From: "Michael T. Babcock" <mike@mikebabcock.ca>
To: Erik@echohome.org,
LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: Software raid on top of lvm logical volume
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:46:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4187ABF1.1070004@mikebabcock.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44376.64.233.217.29.1099327893.squirrel@64.233.217.29>
Erik Ohrnberger wrote:
>This solution would seem to be as the holy grail in that it would give you
>the best of all worlds: resizable RAID storage. Or am I wrong about this
>assumption?
>
>
I've been trying to figure out a reason why it wouldn't be doable for a
few weeks now.
Currently, one can create RAID-0 like performance with LVM2 by
specifying stripes for one's LVs. Why not:
lvcreate -L 3GB --raid-level 5 --stripes 3 -n SafeData VG001 /dev/sda
/dev/sdb /dev/sdc
PV section 1 on sda and sdb are data, section 1 on sdc is XOR data. PV
section 2 on sda and sdc are data, and XOR data on section 2 of sdb, and
so on.
One of the major performance implications would be the larger block
sizes being dealt with; many people seem to find smaller stripes better
for performance in RAID-0/5 situations, and by default one would have
4MB stripes. With some effort, I'm sure this could be rectified as well.
Thoughts? Or should I blog about it instead? ;-)
If I didn't have multiple out-of-town server and firewall installations
this week, I'd code instead :-)
--
Michael T. Babcock
http://mikebabcock.ca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-02 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-27 22:02 [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 1:17 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-28 6:01 ` Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 6:35 ` Luca Berra
2004-10-28 19:17 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-11-01 16:01 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 16:51 ` Erik Ohrnberger
2004-11-01 22:03 ` Clint Byrum
2004-11-01 22:07 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-11-02 15:46 ` Michael T. Babcock [this message]
2004-10-28 18:54 ` [linux-lvm] " Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-30 16:55 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:10 ` [linux-lvm] What is the best way to configure LVM + RAID? Erik Ohrnberger
2004-10-31 17:34 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:27 ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-30 19:22 ` [linux-lvm] LVM DISK DIE "KieZz"
2004-10-31 16:48 ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Markus Baertschi
2004-11-01 6:46 ` Scott Serr
2004-11-01 15:38 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 17:02 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-02 0:33 Kai Leibrandt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4187ABF1.1070004@mikebabcock.ca \
--to=mike@mikebabcock.ca \
--cc=Erik@echohome.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox