Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "José Luis Domingo López" <jdomingo@internautas.org>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Writing forward compatible applications using /proc
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 13:54:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010812135402.A452@dardhal.mired.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010811235718.A20414@linux.com>

On Saturday, 11 August 2001, at 23:57:18 -0400,
Jason Tackaberry wrote:

> [...]
> I am curious if it's a silly idea to write an application that relies on
> the data in /proc?  Do the kernel developers attempt to keep the data
> and format provided in /proc as stable as possible?  Or is it fair game
> for trivial changes that could break applications that parse it?  Should
> I use ioctl instead?
> 
As far as I know, there are plans to remove much of the thingss that
currently appear under /proc. It seems that only information about
processes currently running will remain under /proc.

Kernel parameters, system information, kernel variables and kernel
tunables will probably disappear and will be replaced by some sort of
user-space application that will allow query and modfication of kernel
values and tunables. Something similar to Solaris' ndd, AFAIK.

Greetings.

-- 
Jos� Luis Domingo L�pez
Linux Registered User #189436     Debian GNU/Linux Potato (P166 64 MB RAM)
 
jdomingo EN internautas PUNTO org  => � Spam ? Atente a las consecuencias
jdomingo AT internautas DOT   org  => Spam at your own risk

  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-12 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-12  3:57 [linux-lvm] Writing forward compatible applications using /proc Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-12 13:54 ` José Luis Domingo López [this message]
2001-08-12 15:38   ` Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-12 18:39     ` José Luis Domingo López
2001-08-12 16:39   ` Steven Lembark
2001-08-13  1:55     ` Paul Jakma
2001-08-12 17:10   ` Eric M. Hopper
2001-08-12 22:21     ` José Luis Domingo López
2001-08-12 20:46       ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-12 22:35     ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-08-12 20:21   ` toon
2001-08-12 19:07 ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-12 19:13   ` Steven Lembark
2001-08-12 19:26     ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-12 19:51   ` Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-12 20:16   ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-13  9:08     ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-13 11:27       ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-08-13 12:48         ` Terje Kvernes
2001-08-13 23:49       ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-14 13:36         ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-14  0:31       ` Nathan Scott
2001-08-14 13:33         ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-13 15:13     ` Alasdair G Kergon
2001-08-13 17:58       ` Jason Tackaberry
2001-08-13 19:44       ` Michael Tokarev
2001-08-13 19:49         ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-08-13 20:18           ` Goetz Bock
2001-08-13 20:47             ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-13 20:31           ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-14  3:04   ` Mark van Walraven
2001-08-14  8:14     ` Joe Thornber
2001-08-14 17:50       ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-15  8:58         ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-13  9:10 ` Terje Kvernes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010812135402.A452@dardhal.mired.net \
    --to=jdomingo@internautas.org \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox