Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael T. Babcock" <mike@mikebabcock.ca>
To: Erik@echohome.org,
	LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: Software raid on top of lvm logical volume
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:46:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4187ABF1.1070004@mikebabcock.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44376.64.233.217.29.1099327893.squirrel@64.233.217.29>

Erik Ohrnberger wrote:

>This solution would seem to be as the holy grail in that it would give you
>the best of all worlds: resizable RAID storage.  Or am I wrong about this
>assumption?
>  
>

I've been trying to figure out a reason why it wouldn't be doable for a 
few weeks now.

Currently, one can create RAID-0 like performance with LVM2 by 
specifying stripes for one's LVs.  Why not:

lvcreate -L 3GB --raid-level 5 --stripes 3 -n SafeData VG001 /dev/sda 
/dev/sdb /dev/sdc

PV section 1 on sda and sdb are data, section 1 on sdc is XOR data.  PV 
section 2 on sda and sdc are data, and XOR data on section 2 of sdb, and 
so on.

One of the major performance implications would be the larger block 
sizes being dealt with; many people seem to find smaller stripes better 
for performance in RAID-0/5 situations, and by default one would have 
4MB stripes.  With some effort, I'm sure this could be rectified as well.

Thoughts?  Or should I blog about it instead? ;-)

If I didn't have multiple out-of-town server and firewall installations 
this week, I'd code instead :-)
-- 
Michael T. Babcock
http://mikebabcock.ca

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-11-02 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-27 22:02 [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28  1:17 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-28  6:01   ` Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28  6:35     ` Luca Berra
2004-10-28 19:17       ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-11-01 16:01         ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 16:51           ` Erik Ohrnberger
2004-11-01 22:03             ` Clint Byrum
2004-11-01 22:07               ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-11-02 15:46             ` Michael T. Babcock [this message]
2004-10-28 18:54   ` [linux-lvm] " Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-30 16:55     ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:10     ` [linux-lvm] What is the best way to configure LVM + RAID? Erik Ohrnberger
2004-10-31 17:34       ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:27     ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-30 19:22       ` [linux-lvm] LVM DISK DIE "KieZz"
2004-10-31 16:48     ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Markus Baertschi
2004-11-01  6:46       ` Scott Serr
2004-11-01 15:38       ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 17:02         ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-02  0:33 Kai Leibrandt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4187ABF1.1070004@mikebabcock.ca \
    --to=mike@mikebabcock.ca \
    --cc=Erik@echohome.org \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox