776f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/devm-helpers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/devm-helpers.h
> @@ -76,4 +76,22 @@ static inline int devm_work_autocancel(struct device *dev,
> return devm_add_action(dev, devm_work_drop, w);
> }
>
> +static inline void devm_mutex_release(void *res)
> +{
> + mutex_destroy(res);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * devm_mutex_init - Resource-managed mutex initialization
> + * @dev: Device which lifetime work is bound to
> + * @lock: Pointer to a mutex
> + *
> + * Initialize mutex which is automatically destroyed when driver is detached.
> + */
> +static inline int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
> +{
> + mutex_init(lock);
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_mutex_release, lock);
> +}
> +
> #endif
mutex_destroy() only actually does anything if CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
is set, otherwise it is an empty inline-stub.
Adding a devres resource to the device just to call an empty inline
stub which is a no-op seems like a waste of resources. IMHO it
would be better to change this to:
static inline int devm_mutex_init(struct device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
{
mutex_init(lock);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_mutex_release, lock);
#else
return 0;
#endif
}
To avoid the unnecessary devres allocation when
CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not set.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 18:05 [PATCH v2 00/10] devm_led_classdev_register() usage problem George Stark
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] devm-helpers: introduce devm_mutex_init George Stark
2023-12-04 18:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-06 7:56 ` George Stark
2023-12-06 14:58 ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-04 23:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-05 6:20 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-12-06 15:01 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2023-12-06 18:58 ` George Stark
2023-12-06 19:55 ` Hans de Goede
2023-12-06 21:02 ` Waiman Long
2023-12-07 0:37 ` George Stark
2023-12-07 2:16 ` Waiman Long
2023-12-07 21:29 ` Waiman Long
2023-12-06 22:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-06 22:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-06 23:24 ` George Stark
2023-12-07 11:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-07 12:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-07 12:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-07 12:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-07 12:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-07 12:51 ` George Stark
2023-12-07 13:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-07 13:24 ` George Stark
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] leds: aw2013: unlock mutex before destroying it George Stark
2023-12-04 18:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-04 23:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-06 8:37 ` George Stark
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] leds: aw2013: use devm API to cleanup module's resources George Stark
2023-12-04 18:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-04 23:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] leds: aw200xx: " George Stark
2023-12-04 18:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-04 23:17 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] leds: lp3952: " George Stark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81798fe5-f89e-482f-b0d0-674ccbfc3666@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=gnstark@salutedevices.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@salutedevices.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=vadimp@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox