From: Jason Tackaberry <tack@linux.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Writing forward compatible applications using /proc
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 23:57:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010811235718.A20414@linux.com> (raw)
I have some ideas for a comprehensive GUI disk administration tool, and
I am first thinking about some of the issues I'll face regarding
interfacing with controllers, disks, partitions, md, and LVM.
I am curious if it's a silly idea to write an application that relies on
the data in /proc? Do the kernel developers attempt to keep the data
and format provided in /proc as stable as possible? Or is it fair game
for trivial changes that could break applications that parse it? Should
I use ioctl instead?
I don't mind having to release a new update to be compatible with a new
format in /proc every once and a while, but if it's constantly a moving
target I may want to look at alternatives.
I also have the same question with LVM related tools. Is it sane to try
to wrap a GUI around lvm tools or is there some API approach that would
be better?
Cheers,
Jason.
next reply other threads:[~2001-08-12 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-12 3:57 Jason Tackaberry [this message]
2001-08-12 13:54 ` [linux-lvm] Writing forward compatible applications using /proc José Luis Domingo López
2001-08-12 15:38 ` Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-12 18:39 ` José Luis Domingo López
2001-08-12 16:39 ` Steven Lembark
2001-08-13 1:55 ` Paul Jakma
2001-08-12 17:10 ` Eric M. Hopper
2001-08-12 22:21 ` José Luis Domingo López
2001-08-12 20:46 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-12 22:35 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-08-12 20:21 ` toon
2001-08-12 19:07 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-12 19:13 ` Steven Lembark
2001-08-12 19:26 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-12 19:51 ` Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-12 20:16 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-13 9:08 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-13 11:27 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-08-13 12:48 ` Terje Kvernes
2001-08-13 23:49 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-14 13:36 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-14 0:31 ` Nathan Scott
2001-08-14 13:33 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-13 15:13 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2001-08-13 17:58 ` Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-13 19:44 ` Michael Tokarev
2001-08-13 19:49 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-08-13 20:18 ` Goetz Bock
2001-08-13 20:47 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-13 20:31 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-14 3:04 ` Mark van Walraven
2001-08-14 8:14 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-14 17:50 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-15 8:58 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-13 9:10 ` Terje Kvernes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010811235718.A20414@linux.com \
--to=tack@linux.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox