* [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
@ 2003-01-26 17:08 Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:08 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:13 ` Patrick Caulfield
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Svetoslav Slavtchev @ 2003-01-26 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 576 bytes --]
Hi just an intermidiate report,
cause it's with 2.4.20-dm-2
(i'm rebuilding now with dm-7)
when i try to mount a xfs filesystem wich is on
lv over soft raid-0, i'm getting just like in
2.5.2x - 2.5.4x (i didn't try later kernels) :
############################
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181311 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181343 4
############################
is this know problem, is it fixed ?
i thought that the problem exist only in 2.5 kernel
Regards,
svetljo
[-- Attachment #2: RAID-0-make_request_bug --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 15361 bytes --]
m driver Revision: 1.00
scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
Vendor: LG Model: CD-RW CED-8080B Rev: 1.06
Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
ohci1394_0: Received OHCI evt_* error 0x3
ohci1394_0: Received OHCI evt_* error 0x3
hub.c: new USB device 00:10.0-2, assigned address 2
hub.c: USB hub found
hub.c: 4 ports detected
ieee1394: ConfigROM quadlet transaction error for node 01:1023
8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.26
PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 00:09.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:08.2
PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:0e.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:0e.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:10.1
eth0: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at 0xf88fe000, 00:c0:df:09:01:60, IRQ 10
eth0: Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139B'
via-rhine.c:v1.10-LK1.1.14 May-3-2002 Written by Donald Becker
http://www.scyld.com/network/via-rhine.html
PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:12.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 9 with 00:08.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 9 with 00:10.0
eth1: VIA VT6102 Rhine-II at 0xe400, 00:04:61:43:6b:f3, IRQ 9.
eth1: MII PHY found at address 1, status 0x786d advertising 05e1 Link 45e1.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
device-mapper: allocating minor 0.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
device-mapper: allocating minor 1.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
device-mapper: allocating minor 2.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
device-mapper: allocating minor 3.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
device-mapper: allocating minor 4.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
device-mapper: allocating minor 5.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
device-mapper: allocating minor 6.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
device-mapper: allocating minor 7.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
device-mapper: allocating minor 8.
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 0
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 2
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 4
ide-scsi: hdk: unsupported command in request queue (0)
end_request: I/O error, dev 39:00 (hdk), sector 6
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
invalidate: busy buffer
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
/dev/ide/host4/bus0/target1/lun0: p4
XFS mounting filesystem device-mapper(254,8)
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181119 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181151 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181183 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181215 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181247 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181279 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181311 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181343 4
I/O error in filesystem ("device-mapper(254,8)") meta-data dev 0xfe08 block 0x801a37 ("xlog_bread") error 5 buf count 131072
XFS: failed to find log head
XFS: log mount/recovery failed
XFS: log mount failed
XFS mounting filesystem device-mapper(254,8)
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181119 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181151 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181183 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181215 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181247 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181279 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181311 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k 25181343 4
I/O error in filesystem ("device-mapper(254,8)") meta-data dev 0xfe08 block 0x801a37 ("xlog_bread") error 5 buf count 131072
XFS: failed to find log head
XFS: log mount/recovery failed
XFS: log mount failed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-26 17:08 [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0) Svetoslav Slavtchev
@ 2003-01-27 5:08 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:13 ` Patrick Caulfield
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Svetoslav Slavtchev @ 2003-01-27 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
> Hi just an intermidiate report,
> cause it's with 2.4.20-dm-2
> (i'm rebuilding now with dm-7)
it's just the same with dm-7 :(
####################################################
XFS mounting filesystem device-mapper(254,8)
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181119 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181151 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181183 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181215 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181247 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181279 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181311 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
25181343 4
I/O error in filesystem ("device-mapper(254,8)") meta-data dev 0xfe08 block
0x801a37 ("xlog_bread") error 5 buf count 131072
XFS: failed to find log head
XFS: log mount/recovery failed
XFS: log mount failed
#################################################################
any hints for testing, debuging?
is it the same with the ac kernels?
( or may be does smbd have a ac kernel with xfs , i want to test it
but ac doesn't have xfs support :( )
Regards,
svetljo
> when i try to mount a xfs filesystem wich is on
> lv over soft raid-0, i'm getting just like in
> 2.5.2x - 2.5.4x (i didn't try later kernels) :
>
> ############################
> raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than
> 16k
> 25181311 4
> raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than
> 16k
> 25181343 4
> ############################
>
> is this know problem, is it fixed ?
> i thought that the problem exist only in 2.5 kernel
>
> Regards,
>
> svetljo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-26 17:08 [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0) Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:08 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
@ 2003-01-27 5:13 ` Patrick Caulfield
2003-01-27 5:20 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Caulfield @ 2003-01-27 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:07:28AM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> Hi just an intermidiate report,
> cause it's with 2.4.20-dm-2
> (i'm rebuilding now with dm-7)
>
> when i try to mount a xfs filesystem wich is on
> lv over soft raid-0, i'm getting just like in
> 2.5.2x - 2.5.4x (i didn't try later kernels) :
>
> ############################
> raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
> 25181311 4
> raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
> 25181343 4
> ############################
>
> is this know problem, is it fixed ?
> i thought that the problem exist only in 2.5 kernel
I seem to remember that there's some option you have to give to XFS to tell it
to align the journal or something. you may have to search the LVM and/or XFS
archives for it.
Sorry that's a bit vague but I don't use XFS but I do remember a thread like
this some time ago.
--
patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-27 5:13 ` Patrick Caulfield
@ 2003-01-27 5:20 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:28 ` Patrick Caulfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Svetoslav Slavtchev @ 2003-01-27 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:07:28AM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > Hi just an intermidiate report,
> > cause it's with 2.4.20-dm-2
> > (i'm rebuilding now with dm-7)
> >
> > when i try to mount a xfs filesystem wich is on
> > lv over soft raid-0, i'm getting just like in
> > 2.5.2x - 2.5.4x (i didn't try later kernels) :
> >
> > ############################
> > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger
> than 16k
> > 25181311 4
> > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger
> than 16k
> > 25181343 4
> > ############################
> >
> > is this know problem, is it fixed ?
> > i thought that the problem exist only in 2.5 kernel
>
> I seem to remember that there's some option you have to give to XFS to
> tell it
> to align the journal or something. you may have to search the LVM and/or
> XFS
> archives for it.
>
> Sorry that's a bit vague but I don't use XFS but I do remember a thread
> like
> this some time ago.
a google search "raid0_make_request bug" gives a lot of results
(mainly my post on 2.5 problems)
do you mean :
http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-14/0127.html
it didn't help me a lot under 2.5
svetljo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-27 5:20 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
@ 2003-01-27 5:28 ` Patrick Caulfield
2003-01-27 5:35 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Caulfield @ 2003-01-27 5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:19:16PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:07:28AM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > > Hi just an intermidiate report,
> > > cause it's with 2.4.20-dm-2
> > > (i'm rebuilding now with dm-7)
> > >
> > > when i try to mount a xfs filesystem wich is on
> > > lv over soft raid-0, i'm getting just like in
> > > 2.5.2x - 2.5.4x (i didn't try later kernels) :
> > >
> > > ############################
> > > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger
> > than 16k
> > > 25181311 4
> > > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger
> > than 16k
> > > 25181343 4
> > > ############################
> > >
> > > is this know problem, is it fixed ?
> > > i thought that the problem exist only in 2.5 kernel
> >
> > I seem to remember that there's some option you have to give to XFS to
> > tell it
> > to align the journal or something. you may have to search the LVM and/or
> > XFS
> > archives for it.
> >
> > Sorry that's a bit vague but I don't use XFS but I do remember a thread
> > like
> > this some time ago.
> a google search "raid0_make_request bug" gives a lot of results
> (mainly my post on 2.5 problems)
>
> do you mean :
> http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-14/0127.html
>
> it didn't help me a lot under 2.5
It should help on 2.4. There's also a parameter to the mkfs.xfs (which is what I
actually meant but which is probably harder to find!) that has a similar effect
but you probably need to recreate the FS.
Whether this "fix" helps on existing FSs I don't know. You'll probably be better
asking on the XFS lists really.
--
patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-27 5:28 ` Patrick Caulfield
@ 2003-01-27 5:35 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:51 ` Patrick Caulfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Svetoslav Slavtchev @ 2003-01-27 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:19:16PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:07:28AM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev
> wrote:
> > > > Hi just an intermidiate report,
> > > > cause it's with 2.4.20-dm-2
> > > > (i'm rebuilding now with dm-7)
> > > >
> > > > when i try to mount a xfs filesystem wich is on
> > > > lv over soft raid-0, i'm getting just like in
> > > > 2.5.2x - 2.5.4x (i didn't try later kernels) :
> > > >
> > > > ############################
> > > > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or
> bigger
> > > than 16k
> > > > 25181311 4
> > > > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or
> bigger
> > > than 16k
> > > > 25181343 4
> > > > ############################
> > > >
> > > > is this know problem, is it fixed ?
> > > > i thought that the problem exist only in 2.5 kernel
> > >
> > > I seem to remember that there's some option you have to give to XFS
> to
> > > tell it
> > > to align the journal or something. you may have to search the LVM
> and/or
> > > XFS
> > > archives for it.
> > >
> > > Sorry that's a bit vague but I don't use XFS but I do remember a
> thread
> > > like
> > > this some time ago.
> > a google search "raid0_make_request bug" gives a lot of results
> > (mainly my post on 2.5 problems)
> >
> > do you mean :
> > http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-14/0127.html
> >
> > it didn't help me a lot under 2.5
>
> It should help on 2.4. There's also a parameter to the mkfs.xfs (which
> is what I
> actually meant but which is probably harder to find!) that has a similar
> effect
> but you probably need to recreate the FS.
>
> Whether this "fix" helps on existing FSs I don't know. You'll probably
> be better
> asking on the XFS lists really.
do you think it's only xfs related,
if i remmember correctly it's not only xfs problem
i'll check later with reiser and jfs
svetljo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-27 5:35 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
@ 2003-01-27 5:51 ` Patrick Caulfield
2003-01-27 6:12 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Caulfield @ 2003-01-27 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
>
> do you think it's only xfs related,
> if i remmember correctly it's not only xfs problem
I'm fairly sure it was just XFS. It makes (to us) odd assumptions about the
alignment of the journal or something.
> i'll check later with reiser and jfs
I've been running reiser over LVM2 for AGES !
--
patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-27 5:51 ` Patrick Caulfield
@ 2003-01-27 6:12 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 6:51 ` Patrick Caulfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Svetoslav Slavtchev @ 2003-01-27 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> >
> > do you think it's only xfs related,
> > if i remmember correctly it's not only xfs problem
>
> I'm fairly sure it was just XFS. It makes (to us) odd assumptions about
> the
> alignment of the journal or something.
> > i'll check later with reiser and jfs
>
may be i should try this patch:
http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux-stable/2.4.leading/2003-01-06:00/015RaidSplit
after i check reiser and jfs
> I've been running reiser over LVM2 for AGES !
over soft raid-0 ?
svetljo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-27 6:12 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
@ 2003-01-27 6:51 ` Patrick Caulfield
2003-01-27 8:12 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Caulfield @ 2003-01-27 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:11:53PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > >
> > > do you think it's only xfs related,
> > > if i remmember correctly it's not only xfs problem
> >
> > I'm fairly sure it was just XFS. It makes (to us) odd assumptions about
> > the
> > alignment of the journal or something.
> > > i'll check later with reiser and jfs
> >
>
> may be i should try this patch:
> http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux-stable/2.4.leading/2003-01-06:00/015RaidSplit
> after i check reiser and jfs
>
>
>
> > I've been running reiser over LVM2 for AGES !
> over soft raid-0 ?
No, true. I did try it once though :)
--
patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-27 6:51 ` Patrick Caulfield
@ 2003-01-27 8:12 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 9:11 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Svetoslav Slavtchev @ 2003-01-27 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:11:53PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > do you think it's only xfs related,
> > > > if i remmember correctly it's not only xfs problem
> > >
> > > I'm fairly sure it was just XFS. It makes (to us) odd assumptions
> about
> > > the
> > > alignment of the journal or something.
> > > > i'll check later with reiser and jfs
no problems at the first check,
transfered ~10Gb to and from the LV useing jfs and reiser
but with xfs got this:
mkfs.xfs --
device-mapper: unknown block ioctl 0x6424
device-mapper: unknown block ioctl 0x6424
and with mount again :
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
213164570 4
raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 16k
213164602 4
so let's try the patch :(
svetljo
> > may be i should try this patch:
> >
>
http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux-stable/2.4.leading/2003-01-06:00/015RaidSplit
> > after i check reiser and jfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0)
2003-01-27 8:12 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
@ 2003-01-27 9:11 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Svetoslav Slavtchev @ 2003-01-27 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm; +Cc: linux-xfs
Quoting Svetoslav Slavtchev <galia@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de>:
> Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:11:53PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > > Quoting Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > do you think it's only xfs related,
> > > > > if i remmember correctly it's not only xfs problem
> > > >
> > > > I'm fairly sure it was just XFS. It makes (to us) odd
> assumptions
> > about
> > > > the
> > > > alignment of the journal or something.
> > > > > i'll check later with reiser and jfs
>
>
> no problems at the first check,
> transfered ~10Gb to and from the LV useing jfs and reiser
>
> but with xfs got this:
> mkfs.xfs --
> device-mapper: unknown block ioctl 0x6424
> device-mapper: unknown block ioctl 0x6424
>
> and with mount again :
>
> raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than
> 16k
> 213164570 4
> raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than
> 16k
> 213164602 4
>
> so let's try the patch :(
>
> svetljo
>
> > > may be i should try this patch:
> > >
> >
>
http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux-stable/2.4.leading/2003-01-06:00/015RaidSplit
> > > after i check reiser and jfs
hm the patch doesn't apply clean, no go
what now ?
svetljo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-27 9:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-26 17:08 [linux-lvm] LVM2 for kernels 2.4.20(another problem raid-0) Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:08 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:13 ` Patrick Caulfield
2003-01-27 5:20 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:28 ` Patrick Caulfield
2003-01-27 5:35 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 5:51 ` Patrick Caulfield
2003-01-27 6:12 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 6:51 ` Patrick Caulfield
2003-01-27 8:12 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-01-27 9:11 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox