* [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait()
@ 2006-10-18 15:27 Yoichi Yuasa
2006-10-18 16:00 ` Franck Bui-Huu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yoichi Yuasa @ 2006-10-18 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: yoichi_yuasa, linux-mips
Hi Ralf,
This patch has merged a few printk in check_wait().
Yoichi
Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
diff -pruN -X mips/Documentation/dontdiff mips-orig/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c mips/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c
--- mips-orig/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c 2006-10-18 10:20:24.397574000 +0900
+++ mips/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c 2006-10-18 10:28:53.113366750 +0900
@@ -120,11 +120,9 @@ static inline void check_wait(void)
case CPU_R3081:
case CPU_R3081E:
cpu_wait = r3081_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_TX3927:
cpu_wait = r39xx_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_R4200:
/* case CPU_R4300: */
@@ -146,35 +144,30 @@ static inline void check_wait(void)
case CPU_74K:
case CPU_PR4450:
cpu_wait = r4k_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_TX49XX:
cpu_wait = r4k_wait_irqoff;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_AU1000:
case CPU_AU1100:
case CPU_AU1500:
case CPU_AU1550:
case CPU_AU1200:
- if (allow_au1k_wait) {
+ if (allow_au1k_wait)
cpu_wait = au1k_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
- } else
- printk(" unavailable.\n");
break;
case CPU_RM9000:
- if ((c->processor_id & 0x00ff) >= 0x40) {
+ if ((c->processor_id & 0x00ff) >= 0x40)
cpu_wait = r4k_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
- } else {
- printk(" unavailable.\n");
- }
break;
default:
- printk(" unavailable.\n");
break;
}
+
+ if (cpu_wait)
+ printk(" available.\n");
+ else
+ printk(" unavailable.\n");
}
void __init check_bugs32(void)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait()
2006-10-18 15:27 [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait() Yoichi Yuasa
@ 2006-10-18 16:00 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-10-18 16:15 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Franck Bui-Huu @ 2006-10-18 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yoichi Yuasa; +Cc: Ralf Baechle, linux-mips
Hi,
Yoichi Yuasa wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> This patch has merged a few printk in check_wait().
>
> Yoichi
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
>
> diff -pruN -X mips/Documentation/dontdiff mips-orig/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c mips/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c
> --- mips-orig/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c 2006-10-18 10:20:24.397574000 +0900
> +++ mips/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c 2006-10-18 10:28:53.113366750 +0900
> @@ -120,11 +120,9 @@ static inline void check_wait(void)
does it really need to be inlined ?
> case CPU_R3081:
[snip]
> +
> + if (cpu_wait)
> + printk(" available.\n");
> + else
> + printk(" unavailable.\n");
what about:
printk(" %savailable.\n", cpu_wait ? "" : "un");
Franck
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait()
2006-10-18 16:00 ` Franck Bui-Huu
@ 2006-10-18 16:15 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 8:07 ` Yoichi Yuasa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2006-10-18 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Franck Bui-Huu; +Cc: Yoichi Yuasa, linux-mips
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:00:02PM +0200, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
>
> printk(" %savailable.\n", cpu_wait ? "" : "un");
Or more radical, just getting rid of the printk entirely? It doesn't
provide very useful information.
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait()
2006-10-18 16:15 ` Ralf Baechle
@ 2006-10-19 8:07 ` Yoichi Yuasa
2006-10-19 16:54 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yoichi Yuasa @ 2006-10-19 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: yoichi_yuasa, vagabon.xyz, linux-mips
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:15:52 +0100
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:00:02PM +0200, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
>
> >
> > printk(" %savailable.\n", cpu_wait ? "" : "un");
>
> Or more radical, just getting rid of the printk entirely? It doesn't
> provide very useful information.
>
> Ralf
>
I agree with you.
I updated my patch.
Yoichi
Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
diff -pruN -X mips/Documentation/dontdiff mips-orig/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c mips/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c
--- mips-orig/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c 2006-10-19 10:27:36.246613000 +0900
+++ mips/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c 2006-10-19 10:28:08.504629000 +0900
@@ -120,11 +120,9 @@ static inline void check_wait(void)
case CPU_R3081:
case CPU_R3081E:
cpu_wait = r3081_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_TX3927:
cpu_wait = r39xx_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_R4200:
/* case CPU_R4300: */
@@ -146,33 +144,23 @@ static inline void check_wait(void)
case CPU_74K:
case CPU_PR4450:
cpu_wait = r4k_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_TX49XX:
cpu_wait = r4k_wait_irqoff;
- printk(" available.\n");
break;
case CPU_AU1000:
case CPU_AU1100:
case CPU_AU1500:
case CPU_AU1550:
case CPU_AU1200:
- if (allow_au1k_wait) {
+ if (allow_au1k_wait)
cpu_wait = au1k_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
- } else
- printk(" unavailable.\n");
break;
case CPU_RM9000:
- if ((c->processor_id & 0x00ff) >= 0x40) {
+ if ((c->processor_id & 0x00ff) >= 0x40)
cpu_wait = r4k_wait;
- printk(" available.\n");
- } else {
- printk(" unavailable.\n");
- }
break;
default:
- printk(" unavailable.\n");
break;
}
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait()
2006-10-19 8:07 ` Yoichi Yuasa
@ 2006-10-19 16:54 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-10-19 17:48 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2006-10-19 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yoichi Yuasa; +Cc: Ralf Baechle, vagabon.xyz, linux-mips
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Yoichi Yuasa wrote:
> > Or more radical, just getting rid of the printk entirely? It doesn't
> > provide very useful information.
[...]
> I agree with you.
> I updated my patch.
You might consider removing "Checking for..." in that case as well.
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait()
2006-10-19 16:54 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2006-10-19 17:48 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 22:10 ` Yoichi Yuasa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2006-10-19 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej W. Rozycki; +Cc: Yoichi Yuasa, vagabon.xyz, linux-mips
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> > > Or more radical, just getting rid of the printk entirely? It doesn't
> > > provide very useful information.
> [...]
> > I agree with you.
> > I updated my patch.
>
> You might consider removing "Checking for..." in that case as well.
I acutally already have such a patch on the queue tree.
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait()
2006-10-19 17:48 ` Ralf Baechle
@ 2006-10-19 22:10 ` Yoichi Yuasa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yoichi Yuasa @ 2006-10-19 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: yoichi_yuasa, macro, vagabon.xyz, linux-mips
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:48:41 +0100
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> >
> > > > Or more radical, just getting rid of the printk entirely? It doesn't
> > > > provide very useful information.
> > [...]
> > > I agree with you.
> > > I updated my patch.
> >
> > You might consider removing "Checking for..." in that case as well.
Oops.
> I acutally already have such a patch on the queue tree.
Thanks,
Yoichi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-19 22:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-18 15:27 [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait() Yoichi Yuasa
2006-10-18 16:00 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-10-18 16:15 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 8:07 ` Yoichi Yuasa
2006-10-19 16:54 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-10-19 17:48 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 22:10 ` Yoichi Yuasa
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox