Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix cacheinfo overflow
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:44:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170210234437.GB9246@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d63e0019-5861-ccca-7959-631916e6c882@broadcom.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]

Hi Justin,

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:10:47PM -0800, Justin Chen wrote:
> I actually submitted a v2 of the patch sometime back located here:
> https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15107/
> 
> The v2 had some code review changes from Matt Redfearn. These changes 
> indirectly got rid of the error, which was why I wasn't running into the 
> crash.

Ah yes. It looks like Ralf applied the original patch on January 3rd,
before the last 3 submissions of the patch.

Incidentally, in future I'd recommend incrementing the patch version
number each time you submit a new version, and mentioning what has
changed in a comment at the bottom of the commit message (anything after
"---" gets dropped when the patch is applied).

A random example:
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15134/

> 
> Either way, whatever makes more sense, we can drop the other v1 patch 
> and add v2 or just add this patch on top.

Since the patch has already been applied for a while and the merge
window is imminent, I think its best to make do with fixup patches on
top this time around.

Thanks
James

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix cacheinfo overflow
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:44:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170210234437.GB9246@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20170210234437.ncqE-Yd8ZAi4pu2Us2_h7StU7FBDogBu1joqBi69_lE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d63e0019-5861-ccca-7959-631916e6c882@broadcom.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]

Hi Justin,

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:10:47PM -0800, Justin Chen wrote:
> I actually submitted a v2 of the patch sometime back located here:
> https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15107/
> 
> The v2 had some code review changes from Matt Redfearn. These changes 
> indirectly got rid of the error, which was why I wasn't running into the 
> crash.

Ah yes. It looks like Ralf applied the original patch on January 3rd,
before the last 3 submissions of the patch.

Incidentally, in future I'd recommend incrementing the patch version
number each time you submit a new version, and mentioning what has
changed in a comment at the bottom of the commit message (anything after
"---" gets dropped when the patch is applied).

A random example:
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15134/

> 
> Either way, whatever makes more sense, we can drop the other v1 patch 
> and add v2 or just add this patch on top.

Since the patch has already been applied for a while and the merge
window is imminent, I think its best to make do with fixup patches on
top this time around.

Thanks
James

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-10 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-08 23:45 Crash in -next due to 'MIPS: Add cacheinfo support' Guenter Roeck
2017-02-10  0:01 ` Justin Chen
2017-02-10  4:50   ` Guenter Roeck
2017-02-10  9:40     ` James Hogan
2017-02-10  9:40       ` James Hogan
2017-02-10 10:39       ` James Hogan
2017-02-10 10:39         ` James Hogan
2017-02-10 17:46         ` Guenter Roeck
2017-02-10 19:15           ` Florian Fainelli
2017-02-10 22:11             ` Guenter Roeck
2017-02-10 22:39               ` James Hogan
2017-02-10 22:39                 ` James Hogan
2017-02-10 22:43                 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-02-10 22:48                 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-02-10 13:30       ` Guenter Roeck
2017-02-10 23:01 ` [PATCH] MIPS: Fix cacheinfo overflow James Hogan
2017-02-10 23:01   ` James Hogan
2017-02-10 23:10   ` Justin Chen
2017-02-10 23:44     ` James Hogan [this message]
2017-02-10 23:44       ` James Hogan
2017-02-10 23:48       ` Justin Chen
2017-02-11  1:25   ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170210234437.GB9246@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org \
    --to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=justin.chen@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox