From: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper@omnifarious.org>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Writing forward compatible applications using /proc
Date: 12 Aug 2001 12:10:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <997636232.20870.2.camel@monster.omnifarious.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010812135402.A452@dardhal.mired.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1116 bytes --]
On 12 Aug 2001 13:54:02 +0000, José Luis Domingo López wrote:
> As far as I know, there are plans to remove much of the thingss that
> currently appear under /proc. It seems that only information about
> processes currently running will remain under /proc.
>
> Kernel parameters, system information, kernel variables and kernel
> tunables will probably disappear and will be replaced by some sort of
> user-space application that will allow query and modfication of kernel
> values and tunables. Something similar to Solaris' ndd, AFAIK.
This is sad. The whole point of the filesystem under Unix is to provide
a unified namespace for all the system objects you might want to talk
about.
I can see adding a new filesystem for kernel parameters that's
completely seperate from /proc, but getting rid of the ability to have
access to them directly through the filesystem is a bad idea IMHO.
:-(,
--
The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they
be properly armed. -- Alexander Hamilton
-- Eric Hopper (hopper@omnifarious.org
http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper) --
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-12 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-12 3:57 [linux-lvm] Writing forward compatible applications using /proc Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-12 13:54 ` José Luis Domingo López
2001-08-12 15:38 ` Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-12 18:39 ` José Luis Domingo López
2001-08-12 16:39 ` Steven Lembark
2001-08-13 1:55 ` Paul Jakma
2001-08-12 17:10 ` Eric M. Hopper [this message]
2001-08-12 22:21 ` José Luis Domingo López
2001-08-12 20:46 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-12 22:35 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-08-12 20:21 ` toon
2001-08-12 19:07 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-12 19:13 ` Steven Lembark
2001-08-12 19:26 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-12 19:51 ` Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-12 20:16 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-13 9:08 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-13 11:27 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-08-13 12:48 ` Terje Kvernes
2001-08-13 23:49 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-14 13:36 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-14 0:31 ` Nathan Scott
2001-08-14 13:33 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-13 15:13 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2001-08-13 17:58 ` Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-13 19:44 ` Michael Tokarev
2001-08-13 19:49 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-08-13 20:18 ` Goetz Bock
2001-08-13 20:47 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-13 20:31 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-14 3:04 ` Mark van Walraven
2001-08-14 8:14 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-14 17:50 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-15 8:58 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-13 9:10 ` Terje Kvernes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=997636232.20870.2.camel@monster.omnifarious.org \
--to=hopper@omnifarious.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox