From: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:35:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041028063530.GA13279@percy.comedia.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41808B37.40406@monjoin.net>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:01:27AM +0200, Eric Monjoin wrote:
>Theo Van Dinter a �crit :
>
>Well it's because we have problems in this way. We have a server
>connected to 2 EMC Symmetrix where we assign some 70Gb and 40Gb Luns.
>We used Powerpath to manage the dual path to the Luns and so I first
>created mirror as this :
>But after a while I obtain that :
>Personalities : [raid1]
>read_ahead 1024 sectors
>Event: 10
>md9 : active raid1 [dev e9:31][1] [dev e8:e1][0]
> 42829184 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>and if we try to rebuild the mirror after after loosing access to one of
this might be a problem with powerpath, it seems harmless tough
>the EMC, we have really bad result :
>Personalities : [raid1]
>read_ahead 1024 sectors
>Event: 26
>md9 : active raid1 emcpowerd1[2] [dev e8:e1][0]
> 42829184 blocks [2/1] [U_]
> [>....................] recovery = 1.4% (630168/42829184)
>finish=68.1min speed=10315K/sec
this is a problem with linux md raid. it does not support fast resync
with a bitmap of changed sectors, there is a project to implement it,
but it is not yet in the standard kernel.
look on the linux-raid mailing list archives for something called 'fast
raid 1'.
i do not believe you would have any advantage in stacking md above lvm
anyway.
Regards,
Luca
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-28 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-27 22:02 [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 1:17 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-28 6:01 ` Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 6:35 ` Luca Berra [this message]
2004-10-28 19:17 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-11-01 16:01 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 16:51 ` Erik Ohrnberger
2004-11-01 22:03 ` Clint Byrum
2004-11-01 22:07 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-11-02 15:46 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-28 18:54 ` [linux-lvm] " Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-30 16:55 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:10 ` [linux-lvm] What is the best way to configure LVM + RAID? Erik Ohrnberger
2004-10-31 17:34 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:27 ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-30 19:22 ` [linux-lvm] LVM DISK DIE "KieZz"
2004-10-31 16:48 ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Markus Baertschi
2004-11-01 6:46 ` Scott Serr
2004-11-01 15:38 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 17:02 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041028063530.GA13279@percy.comedia.it \
--to=bluca@comedia.it \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox