From: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@kluge.net>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 13:27:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041030172738.GF13737@kluge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41814060.4040400@mikebabcock.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1370 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 02:54:24PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> >You'd usually want to make your raid devices first, then put LVM on
> >top of it. I can't really think of any benefits of doing it the other
> >way around.
>
> I've thought about this numerous times -- there is the distinct resizing
> advantage. Namely, if I create a software RAID partition, I can't
> resize it afterward without destroying it. I have for example, on
There's no resizing advantage at all -- if you add another disk to the LVM,
you can just as easily add it to a RAID array instead.
Never mind the fact that if you lose any disk in the LVM, your RAID groups are
dead (unless you split up your LVM disk, but that's what RAID does ...)
LVM gives you flexibility in your disk layout, RAID gives you performance
+ reliability. LVM builds on RAID's features, but the other way around,
RAID is undercut by LVM.
> I understand this may not be optimal in some situations, but some of us
> don't have thousands of dollars for SCSI HW RAID controllers.
Neither do I, but this is irrelevent to the conversation.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"A bride must be carried over this, but a vampire must be invited into
it." - Jeopardy Answer
"What is a Supermarket Spacer, Alex?" - Theo's Response
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-30 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-27 22:02 [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 1:17 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-28 6:01 ` Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 6:35 ` Luca Berra
2004-10-28 19:17 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-11-01 16:01 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 16:51 ` Erik Ohrnberger
2004-11-01 22:03 ` Clint Byrum
2004-11-01 22:07 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-11-02 15:46 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-28 18:54 ` [linux-lvm] " Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-30 16:55 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:10 ` [linux-lvm] What is the best way to configure LVM + RAID? Erik Ohrnberger
2004-10-31 17:34 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:27 ` Theo Van Dinter [this message]
2004-10-30 19:22 ` [linux-lvm] LVM DISK DIE "KieZz"
2004-10-31 16:48 ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Markus Baertschi
2004-11-01 6:46 ` Scott Serr
2004-11-01 15:38 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 17:02 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041030172738.GF13737@kluge.net \
--to=felicity@kluge.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox