From: Peter T. Breuer <ptb@lab.it.uc3m.es>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: Software raid on top of lvm logical volume
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:17:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <n6t752-uf2.ln1@triangulo.it.uc3m.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20041028063530.GA13279@percy.comedia.it
Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:01:27AM +0200, Eric Monjoin wrote:
> >md9 : active raid1 emcpowerd1[2] [dev e8:e1][0]
> > 42829184 blocks [2/1] [U_]
> > [>....................] recovery = 1.4% (630168/42829184)
> >finish=68.1min speed=10315K/sec
> this is a problem with linux md raid. it does not support fast resync
> with a bitmap of changed sectors, there is a project to implement it,
> but it is not yet in the standard kernel.
> look on the linux-raid mailing list archives for something called 'fast
> raid 1'.
fr1.sf.net (also fr5.sf.net may be of interest).
and http://www.it.uc3m.es/ptb/fr1
(yes, I am the author). Those are for 2.4 kernels. A version fo fr1
for 2.6 kernels with additional ondisk bitmaps has been done by Paul
Clements, the linux nbd maintainer, and patches by him are around.
I should look them up and merge the two .. bids accepted!
> i do not believe you would have any advantage in stacking md above lvm
> anyway.
That is right. In fact it sounds downright risky to me.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-28 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-27 22:02 [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 1:17 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-28 6:01 ` Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 6:35 ` Luca Berra
2004-10-28 19:17 ` Peter T. Breuer [this message]
2004-11-01 16:01 ` [linux-lvm] " Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 16:51 ` Erik Ohrnberger
2004-11-01 22:03 ` Clint Byrum
2004-11-01 22:07 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-11-02 15:46 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-28 18:54 ` [linux-lvm] " Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-30 16:55 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:10 ` [linux-lvm] What is the best way to configure LVM + RAID? Erik Ohrnberger
2004-10-31 17:34 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:27 ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-30 19:22 ` [linux-lvm] LVM DISK DIE "KieZz"
2004-10-31 16:48 ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Markus Baertschi
2004-11-01 6:46 ` Scott Serr
2004-11-01 15:38 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 17:02 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-02 0:33 Kai Leibrandt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=n6t752-uf2.ln1@triangulo.it.uc3m.es \
--to=ptb@lab.it.uc3m.es \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox