Re: [linux-lvm] Writing forward compatible applications using /proc

[Steven Lembark <lembark@wrkhors.com>]

> You should also be able to get all the information you need from the
> tools.

Problem with this is (a) having for fork/exec the tool at each
iteration and (b) having to capture/parse stdout/stderr and
check exit/signal status for each call.  Just the error checking
and validating stderr vs. stdout can double the code size for
getting data.

Another way out (which the /proc file system was intended to
avoid) is to put an add'l device file in the VG directory
(e.g., "./status") which delivers a struct or block text
with the same info as /proc has now.  Net result is that a
simple read or fgets will pull in the necessary info w/o
all the extra error checking.


--
Steven Lembark                                               2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing                                       Chicago, IL 60647
                                                            +1 800 762 1582